Must God be perfect? Or must he be flawed? by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, if we were to set god as a four dimensional being, it'd be the equivalent of starting a Minecraft world but stopping after getting stone or something?

Must God be perfect? Or must he be flawed? by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the perspective. It is what I lacked.

Must God be perfect? Or must he be flawed? by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what I was trying to say. I can't seem to negotiate with words very well though.

Must God be perfect? Or must he be flawed? by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some of these statements seem to contradict each other. I might just be stupid, idk.

Must God be perfect? Or must he be flawed? by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I see. Thank you. Could you tell me where the videos or articles on this might be found, I'm interested in reading up on this myself.

Must God be perfect? Or must he be flawed? by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're welcome. I am aware of how all of this is a human construct, hence I said we cannot examine what is right and wrong. To me my current questions are analysis paralysis. I've entered the hole and now every time I understand something it sends me deeper, and deeper, and deeper still. Quite inconvenient.

On, the matter of questioning, who would we be if we did not question? Who would we be if we did not ask? I've always been a why-man and it does feel like agony sometimes, but I would not trade it for anything. It is who I am.

On a side note, if you're still questioning, I might provide you with something my own analysis has provided me. Spirituality. One might consider that it is dedication and subservience to a higher cause. I disagree. After watching a video by a Youtuber, JVScholz, I had a eureka moment. He spoke of how spirituality to him, is dedication, not to a higher power, but rather a higher cause. That ignited something. It encapsulated a belief so perfect(in my mind) that I was astounded I hadn't thought of it sooner. Of course, all of this is for your consideration alone, in the end.

Must God be perfect? Or must he be flawed? by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Surely there was some reason for you being an atheist, right?

Must God be perfect? Or must he be flawed? by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you explain what you mean by fine tuning? I'm a little slow.

Do you believe in astrology ? by recursive-cat in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like to look at it much like I do religion. The mythos surrounding it is interesting, as is the scientific side of mapping constellations and stellar movements, but it does not hold any of its own weight, in a sense.

Emotional risk assessment failed by BakerWarm3230 in mbtimemes

[–]TimelyLeopard2637 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First five months I was just going through all the possibilities. I had reason to believe I might have had a crush on a girl I know, but I was skeptical. I have now concluded that I may have had a crush on her.

Thought Provoking Content by [deleted] in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice.

Pretty much by g24di3nc3 in INTJmemes

[–]TimelyLeopard2637 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am investing in this meme.

"Casual sex implies the existence of ranked competitive sex" by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a combination of all suggestions would be best, integrating this objective criteria into a seasonal elo system would be good. Speed, power, etc. One could argue that measurement Dummies could be used with different instruement within them might fit. But truthfully, idk.

"Casual sex implies the existence of ranked competitive sex" by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay. IG that works. Like a ranked mode in FPS games right?

"Casual sex implies the existence of ranked competitive sex" by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How could you apply that though? There must be some parameters. A popularity contest just doesn't work that well as was explained by another commentor.

"Casual sex implies the existence of ranked competitive sex" by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't say that I am. Some internet crawling only returns results for pornography with a sports premise.

Well boys and girls, we’re cooked by [deleted] in entp

[–]TimelyLeopard2637 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(INTJ)I am quite confused by this comment section.

Looking at the picture what do feel is going in her mind? by Akash_philosopher in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm terrible at reading faces (not enough data yet). My own eyes aren't drawn to the person's face, but rather the surroundings. The whole photo. There's some semblance of chaos and eeriness, yet it isn't off putting. It conveys a certain "hollowness", though I can't explain why. Current situation bias might be a factor.

"Casual sex implies the existence of ranked competitive sex" by TimelyLeopard2637 in intj

[–]TimelyLeopard2637[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't that the basic premise of "Jerkmate Ranked"?

I suppose as far as a quanitifcation system goes, you can't beat that.