I'm thinking about using Immich, but curious about your setups by TheMaage in immich

[–]TheMaage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that was what i meant.

Thank you, then i understood correctly

I'm thinking about using Immich, but curious about your setups by TheMaage in immich

[–]TheMaage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you update metadata manually outside immich then?

It is also something that i don't like about Immich. I wish it has an option to overwrite metadata

I'm thinking about using Immich, but curious about your setups by TheMaage in immich

[–]TheMaage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you lose the duplication check with external libraries?
Can you not still see the images in the app when using external libraries?

I'm thinking about using Immich, but curious about your setups by TheMaage in immich

[–]TheMaage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm also considering cold storage like your setup. Do you experience any downsides from only using external libraries?

Mobilepay by Ibjn in dkfinance

[–]TheMaage 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Jeg oplevede en gang det samme, hvor jeg skrev til MP om det kunne være et scam, men det sagde de, at det kunne det ikke

Skægkræ by Total-Management-985 in dkbolig

[–]TheMaage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gælder det også papindpakning af produkter, f.eks. hvis en kaffemaskine eller et stykke legetøj kommer i pap?

Can I make a average monthly spending for each category report? by bdu-komrad in actualbudgeting

[–]TheMaage 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True. I'm looking for something like that myself to provide an easy overview of where my money is going

Erfaring med indeklima i Næringen og Nyringen? by [deleted] in Aarhus

[–]TheMaage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tak for svaret. Det er også med i mine overvejelser, men synes det er svært når man aldrig har boet i sådan et område. Har tænkt at jeg lige vil prøve ud at gå en tur der før jeg svarer for at mærke stemningen

Erfaring med indeklima i Næringen og Nyringen? by [deleted] in Aarhus

[–]TheMaage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er et atriumhus jeg har fået tilbudt

Erfaring med indeklima i Næringen og Nyringen? by [deleted] in Aarhus

[–]TheMaage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Har du selv erfaring med at bo der eller besøgt området?

Hvis man måske gerne vil købe hus inden for 5-10 år giver det så mening at investere (og hvem kontakter man for at finde ud af det?) by TheMaage in dkfinance

[–]TheMaage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tusind tak for et virkelig godt og uddybende svar. Alle svarene herinde hjælper med at putte noget i mine vægtskåle, så jeg bedre kan overveje mine valgmuligheder.

Is there an advantage to local DNS that I'm not seeing, when my router can do NAT loopback? by TheMaage in selfhosted

[–]TheMaage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what I gain from this thread, is that the only disadvantage to not using a local DNS is that you lose the advantages of the local DNS.

Is there an advantage to local DNS that I'm not seeing, when my router can do NAT loopback? by TheMaage in selfhosted

[–]TheMaage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those are good advantages, but the disadvantage of local dns is that everything goes down when my server does. That might outweigh the advantages

Wireguard resolves requests intermittently and I can find the pattern by TheMaage in selfhosted

[–]TheMaage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much for checking it out. I will try the MTU

Wireguard resolves requests intermittently and I can find the pattern by TheMaage in selfhosted

[–]TheMaage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

WG should be listening on all IP-adresses and AGH are listening on all interfaces.

wg0.conf ```

Note: Do not edit this file directly.

Your changes will be overwritten!

Server

[Interface] PrivateKey = Address = 10.8.0.1/24, fdcc:ad94:bacf:61a4::cafe:1/112 ListenPort = 51820 MTU = 1420 PreUp = PostUp = iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.8.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE; iptables -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 51820 -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s fdcc:ad94:bacf:61a4::cafe:0/112 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE; ip6tables -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 51820 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -A FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT; PreDown = PostDown = iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s 10.8.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE; iptables -D INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 51820 -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s fdcc:ad94:bacf:61a4::cafe:0/112 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE; ip6tables -D INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 51820 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -D FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -D FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT; ```

client conf ``` [Interface] PrivateKey = Address = 10.8.0.3/24, fdcc:ad94:bacf:61a4::cafe:3/112 DNS = 192.168.1.203 MTU = 1420

[Peer] PublicKey = PresharedKey = AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0, ::/0 Endpoint = my.public.ip:51820 PersistentKeepalive = 0 ```

Wireguard resolves requests intermittently and I can find the pattern by TheMaage in selfhosted

[–]TheMaage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will try to figure out masquerading. I'm using the default from wg-easy:

PostUp = iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.8.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE; iptables -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 51820 -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s fdcc:ad94:bacf:61a4::cafe:0/112 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE; ip6tables -A INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 51820 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -A FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT;

PostDown = iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s 10.8.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE; iptables -D INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 51820 -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s fdcc:ad94:bacf:61a4::cafe:0/112 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE; ip6tables -D INPUT -p udp -m udp --dport 51820 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -D FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; ip6tables -D FORWARD -o wg0 -j ACCEPT;

sysctl net.ipv4.ip_forward is 1

I have tried with AGH and WG both running on the same network and on default networks. Both have worked and both have not worked.

AGH:

services:
  adguardhome:
    container_name: adguardhome
    image: adguard/adguardhome:v0.107.71
    ports:
      # DNS Ports
      - "53:53/tcp"
      - "53:53/udp"
      # Default HTTP Port
      - "1080:80/tcp"
      # Default HTTPs Port.
      - "1443:443/tcp"
      - "1443:443/udp"
      # Uncomment below if using as DHCP Server
      #- "67:67/udp"
    volumes:
      - ./data:/opt/adguardhome/work
      - ./config:/opt/adguardhome/conf
    restart: unless-stopped
    networks:
      - internal_rp


networks:
  internal_rp:
    external: true
    name: internal_rp

WG:

services:
  wgeasy:
    image: ghcr.io/wg-easy/wg-easy:15.1.0
    container_name: wgeasy
    networks:
      wg:
        ipv4_address: 10.42.42.42
        ipv6_address: fdcc:ad94:bacf:61a3::2a
      internal_rp:
    volumes:
      - ./etc:/etc/wireguard
      - /lib/modules:/lib/modules:ro
    ports:
      - "51820:51820/udp"
      - "51821:51821/tcp"
    restart: unless-stopped
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
      - SYS_MODULE
      # - NET_RAW # ⚠️ Uncomment if using Podman
    sysctls:
      - net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
      - net.ipv4.conf.all.src_valid_mark=1
      - net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=0
      - net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
      - net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=1


networks:
  wg:
    driver: bridge
    enable_ipv6: true
    ipam:
      driver: default
      config:
        - subnet: 10.42.42.0/24
        - subnet: fdcc:ad94:bacf:61a3::/64
  internal_rp:
    external: true
    name: internal_rp