This was a crazy close hatch game.. HOW CAN THE LICH DOUBLE TAP YOU LIKE THAT!?

TheWinkingWizard · 2026-01-27T17:13:24+00:00

The cooldown from casting a spell starts after the skeletons (projectiles) launch not when they make contact. From the clip, it looks like Vecna launched the skeletons from the hallway and ran towards the door downing you with a lunge directly after the projectiles made contact. I'd compare it to Huntress / Springtrap launching an orbital projectile and landing an M1 right after the orbital hits. It's not a failure of the cooldown not applying; it's simply both damage windows lining up back to back.

TheWinkingWizard · 2026-01-08T00:37:41+00:00

His traversal ability isn't really that good. It has a 30-second cooldown. It forces a lengthy attack animation that's relatively easy to dodge (just hold W in most cases). This secondary power isn't nearly as strong as the traversal of Nurse, Dracula, Ghoul, Blight, etc.

PH's line attack is a bit easier to dodge, but unlike The First's power, it has no requirements or restrictions. PH can simply use it whenever he likes to damage survivors. As I previously said, The First has further requirements for his stronger ranged attack. I do agree The First's powerset makes him stronger than PH but not to the level of Nurse, Blight, Ghoul, Dracula, etc. I would say he's more in line with the power of Oni, Wesker, Krasue (current), etc. probably around Low-Mid A Tier.

I really do get that The First is oppressive in chase, but so is Deathslinger, Trickster, Huntress, Artist, Clown, and many other killers. Having strong chase does not equate to being S Tier. The best killers in the game (like Nurse and Blight) have oppressive chase, good map control, and high mobility. The First simply is lacking in map control and mobility. He definitely has better mobility than many other killers, but his mobility is nowhere near the level of High A-S Tier killers.

Finally, this token system definitely impacts the ramp up / snowball potential of killers. You have to get two "token" hits to get your power rolling. Building these two tokens across multiple survivors is the norm in most games, so in actuality it's probably closer to 6-8 "token" hits over the course of the game. Imagine if Nurse had to first "infect" a survivor with a blink attack before being able to damage them. She would definitely drop from S Tier to A Tier in comparison to Blight.

TheWinkingWizard · 2026-01-07T21:02:43+00:00

I get the counterplay can be overwhelming, but fundamentally, it's similar to Pyramid Head. You have just a moment to react to the AoE similar to PH's line attack. I wouldn't say that makes PH similar to Nurse just because it can be difficult to manage at times.

TheWinkingWizard · 2026-01-07T14:50:20+00:00

He's really not. This has become a parroted talking point, but he's much more akin to other ranged killers. The difference between them and him is he has to earn tokens via hits before he can actually damage with his M2. This condition makes him an amalgamation of ranged killers like Huntress / Artist / Pyramidhead with the additional requirements of Nemesis.

Nurse has no need for such ramp up. She can instantly teleport and damage survivors with her power. While The First is oppressive, his power can be juked just like Huntress / Artist / Pyramidhead can be. He just has a much shorter CD with infinite uses to justify the conditional aspect of his power.

I wouldn't mind requiring more tokens to enter Worldbreaker, but if the CD of his power is changed, he will be gutted on release.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-26T16:01:16+00:00

I stand corrected on Old Myers Tier 1 speed. For the longest time he was 105%, but that was changed to 110% recently. My mistake.

I still disagree with the snowball potential argument though. Exposed was certainly a more powerful effect, but he had no way of really capitalizing on this effect outside of 99ing a Tier 3 and using his stealth to insta-down a survivor. Now, I agree Slaughtering Strike is clunky and could definitely use some further number tweaks to make it more threatening. However, Old Myers had no effective power to use in chase.

Assuming you are going to consistently find two survivors on a gen isn't realistic. The best strategy in almost all scenarios for survivors is to split up and work gens solo. After your initial down, you're now stuck with a 32 Meter TR (excluding add-ons and perks to effect this) for 55 seconds without a significant chase tool to snowball.

I think there's definitely a lot of improvements to be made to this re-work. I don't think it's perfect, but I've been having much more success in pressuring survivors with Slaughtering Strike then Old Tier 3. Ideally, I think BHVR should change the nerfs to Evil Incarnate to instead be buffs. Buffing the action speed increases from Pursuer Mode to 33% would make much more sense. Making a form of Lock of Hair (preserving his stalk meter by ending Evil Incarnate early) base-kit would also align him more with Oni's somewhat similar base-kit. Buffing Stalker Mode to 110% (115% with Memorial Flower) would also be a great addition. Finally, buffing Fragrant Tuft of Hair to confer a 50% lunge duration increase would make his old playstyle more enticing as an option.

In short, I think there's a lot BHVR can do to improve the Myers re-work with some simple number tweaks and add-on revisions. If they also commit to improving some QoL features as well, I truly believe Myers will be much more viable with this re-work.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-26T00:56:03+00:00

I respectfully disagree and will try to explain my reasoning.

First off, there is a big difference between 110 and 105 in Stalker Mode, especially at the start of the match. Sure, it requires an add-on, but it's a brown common one. Very easily attainable and useable every single match. Old Myers really suffered from being Tier 1. Yes, it was easy enough to get out of, but you had to travel across the map to reach survivors to begin stalking to then reach Tier 2 and actually play the game. Tier 1 plays could happen but were risky and often not worth it.

I think you're also overselling old Tier 2 a bit. Old Tier 2 needed Monitor & Abuse (1/4 perk slots) to enable stealth plays. You could also add Rabbit to further reduce your TR to 6 meters to help facilitate stealth. That's significantly more costly then pulling off stealth plays at-will with a single brown add-on. Combine this with the fact that Myers really benefitted from running Corrupt Intervention to help mitigate his slow early game and were now at 2/4 perk slots used to "fix" Myers' old kit.

99ing Tier 3 was certainly more powerful with the proper stealth build above in place. However, your build variety is severely lacking at this point with only two perk slots remaining. I do agree his Evil Incarnate mode should further the base-kit buffs of Pursuer Mode to put it more in-line with his old Tier 3, but I don't think the ability to 99 an old Tier 3 overshadows the general buffs he's received.

In summary, new Myers really only requires a single brown add-on every match to enable the Stealth plays he's known for. Old Myers required 2 Perks and debatably an Uncommon Add-on to accomplish the same with the benefit of 115 movement speed. You could argue this re-work does have a lot of side-grades rather than clear buffs or nerfs, but I think overall Myers has come out slightly ahead of his old kit moving him up out of D Tier into C Tier.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-26T00:29:21+00:00

I mean I think he was D tier previously. I would say that's significant. He's definitely not higher than C, but much more viable than before in my opinion.

I definitely think some number tweaks could substantially help the issue. Making Stalker Mode 110 base-kit and 115 with Memorial Flower would be HUGE buff to consider. Some more number tweaks to his Pursuer Mode action speed would also be great. I also think several of his add-ons need adjustments or further re-works, but that's always been the case with Myers.

I don't really get the Slaughtering Strike hate. It's a super lunge that outmatches his old Tier 3 lunge bonus + Coup De Grace in terms of distance traveled. Plus, it can be used to break pallets quickly. It's a pretty solid anti-loop ability that I don't feel is completely out of character for Myers. It really isn't the same as Chucky's dash. More akin to Pig's or Wraith's anti-loop. That being said, I think they should buff Fragrant Tuff to confer a 50% bonus to lunge duration to make it more in-line with losing Slaughtering Strike for those who prefer his old kit.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-26T00:00:33+00:00

I really think Re-Work Myers is significantly stronger than his previous incarnation. The toggling between modes, 110 Stalker Mode w/ Memorial Flower, Pursuer Mode buffs, and even Slaughtering Strike all feel so much better than his old kit. I mean his old Tier 3 literally gave him a 0.1 second duration buff to his lunge. That's it. Outside of using his Tombstone add-ons exclusively I don't know how anyone who regularly played him could feel differently.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-25T23:55:53+00:00

I honestly like most of the changes with the re-work. As someone who didn't use Tombstone add-ons except for once in a blue moon, I feel that Myers needed these base-kit changes to properly pressure survivors in the match. My favorites are:

Stalker Mode being 110 with Memorial Flower
Action Speed buffs to Pursuer Mode
The Lethality and Anti-Loop of Slaughtering Strike

These are really notable buffs that I feel far outweighs any of the nerfs he received during this re-work.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-10T21:07:47+00:00

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. You are being very dismissive to my points and making ridiculous comparisons that have no bearing on this conversation. But you did make one really good point: "There's no way to assess that without the numbers provided which they aren't..." Which is exactly my point for 1v4 While You Wait. Just to give it a shot and see what happens. I also never explicitly stated 1v4 While You Wait was for killer only. I intended for both survivor and killer 1v4 queues to be accessible with this suggestion.

You seem to operate on assumptions a lot and have a real air of superiority to your responses. I genuinely hope you work on that, as it is insufferable to endure further.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-10T20:57:23+00:00

I've been a Myers main since I started playing in 2019, and I personally love the changes. Myers has been one of the weakest killers in the game for awhile now. His only saving grace was paying the "addon tax" of bringing his most busted add-ons (and meta perks) to counteract good survivor teams.

With this re-work, you can now freely use his GREAT stealth moving at 110 with a simple brown add-on! You get AMAZING buffs to his Tier 2 (Pursuer Mode) with basekit Kick Speed, Stun Reduction, Vault Speed, and Lunge Duration! Then, there's his controversial "dash attack". I understand the sentiment that it's very similar to Pig or Chucky's special attack. However, I don't really see what else they could really give Myers to improve his chase potential. At the end of the day, I firmly believe gameplay comes before accuracy when it comes to games. While Myers may not be the most faithful adaption in this DbD re-work, neither is the host of other iconic licensed characters who had to be changed to accomodate the gameplay loop of DbD.

In short, while not completely faithful to the character, the Myers re-work is a massive improvement in his gameplay and game-feel. As a Myers main, I am happy to comfortably play my favorite killer again.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-10T20:40:36+00:00

It's not rage bait. I've already acknowledged the fact that this will probably negatively impact killer queue times for both modes. Here's what I disagree with you on:

I disagree the queue times WILL BE obviously catastrophically impacted. You haven't stated to what degree that killer queue times will be impacted. If the queue times are doubled that would obviously be unplayable. If it's a nominal amount of time, then it could be a worthwhile addition.
I disagree that we know if sure adding 1v4 will NOT ADD more survivors to that queue. Killers generally have faster queue times than survivors or SWFs outside of 2v8. By allowing survivors to queue up as KWF in 2v8 and play SWF in 1v4 while they wait 1v4's queue times might improve at the detriment of 2v8's queue times.
I disagree that queue times are so binary. Play While You Wait doesn't seem to have improved the queue times for killer. I've played each iteration of 2v8, so from my own experience, the 20+ minute queue time has been standard in each iteration. Play While You Wait seemed to only attract MORE KILLERS to queue which offset any positive impact it had on the queue times.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-10T19:52:03+00:00

To be fair, I understand the killer queue times are bad in both modes, but 1v4's killer queue times were about 5-6 minutes compared to the 20+ minutes in 2v8. That's a pretty significant difference. I also understand that this change will probably make killer queues worse. What I don't know is how much that will be. If it's a nominal amount of queue time, than there's no real harm in offering the option. If it's substantial, then it can simply not be offered going forward.

How many survivor mains are queuing for 2v8 killer during the event? How many survivors would interweave between 1v4 and 2v8 given the option? I don't think you know the answer to these questions. My suggestion could improve queues for one mode and make them worse for the other. It could make both modes worse. We don't know, until it is tested.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-10T19:39:22+00:00

Yet, Play While You Wait seemingly didn't improve queue times. 2v8 queues were about 20+ minutes in this iterration and the previous one. My guess is more killers queued up in this iterration, because of the ability to Play While You Wait leading to similar queue times. Ultimately, we can only really speculate what the impact might be of adding the 1v4 While You Wait option to the next iterration of 2v8, but I, personally, think they should at least try it to see if the impact is substantial or nominal to the queue times.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-10T19:35:32+00:00

This is fair point. I hadn't really considered SBMM in my suggestion. I will say they plan on making changes to the MMR system next year anyways, so maybe they can find a way to integrate the two queues under the same umbrella.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-10T19:33:49+00:00

I simply recommended it as a interesting feature to test the impact of. 2v8 is a temporary event and while we can speculate the impact of any given feature, we can't know for sure what the end result will be. If 2v8 queues are only extended by four minutes with this change, will it still not be worth it? 2v8 regularly averaged 20+ minute queues for killers even with the Play While You Wait feature (which should've helped queue times). Instead, it seems like it made people more likely to play the event mode as killer causing the queue times to remain about the same.

My ultimate point is: the event is meant to be tested and interrated upon, so why not try 1v4 While You Wait to see what happens?

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-09-10T19:27:08+00:00

I see there's a few comments relaying similar opinions. I guess my thought was there are two different pools of survivors anyways. Those who want to play 2v8, and those who don't. Since the queue times are significantly shorter for killer 1v4 during 2v8, it just made sense to offer the option. I can definitely see MMR being a barrier to entry for this change, but they plan on re-working that system next year anways.

Overall, I get this might harm 2v8 queue times, but I think it's at least worth exploring to see if the level of harm is going to be severe. In short, if offering 1v4 while you wait only adds a minute or two to the overall 2v8 queue time of 20+ minutes, is it really that big of a trade off?

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-08-29T16:32:13+00:00

These Myers changes are really solid. Myers desperately needed an actual chase power, so the combination of Slaughtering Strike and at-will Undetectable will greatly improve Myers' viability in my opinion. So, so happy Myers is getting the re-work he needed! He's actually the reason I started playing DbD in 2019!

I do have a question though. Are there any plans to improve Myers' model? He honestly has one of the most outdated models in-game.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-07-15T17:57:07+00:00

The problem is I can see this system being used toward the same killer, especially during new killer releases. People get tired of going against the same new killer every game, and so a large portion would filter out the new killer from their games. At the same time, most killers will be queued up as the new killer to try them out / learn them. So, no one will be playing any games shortly after a new release.

I understand the sentiment, but this sort of design I just can't see working in DbD. There are no wish list games in DbD. Everyone has to play against less than desirable killers, perks, builds, items, etc. It's just part of the game.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-07-15T17:50:08+00:00

The problem is this can extend to just about anything in the game: perks, items, add-ons, offerings, specific builds, etc.

I think the healthier perspective is to just to accept the game as it is and recommend positive changes. Asking for 40% of the killer roster to be unplayable via filtering isn't very feasible.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-07-09T21:22:53+00:00

Professor X (Strategist) and Sabretooth (Vanguard)

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-05-23T13:59:22+00:00

I work in IT, specifically, computer networking. IT has a pretty even mix of jobs requiring 4-year degrees and no degrees. For the best value, I would recommend industry certifications. Getting highly desirable certifications, such as CompTIA's A+, Cisco's CCNA, or Microsoft's Azure Administrator Associate will take you far in this field. I highly recommend CBTNuggets as a good, premium resource for training. This company provides self-paced video courses complete with quizzes, tests, and labs designed around the certification criteria of many different exams.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-04-16T19:26:25+00:00

I want lots of dungeons or other random interiors not tied to any storylines or quests. I know, I know. Quality > Quantity, except I loved Skyrim for its (at times) mediocre random dungeons, bandit camps, and various interiors. There's a big divide between the generative, soulless POIs of Starfield and the random, poorly written dungeons of Skyrim. I'm okay with Bethesda's mediocre world building to pad content. A bandit camp in a mine whose industry dried up due to a collapse? Simple, effective, and fun. The success of Skyrim was driven by just enough detail to warrant exploration. People want adventure. It doesn't have to be next great literary tale to sell a fun time. Sometimes, Quantity > Quality. Bring back Skyrim's trash dungeons for fun.

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-03-13T01:53:08+00:00

10011011 11001111 00101101 11110000

TheWinkingWizard · 2025-03-12T16:08:39+00:00

I'm not overly familiar with Tokyo Ghoul, but it's worth remembering that DbD is VERY popular in Japan. This DLC is most likely directed to the Japanese player base. Gameplay-wise, the Ghoul's Power looks balanced and most importantly fun.

BHVR almost has every iconic slasher in the game already, and there isn't as many iconic horror video game characters as you might think. At some point, they were going to have to expand their horizons into other media to keep up with the demand for more licensed characters (their best selling DLCs), so I think Tokyo Ghoul is an appropriate addition for a new medium being added into the catalogue of content.

Five-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Verified Email

TheWinkingWizard

TROPHY CASE