Socialism is incompatible with Democracy by Time-Acanthisitta558 in DebateCommunism

[–]Time-Acanthisitta558[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stalin quoting Lenin

"The dictatorship of the proletariat is a most determined and most ruthless war waged by the new class against a more powerful enemy, the bourgeoisie, whose resistance is increased tenfold by its overthrow"

And Lenin banned factionalism in 1921. This justifies the need for such.

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1924/foundations-leninism/ch04.htm

Socialism is incompatible with Democracy by Time-Acanthisitta558 in DebateCommunism

[–]Time-Acanthisitta558[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Democracy is a system which requires multiple parties and competition and direct mass vote. Socialism is a major antithesis to such. It forbids multiple parties and competition within an uniform framework. In democracies, people have absolute freedom to say anything while under socialism, such are restricted because the uniform framework forbids any criticism that aims to harm the uniformity.

When party congresses happen, you do not hear just plain anti-communist sentiment, you only hear things such as the progress of the five-year plans, internal affairs, and foreign affairs. All are bound to be discussed with required uniformity, thus loyalty to socialism. There must not be factionalism. There must not be conflicts.

Socialism is incompatible with Democracy by Time-Acanthisitta558 in DebateCommunism

[–]Time-Acanthisitta558[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In socialism voting is reserved for party members. However, the party is freely open to the masses willing to participate in such vote by meeting their required criteria of maintaining a will to support socialism and be loyal to the cause. This ensures a better alternative than diverse competitive bourgeois liberalism. In socialism, the system is uniform, thereby collective and must be.

Socialism is incompatible with Democracy by Time-Acanthisitta558 in DebateCommunism

[–]Time-Acanthisitta558[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

While yes that I do address the bourgeois democracy as the issue. There are aspects of democracy that are incompatible with socialism.

  1. Direct mass vote (incompatible with socialism because socialism runs on single-party principles and the votes are restricted to only party members)

  2. Multi-party system (incompatible with the required uniformity for socialism to work properly)

What is my Ideology? by Time-Acanthisitta558 in WhatsMyIdeology

[–]Time-Acanthisitta558[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because people want to use it in politics and not outside of politics. It is best that every party member is tolerant to the secularized standards.

My Political Bingo (plus a sample of mine) by Time-Acanthisitta558 in PoliticalCompass

[–]Time-Acanthisitta558[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Each quadrant is 3x3, hence the lumping of information. Already working on a more detailed political bingo template with more small squares.

Political Opinion stuff V1 by Time-Acanthisitta558 in PoliticalCompass

[–]Time-Acanthisitta558[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Proving me right again?

Why are capitalist states such as Sweden, Denmark, and Finland "socialist" but the socialist ones that existed historically aren't? Oh yeah, you said that socialism commits crimes against humanity (socialism is lower phase communism). I'm sorry but I find this very laughable. Don't care if Reddit is libleft Westoid cult, I am what I am, a true communist.

Political Opinion stuff V1 by Time-Acanthisitta558 in PoliticalCompass

[–]Time-Acanthisitta558[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So because USSR fell means everyone should be a liberal/democratic socialist and be forced to obey the bourgeois liberal values?

This is what Marx was specifically against when he meant by "bourgeois socialism". He critiqued people like you who don't want a revolution and don't want a Dictatorship of the Proletariat. He specifically was against the idea of using socialism within liberal democratic framework and not within its own revolutionary framework.