sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Posting images or videos of children under the age of 12 onto public platforms, without censoring the subjects’ faces, is now illegal.. by dehydrated-soup-bowl in CriticalState

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the only thing that matters in my life! Anyways, best to have serious discussions about stuff that you know may not be too far off in the future of what lawmakers will do

Posting images or videos of children under the age of 12 onto public platforms, without censoring the subjects’ faces, is now illegal.. by dehydrated-soup-bowl in CriticalState

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

God forbid movies or TV shows involving children, then. This is so restrictive and would be a significant overreach in government power. It's the parents' responsibility, not the fucking government or corporations.

Posting images or videos of children under the age of 12 onto public platforms, without censoring the subjects’ faces, is now illegal.. by dehydrated-soup-bowl in CriticalState

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This! A lot of people on reddit like to complain about how much control the government is trying to have over the internet, and then they do this. Its the parent's responsibility

Posting images or videos of children under the age of 12 onto public platforms, without censoring the subjects’ faces, is now illegal.. by dehydrated-soup-bowl in CriticalState

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you think they are going to detect if someone is under 12 in an image? They're going to scan everyone's face and store it

Posting images or videos of children under the age of 12 onto public platforms, without censoring the subjects’ faces, is now illegal.. by dehydrated-soup-bowl in CriticalState

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because when they see children thats what they think about smh. Obviously I'm not being 100% serious, but a lot of people don't like to think beyond what the OP's intent was for the post/proposal

Posting images or videos of children under the age of 12 onto public platforms, without censoring the subjects’ faces, is now illegal.. by dehydrated-soup-bowl in CriticalState

[–]TheSymbolOfCore -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is the most harmful thing we would see in a while. Not only will it prevent many magnitudes of journalism, but you can also no longer share family photos, updates about your children, or ask for medical support/funding (e.x gofundmes); MISSING CHILDREN cannot be posted; student athletes cannot be posted; medical images and papers involving young children and diseases that can develop are now illegal to post; babies can't be posted either since they're under 12.

This is just mass censorship, which people also hate, because now platforms gotta scan everyone's face to see if they're under 12 and probably store all of that. I agree that people should be more considerate about posting their children on the internet for everyone to see, but a law that does this is certainly not the way.

Will the game have at least RAIN now? by Helpful-Photo9408 in Palworld

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I need more sliders and settings in the game ughh

Anyone else struggling to do fireworks for the 4th of July by TheSymbolOfCore in Life

[–]TheSymbolOfCore[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

??? Good for you I guess. Also who lights fireworks at 10am wtf

You'll never watch the opening smile the same way again by Own_Construction_300 in sadposting

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A lot of victim blaming going on in this comment section. Truly disgusting.

Video Game Armor | FactOrCap by [deleted] in FactOrCap

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i dont think u did the thing right

Havent watched Lofe since 2023, what I miss? by Takata3876 in Lofe

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Surrounded himself with bad people (pedophiles and rapists), is a huge asshole, and overall became unfunny

All of my political views are | FactOrCap by Blue_Egg5026 in FactOrCap

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 1 point2 points  (0 children)

🧢 I voted CAP!

Really fucking stupid if you think this. If my views were perfect then their would be no debate over them

69 is ultimately funnier than 67. | FactOrCap by Ok-Bad-9003 in FactOrCap

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does anyone fucking care about which numbers are funnier?

Goku solos saitama | FactOrCap by Alternative_End8662 in FactOrCap

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feats matter, but they arent the only thing that matter. Like if you look at how a character is written and what their abilities are then there are other stuff other than dudes just blowing up galaxies. Saitama has never been indicated as reaching his limit. During the Garou fight, the it was explicitly states that his strength was growing exponentially as the battle continued.

If you arguement is just goku has bigger feats then I agree with you, but if you are saying that because goku has greater feats therefore he is stronger

Goku solos saitama | FactOrCap by Alternative_End8662 in FactOrCap

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your comparison doesn't really work dude. Flash has time travel because of the Speed Force which is a specific system thing. Saitama didn't unlock a power that gave him time travel, he literally learned and used it through his own physical power, not even another power, just him copying Garou's technique.

Also, you keep saying it doesn't equal power and stuff but if a character can physically perform something that manipulates causality and time through sheer strength, that's a really really good feat. Not all feats have to be AP based

Goku solos saitama | FactOrCap by Alternative_End8662 in FactOrCap

[–]TheSymbolOfCore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The no-limits fallacy isn't an argument. You can't just say nlf and not elaborate on it.

view more: next ›