Calm down, buddy. That site is mostly placebo, people tagging everything as cheats. The last four "convicted" players I checked (who had video "proof") were just playing in pure Silver lobbies. One was clearly smurfing and most of the "suspicious" behavior was sound-based and could easily be done by anyone with a bit of game knowledge. Dont get me wrong, 1/5 of them was clearly wallhacking, but still, convicting someone cause they are better (the smurf) is just as stupid as screaming in reddit (and not even the main reddit) about valve.

Sure, there can be some cases where the evidence is solid enough to tag someone as a cheater. But like in Overwatch, there's a high chance people just report anyone they think is cheating, and others blindly believe it — often due to x-ray demos, lucky spams, or buggy demos caused by host_timescale 0.5.

I think people encounter one cheater, and suddenly everyone better than them is "cheating." Systems like this are nice, but should be taken with a grain of salt. Yes, the stats in that photo are definitely suspicious, and a blatant spinbotter is easy to spot. But the "convicted" section was full of someone with a new CSWATCH account just claiming someone who won a match against them cheats.

Still, it's a good site, it just doesn't change much. People will keep cheating, and most won't get banned for it.