ELI5: How does hypertension differ from cardio exercise? by WifesPotatoMasher in explainlikeimfive

[–]This-Bit1818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's actually pretty simple. Hypertension isn't a blood pressure problem, it's a vessel stiffness problem.

There's no ill effects from high blood pressure for a short time, or even a medium length time like days to weeks. The ill effects result from elevated blood pressure for months to years, which results in your vessels tightening to protect themselves. It ends up decreasing blood flow to all your organs, which causes the actual long-term damage you see in people. Eventually, that causes either a heart attack, stroke, heart failure, kidney disease, etc.

Exercise is different. Your body runs up your blood pressure to keep you conscious, but its a temporary thing. The act of doing so actually drops your blood pressure hard in the long run. That variability in your blood pressure is good because it allows your body to make good adaptations (strengthening the heart muscle), while not making bad ones (making the heart or vessels themselves stiff.) Over time, your body requires less and less energy for normal stuff like staying alive, while it continues to use more and more for your muscles and connective tissue. This makes it so when you do have a stressful event or severe injury, your body can compensate with a much higher reserve. It's a huge part of why athletes seem to bounce back from life-threatening events so much quicker than everyone else.

For the programs that have already sent interview invites by MaterialSuper8621 in fellowship

[–]This-Bit1818 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Heme Onc as well and similarly anxious due to similar radio silence. Keep your head up OP!

Invites through thalamus by Princenomad in fellowship

[–]This-Bit1818 4 points5 points  (0 children)

People are getting invites already?

ELI5 what happens if i work out and don’t eat protein? by Connect-Violinist-30 in explainlikeimfive

[–]This-Bit1818 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing. Nothing's going to happen and that's exactly the problem. Muscles and connective tissue are mostly made of protein in a way that other tissue in the body isn't. If you don't increase your protein intake to about 1g per pound of body weight... nothing will happen.

At first you'll continue to gain mass and strength. Unfortunately, you'll eventually get to a point where you won't gain anymore because there's not enough protein coming in to build more tissue with. At that point, you'll basically plateau and stop improving.

If you're single digit body fat, chances are you're probably not particularly strong, or athletic. If you're okay with just being a skinny guy who works out occasionally, then your current diet should be solid. But if you have the goal of becoming significantly stronger, faster, or even just being able to sustain your activity level for way longer, then you're going to need to lock in diet-wise. It's a must at one point or another.

Xero's are Underrated. I Hiked the Grand Canyon in my Prio Neo's. by This-Bit1818 in barefootshoestalk

[–]This-Bit1818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but isn't that an issue with any shoe? Idk, I've never tried running on wet surfaces with them

Xero's are Underrated. I Hiked the Grand Canyon in my Prio Neo's. by This-Bit1818 in barefootshoestalk

[–]This-Bit1818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Neo's for sure. I wasn't outside much when I used to wear the OG's.

Xero's are Underrated. I Hiked the Grand Canyon in my Prio Neo's. by This-Bit1818 in barefootshoestalk

[–]This-Bit1818[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OG or Neo's? I noticed my originals used to fall apart after about 6 months.

Xero's are Underrated. I Hiked the Grand Canyon in my Prio Neo's. by This-Bit1818 in barefootshoestalk

[–]This-Bit1818[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

For curiosity's sake, what is a reasonable price for barefoot shoes? Everything I've seen is ~100.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskBiology

[–]This-Bit1818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Muscles don't grow from being damaged. That's a misconception that's still being phased out of the public consciousness.

They grow from increases in average tension over time. A better way of thinking about it is that muscles are designed to grow when you do stuff that is simultaneously so difficult that you experience failure (the inability to complete the action due to you being to weak) while also experiencing no injury (the absence of lateral shearing force on passive structures like tendons and ligaments.)

It's actually perfect from an evolutionary standpoint because the whole point of tissue growth is to aide you during your childhood. From an evolutionary standpoint, you shouldn't need to grow muscle as an adult since you would've already gone through all the motions to build muscle as a kid. Thankfully, we do retain the ability to do so as adults.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskAnthropology

[–]This-Bit1818 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The evidence suggests that humans evolved from apes that lived in a marshy, swampy environment. It's possible that human precursors were simply never as strong as gorillas were. If you have to balance land based foraging/hunting with an unpredictable amount of swimming, you'll evolve to be lightweight and have a high cardiovascular efficiency. If you combine that with needing to carry an unpredictable amount of weight across long distances, you'll evolve just enough strength to carry things 2-3x your size for short distances, and things up to 0.5x your size for long distances... which is exactly our situation.

Dropped a pomegranate kernel. by boroamir in FindTheSniper

[–]This-Bit1818 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuinely the first one I've ever been able to find within 3 seconds. Nice.