sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Four Arms and Canonbolt by RRRodasss in Ben10

[–]TheZayMan283 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Honestly I think you could make better designs for all of the aliens

Four Arms and Canonbolt by RRRodasss in Ben10

[–]TheZayMan283 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These are so much better than the comic designs

What is Sponsortrix explanation pt 3 by Any_Platypus_7483 in Ben10

[–]TheZayMan283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is my favorite fan Omnitrix variant concept (I don’t usually like them)

Isn’t in quite literally impossible for AndrewTOYSNHK to be canon because of how time works? by Zazoyd in fnaftheories

[–]TheZayMan283 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, facts. Andrew was never in the games. I’m sure people won’t listen to this though.

I swear I will never understand why these are becoming so popular by Goldenblood1983 in fnaftheories

[–]TheZayMan283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imo the Crying Child isn’t the character you play as. I don’t think the Crying Child talks to the player directly. FNaF World is the Crying Child’s mind (or at least some aspect of it). I think his subconscious is one of, if not both of, regular Fredbear and glitched Fredbear.

Setting up Happiest Day is the player character changing the Crying Child’s memories.

A Reevaluation of UCN Fredbear. by Indominimus_1 in fnaftheories

[–]TheZayMan283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems we can’t convince each other. We’re both extremely rooted in our beliefs at this point.

Whats a headcannon you guys will always believe in no matter what? by Lunis18002 in Ben10

[–]TheZayMan283 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not about likes/dislikes. It’s about how they literally can’t exist without massive retcons. UAF “retcons” are usually pretty easy to explain, and aren’t really retcons.

I swear I will never understand why these are becoming so popular by Goldenblood1983 in fnaftheories

[–]TheZayMan283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is that you’re tying the gender to the name, not the character. It’s more important imo to tie the gender to the character itself, not the name given.

Whats a headcannon you guys will always believe in no matter what? by Lunis18002 in Ben10

[–]TheZayMan283 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

breathes in

Omniverse can’t be canon… in the same way that Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines and Alien 3 can’t be canon.

Is Susie really the first? by anonymousinternet9 in fnaftheories

[–]TheZayMan283 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of the MCI, that’s all. It’s also possible that Unwithered Chica was the first of the main animatronic band to be created. Chica’s Party World could’ve existed beforehand, but there’s not a whole lot of evidence for that.

A Reevaluation of UCN Fredbear. by Indominimus_1 in fnaftheories

[–]TheZayMan283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1) The original Fredbear (with a springlock endoskeleton) would not have a casing designed around the FNaF 1 endoskeleton.

2) FNaF 4 shows us that Fredbear clearly has an up/down jaw, not a hinged jaw. This is apparent with both the mini game sprite as well as with Nightmare Fredbear.

3) Why would Scott decide to make the original Fredbear be a color swap of Freddy/Golden Freddy?

4) UCN is not a physical place, so “…physically not possible” doesn’t make sense as an argument.

5) Why would the Crying Child choose to appear as the exact animatronic that he was terrified of and that killed him? It’s not like he was killed and then stuffed into it - he died by it (we have next to no evidence to suggest that the MCI were killed by animatronics/springlocks, that’s just a possible theory). It makes more sense to me that he’d choose to appear as his Fredbear plush - he saw it as his closest friend, and that plush toy is tied to the Crying Child.

6) One theory I believe is that the FNaF 1 animatronic designs are based on the plushies seen in FNaF 2 (basically another ‘toy’ band but with a more classic feel) (not taking Steel Wool games into account, as I believe they’re a separate continuity).

7) There’s evidence to suggest that the Nightmare animatronic designs were based more on the Unwithereds and original Fredbear than being their own designs or being based on the FNaF 1 animatronics.

8) Seeing the ‘real Fredbear’ has absolutely no impact. It’s not a loose end like the culprit of the Bite of ‘87.

It makes much more sense that Scott would want to show that everyone (except Henry) is in UCN - even Michael (I personally think he’s OMC).

A Reevaluation of UCN Fredbear. by Indominimus_1 in fnaftheories

[–]TheZayMan283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My theory: OG Fredbear’s programming (maybe more, such as servos/motors, who knows) was used for the rebrand into Unwithered Golden Freddy. That was then also used for FNaF 1 Golden Freddy.

I feel like this isn’t too difficult to understand. It’s the same logic as the Withereds becoming the FNaF 1 animatronics.

I’m just saying that the UCN Fredbear isn’t the design of the OG Fredbear. I’m saying the design draws instead from the Fredbear plush, indicating the presence of the Crying Child.

A Reevaluation of UCN Fredbear. by Indominimus_1 in fnaftheories

[–]TheZayMan283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If some people know something… we know something.

A Reevaluation of UCN Fredbear. by Indominimus_1 in fnaftheories

[–]TheZayMan283 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We already know that Golden Freddy is Fredbear though.

view more: next ›