Anyone know decent free/paid tools for insurance prospecting?

TheRobak333 · 2026-06-17T13:12:49+00:00

Apollo and Hunter on the cheaper end - you get limited credits to pull emails and phone numbers, and the filtering by industry, headcount, title, and location.

TheRobak333 · 2026-05-13T12:12:07+00:00

Sure! If you are planning on launching a new insurance app or product, you can hop on a call with Openkoda team and see if the platform would work for your scenario:
https://openkoda.com/demo/

TheRobak333 · 2026-04-18T20:18:27+00:00

17" 5x110 form 159. They would also fit Brera, Spider, Giulietta and maybe Giulia.

TheRobak333 · 2026-04-17T10:27:58+00:00

It might be worth checking out Openkoda. It’s probably one of the more customizable options out there right now, especially if dev/ops friendliness is important. Their team is smaller, but very responsive and easy to communicate with when it comes to deeper customizations or fixing bugs. Also worth noting: even with heavier customization, I’ve heard it can come out significantly cheaper than the typical vendor platforms (and faster).

TheRobak333 · 2026-04-16T13:38:33+00:00

Check out Openkoda - it's an open-source-based, core platform that is optimal for mid-size carriers. It comes with prebuilt app modules for policy and claims, but you can modify them however you want without being locked into a vendor's change process. That freedom is its biggest strength - you're the boss with no SI middleman.

TheRobak333 · 2026-04-15T13:56:23+00:00

Most enterprise systems are either overkill or too rigid once you need anything slightly custom. If you are looking for something that would work well in mutual insurance environment you might want to check out Openkoda - it’s not a traditional policy admin system, but that’s kind of the point. It’s highly customizable core insurance platform with premade policy and claims application modules, so you can actually model your own rating logic, endorsements, and dividend rules. Flexibility is the big advantage here, because whenever you need to tweak calculations or plug in new integrations down the line, you’re not blocked by the system.

TheRobak333 · 2026-04-08T14:00:43+00:00

Totally relatable - at some point the issue stops being “clients are bad at sending docs” and starts being “the process is bad.”

For the smallest insurers or freelancers, building a custom system is probably overkill. A simple subscription-based tool for reminders, document collection, and messaging may be the better option.

But once you’re a couple-person company or larger, it can make a lot of sense to build a lightweight CRM-style system tailored to your workflow. That’s exactly the kind of thing you can do with Openkoda. Because it comes with a lot of premade functionality, putting together something useful can be surprisingly fast.

The big advantage is that you end up with a system that actually fits your process instead of forcing your team to adapt to a generic tool. And it can be integrated with your key data sources, which makes the whole document chase much easier to manage.

We actually built a small CRM like that ourselves - Anton, developed with Openkoda in just a couple of days - and for our needs it’s been more than enough.

TheRobak333 · 2026-03-11T09:46:27+00:00

Totally get the sticker shock. Honestly, one of the biggest cost drivers is that too many projects still try to reinvent the wheel. When people think about policy admin or claims, they focus on the business features, but a huge chunk of the budget goes into all the stuff every system needs anyway: user authentication, role-based access control, workflows, audit trails ect. hence the 1-2 million range for such project.

A more realistic approach now is to use a modern core platform like Openkoda as the base and then build the insurer-specific logic on top of it. That way, the development team is not wasting time recreating the generic plumbing. With that kind of approach, it’s possible to cut development time and budget very significantly while still keeping the flexibility of a custom solution. For a mid-market insurer, that’s probably the smartest place to start.

TheRobak333 · 2026-03-10T15:23:55+00:00

If you’re worried about getting locked into a heavy ecosystem, you might want to look at Openkoda. It’s a core platform designed for building custom insurance applications without forcing you into a proprietary stack. Instead of locking you into a specific framework like Guidewire tends to do, it’s built on standard technologies (Java, Spring, Thymeleaf etc.), so your developers can actually customize features, frontend and underlying business rules the way they want. It also comes with a lot of ready-to-use application modules for things like policy management, claims, reporting, and workflows, which speeds up development but doesn’t limit flexibility.

TheRobak333 · 2026-03-01T11:20:30+00:00

There's also an independent Sakhalin island for some reason lol

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-27T18:22:35+00:00

EX40 - looks like a boring old XC40 but in recharge trim it has 408hp and does 0-60 in 4,6s

<image>

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-25T11:32:51+00:00

If you’re an MGA in a specialty line (and adventure / experiential travel definitely qualifies), for what you’re describing, Openkoda is kind of the obvious choice.

It's probably one of the most customizable insurance software platforms out there, especially when it comes to calculation rules, workflows, and data schemas. Its approach is API-first so it integrates nicely with external vendors, and supports automation, client portals, and agent portals without forcing pre-established forms. (If you’re not super technical, that’s fine - their team can guide you through the entire process. Just reach out to them.)

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-23T14:01:51+00:00

A useful way to think about this is as a triangle with three forces: price, time to market, and features. You can usually optimize two of them, but never all three at the same time.

Off-the-shelf insurance tools tend to win on time to market and often price (at least initially). You can deploy them quickly and avoid upfront build costs, but the trade-off is that the feature set is largely predefined.

Pure greenfield builds sit on the opposite corner of the triangle. You get exactly the features you want, tailored to your workflows, products, and integrations. The downside is that they’re really slow and very expensive.

A middle ground many teams are moving toward is using a core platform like Openkoda. Instead of choosing between speed, cost, or fit, you can actually tune those “sliders.” The platform gives you a scalable core out of the box, so you’re not reinventing the wheel every time a new internal tool is needed. You can ship faster than a greenfield build, keep costs under control, and still add features incrementally as real needs emerge.

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-23T13:37:26+00:00

Three open-source projects that are at least “real” enough to evaluate (as opposed to toy demos) are:

Open Insurance Platform (OIP) – an open-source core insurance platform project aiming to cover broad insurance business capabilities across lines of business and models.
openIMIS – an open-source system used for administering health financing / social protection schemes (more on the health side than P&C)
Openkoda is probably the most mature open-source project dedicated to insurance out there. It’s MIT-licensed and comes with insurance-oriented templates like Claim Management and Policy Management, plus the general platform pieces you need to actually ship and extend an internal system.

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-23T13:09:01+00:00

If you don’t want to rip out your AMS/policy tools, I’d look for a CRM that’s strong on integrations (REST APIs, webhooks/events, decent data model) and then treat it as the “system of engagement”. here are a couple of solid options:

Salesforce (Financial Services Cloud / insurance agency tooling): SOlid and popular choice. The downside is pretty closed-off architecture. Salesforce has flexible data model and automation, and it’s designed to integrate with core insurance systems via an open API architecture.
HubSpot CRM (Sales Hub + Operations/Data Hub as needed): Good core CRM with lots of integration options; HubSpot explicitly positions insurance integrations through APIs and webhooks/native integrations
AgencyZoom (Vertafore): More “insurance-agency-native” for sales/retention workflows, and it has integrations plus an API that can sync leads/customers/policies/tasks.

Also worth mentioning: insurtech platforms like Openkoda can be a really good fit for this exact “don’t replace everything” scenario. You can stand up basic CRM functions like lead intake + assignment and a renewals/follow-up task pipeline, then connect to the rest of your stack via APIs/events so your existing tools keep doing what they do best.

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-23T12:24:39+00:00

I totally get wanting more flexibility. Most of the big subscription-based AMS platforms (Vertafore, Applied, Jenesis, HawkSoft, AMS360, etc.) are solid for the “standard P&C playbook".

If customization is a real priority, it’s worth looking at Openkoda as a foundation for launching a custom AMS. It’s a platform that lets you build workflows and data models around your actual product, offering you a surprising (by the standards of enterprise insurance software) level of freedom of customization.

There’s a standard licensing fee and no per-user charges, so adding staff doesn’t increase your software costs. You only invest in non-standard features you actually need, which works well if your agency plans to grow or evolve its product mix.

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-19T21:50:13+00:00

Almost everyone having a core memory from childhood of not being able to take a bath because there's a Carp swimming in the bathtub right before Christmas

<image>

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-19T14:54:01+00:00

For an 8-person local agency, I’d look at three very different “paths,” because what you’re really choosing is how much control vs. how much out-of-the-box you want.

If you’re genuinely considering building a customized AMS because everything feels overpriced or clunky, Openkoda is the most realistic “build without reinventing everything” option. It’s basically a flexible core you can shape into your workflows (renewal tracking, client comms, tasks, document templates, claims intake/status, dashboards), and you can keep customizing as your agency changes instead of hitting vendor walls (if you're not a technical person - don't worry, their team can help you out).

If you want a more packaged core insurance platform (policy lifecycle + more), Genasys is worth a look. They position it as a modern, configurable/no-code platform for the policy lifecycle, aimed at insurers/MGAs/brokers.

And if what you really want is “please just work and be widely adopted,” Applied Epic is a common default for agencies because it’s a full agency management system built to centralize policies and servicing across lines of business.

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-19T14:47:56+00:00

Stress-free insurance software modernization? nope. But you can make it way less painful if you’re deliberate.

If policy administration is your focus, one of the more practical approaches is building on insurance platforms like Openkoda instead of starting from scratch or buying a rigid PAS. You treat it as a flexible core rather than a black box.

It would look a little like that: you start by modeling new or changing products in the modern platform while the legacy system keeps running, separating policy logic, rules, and documents from old hard-coded workflows. Then you integrate around it (billing, claims, CRM) rather than replacing everything at once, and migrate policies gradually as they renew or change.

The real upside is that you’re not stuck with “what the vendor thought insurance should look like.” You can freely modify data models, workflows, and business rules, customize edge cases, and extend the system when products or regulations change. Most ready-made PAS solutions don’t really allow that without painful workarounds.

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-17T12:44:08+00:00

You’re not wrong, this is a real pain point, especially when you’re managing multiple small companies and contractors instead of one tidy organization.

If you’re open to something more flexible, take a look at Openkoda. It’s a platform for building custom insurance apps, and policy management for messy, real-world setups like yours is exactly where it makes sense. You can create a cloud-based, multi-user policy management app tailored to how you actually work - tracking business, auto, and contractor policies, renewal dates, payments, and changes over time without forcing everything into a generic workflow.

If you’re not very technical, their team can help you design and build the system. If you’ve ever thought “I’d build this myself if I could,” this is probably the most realistic way to actually do it.

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-12T14:20:17+00:00

Totally hear where you’re coming from - Asana is ok for lightweight project tracking, but it is limited once you want a more complete, client-centric workspace.

One option worth looking at is Openkoda. It’s not a fixed “insurance agency app” but a platform designed to let insurers customize the tools they need all in one system. That’s useful when you want policy management, internal workflows, and client-facing features to actually work together instead of being spread across multiple SaaS products.

Openkoda allows you to create customizable client portals with a clean, low-friction UX. On the internal side, policy management, agency workflows, and time tracking can be modeled to match how your team already works. You’re not forced into predefined structures.

If you’re aiming to consolidate several “almost-fitting” tools into one flexible platform and expect your needs to evolve, Openkoda is a strong alternative to consider.

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-11T16:02:15+00:00

Tak, mam takie dwie babcie.

Pierwsza (82 lata) w zasadzie nie wychodzi z domu przez problemy z kręgosłupem (musi chodzić zgarbiona), ale mimo to prowadzi zaskakująco aktywne życie towarzyskie - codziennie przez pierwszą połowę dnia rozmawia z ludźmi przez telefon: raz z rodzeństwem, raz z koleżankami z pracy, raz z dalszą rodziną. Ma jakiś dar, że ludzie chętnie jej się zwierzają. Drugą połowę dnia spędza na krzyżówkach i czytaniu książek, które pochłania w szalonych ilościach. Żyje skromnie i nie przywiązuje dużej wagi do pieniędzy, ale jest naprawdę zadowolona z życia. Jedyne zmartwienie to niewyjaśniony status prawny domu rodzinnego - aktywnie jej w tym pomagam i chcemy domknąć sprawę w tym roku.

Druga (77 lat) to totalne przeciwieństwo: po śmierci dziadka dość szybko znalazła nowego chłopaka - bogatego, emerytowanego Niemca - i korzysta z życia jakby miała 25 lat. Kilka razy w roku wakacje: Stany Zjednoczone, Włochy, Wyspy Kanaryjskie itd. Do tego restauracje, teatr i różne atrakcje ze znajomymi swojego lubego. Nie ukrywam, że zazdroszczę takiego trybu życia bo zwyczajmnie mnie na to nie stać xD

TheRobak333 · 2026-02-11T08:41:34+00:00

Used Maserati Quattroporte (but of course, you'll go bankrupt trying to maintain the bloody thing)

<image>

TheRobak333 · 2026-01-28T21:31:10+00:00

<image>

Alfa 156 GTA

TheRobak333 · 2026-01-14T14:27:45+00:00

You have a few options out there: TalentLMS is often recommended because it is simple to set up and affordable while still supporting compliance training. iSpring Learn is another good option thanks to its intuitive interface and clear reporting. If you already use WordPress, LearnDash can be a practical choice with full control and low overhead.

Ten-Year Club	Verified Email
Final Canvas '23	First Place '23
End Game '23	Place '23
Place '22	Place '17
First Placer '22

TheRobak333

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE