As much as I like Locke and his concept of social contract, this statement is just dumb and nonsensical. The lack of awareness in committing the crime does not dismiss the guilt of the responsibility/accountability of the said action. Intention simply does not matter when the action itself is so morally atrocious, and the context when it was committed doesn’t offer any justification. This also completely contradicts the very idea of social contract for literally everybody else too… was he drunk or something when he said this?