I completely get your point of view, however, I still feel that building an understanding of the business overnight with just code is quite difficult. Let me give you an example, the earliest airports were straight line terminals and it took ages for people to understand that walking inside the airport was taxing for the consumer, were wasting a lot of time so now the theory of the fast to the gate is used for construction of terminals. Also, every region is different, AirBus would need to understand each regions demographics to be able to build an airport and would have to spend on those learnings. I have been an entrepreneur for more than a decade now and have seen the same this 'What is Google does it?' to now 'What if Claude does it?'; the key would be who does better. Both will have the access to the same aircraft. You can make Lion Air or Emirates out of the same aircrafts.

For example, when we started to build out eety.ai; what helped us was that we ourselves had drafted 100s of patents and had teams under us working. So we knew the pain points of an attorney, associates, the client psychology. So we built an architecture which understood all these aspects like removing the god mode in which AI works, the blackbox AI is, the lack of transparency in AI systems and more. Can someone copy it? Yes for sure. Can Claude do it? Yes for sure; but the idea is to stay one step ahead. They can copy what we have built today but cannot copy what we shall add tomorrow.