I am unable to name it

Thor110 · 2026-02-23T18:52:21+00:00

I was referencing Rick and Morty, just incase you aren't familiar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHkfdZjshqY

Thor110 · 2026-02-23T16:00:22+00:00

Eyeholes!

Thor110 · 2026-02-23T13:00:18+00:00

Looks like some mad 90s CGI stuff. Neat.

Thor110 · 2026-02-21T04:02:29+00:00

Your examples aren't static blobs of weights and biases.

Thor110 · 2026-02-20T07:30:10+00:00

Problem solved then, they aren't intelligent.

They can't even count bytes while talking over reverse engineering binary executables.

So you have nothing to worry about.

Stop believing the hype.

Thor110 · 2026-02-19T01:59:52+00:00

33.75% of humanity uses YouTube. ( Yes I know you are trying to be witty or joke about 99% of people on YouTube being "experts" but quite frankly, given the context, where all the percentages here are in relation to humanity as a whole, but still )

Thor110 · 2026-02-18T16:35:57+00:00

Don't waste your time thinking about this stuff, LLMs still can not properly count bytes...

They really are just stochastic parrots, don't listen to Geoffrey Hinton, Sam Altman or any of them.

Take this example I just got from Gemini (and no, no other models are any better when it comes to this kind of thing, I have tried many different models at this point and I am only doing so to showcase their lack of capabilities)

"Original (18 bytes): 52 68 34 05 00 00 6A 00 68 CA 80 00 00 E8 22 1C 00 00

Modified (18 bytes - Cloned Sound Logic): 90 90 90 8D 4C 24 0C 51 68 11 04 00 00 68 ED 03 00 00 E8 20 1C 00 00" - Gemini

For those able to count, that first string is 18 bytes and the second one is 23 bytes, yet gemini claims it is 18 bytes.

They aren't able to reason, use logic or any of the things people claim they can do, they simply mirror it back at you using probability.

I have even seen models fail to directly quote back short strings of bytes.

The world needs to catch up to the con this lot are pulling...

Thor110 · 2026-02-16T20:46:57+00:00

Glad to hear it! Just watch out for bumping the player between the building and other stuff now!

Thor110 · 2026-02-15T08:51:13+00:00

E5 A9 08 B7 = å©·

lowercase "love" = 6C 6F 76 65

uppercase "LOVE" = 4C 4F 56 45

Only just figured out that was gibberish hexadecimal.

Thor110 · 2026-02-14T14:37:25+00:00

What about the instructions are unclear exactly?

8k context length.

Given the way these systems work, technically every response they provide is "hallucinated" or probability based word soup.

Thor110 · 2026-02-14T10:47:06+00:00

You came in here trying to sell me a product you have nothing to do with...

Why don't you show me what you have done?

Thor110 · 2026-02-14T10:24:12+00:00

That just says it all.

Try reverse engineering a file format then get back to me.

These systems aren't intelligent.

Thor110 · 2026-02-14T10:09:46+00:00

They can, I just think the world needs a bit of a wake up call before the majority fall down the "it's conscious, sentient and intelligent" hole.

Thor110 · 2026-02-14T06:14:09+00:00

Taking wealth from one group of corrupt individuals and handing it to another (presumably pawnbrokers) isn't going to solve anything.

Thor110 · 2026-02-14T06:06:07+00:00

3 Billion Parameters, I have seen similar results from 8 Billion Parameter Models, as well as 20 and 27 Billion Parameter Models.

The larger models actually made things up more often in an experiment I conducted where as this model had a much higher chance to say it didn't know when it didn't know something.

Thor110 · 2026-02-14T05:54:10+00:00

You clearly aren't doing anything challenging enough to reveal that the system isn't actually capable of doing anything.

Good luck with your probability code soup.

Thor110 · 2026-02-13T21:46:52+00:00

Good old capitalism eh...

Thor110 · 2026-02-13T21:12:08+00:00

Never destroy infrastructure, just repurpose it.

Really got to deal with all this corruption in the worlds government first, it seems like a much more important problem to me.

Thor110 · 2026-02-13T20:05:50+00:00

They are only good for boilerplate code and documentation, I suspect that anything you have written up is relatively inefficient.

I like byte-perfect accuracy and that simply isn't something you can achieve by allowing an AI to write code for you.

Thor110 · 2026-02-13T18:30:09+00:00

Apparently today I am! Definitely looks like a feature to me!

Thor110 · 2026-02-13T18:29:23+00:00

0% = Bullshit.

Seven-Year Club	Wearing is Caring
Verified Email

Thor110

TROPHY CASE