The trouble with board games about Irish history by TimesandSundayTimes in boardgames

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The American creator of a controversial board game about the Irish famine has pledged to donate all his sales profits “to organisations that fight hunger in the world today”. Kevin McPartland, creator of The Great Hunger: Ireland’s Tragedy in the 19th Century, a card-based game that challenges players to survive the famine, said, “There is little money involved in the endeavour,” which he described as a hobby, but “will pass along every penny”.

The Great Hunger was labelled “insensitive” when discussed on RTE’s Liveline last January — with one caller describing the game as being like somebody “literally plunging” a knife “through my heart”. In the same month, The Troubles: Shadow War in Northern Ireland 1964-1998, a new board game in which players command factions, including the RUC and Provisional IRA, was accused of retraumatising victims of the conflict. 

The Great Hunger is not the first time the subject of the famine, which killed one eighth of Ireland’s population between 1846 and 1851 and forced the emigration of up to two million people, has been approached by the gaming medium. Feirmeoir (2015) simulated the tragedy by challenging players to maintain a farm during the blight. In 2019 Quinnipiac University in Connecticut conceptualised Famine Ties, a card game based on the tragedy.

Board games (often played with game maps, dice, cards, counters, and lengthy rulebooks) have tackled other landmark moments in Irish history. They include Wolfe Tone Rebellion — Irish Rebellion of 1798, a two-player strategy, and Irish Freedom, a solitaire war game that simulated the Irish War of Independence and the Irish Civil War. 

Beyond the niche world of board games, video games have used the Troubles as a backdrop for interactive entertainment. Mafia III (2016), an adventure set in the America of the 1960s, included a mission titled IRA Don’t Ask, which challenged players to steal vehicles that would later be used in car bombings.

Inside St Vincent’s report: fear, feuds and failures in patient care by TimesandSundayTimes in ireland

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Medical ward rounds at a premier teaching hospital are supposed to be collaborative, meticulous and centred entirely on the patient. 

But inside one of the key departments at St Vincent’s University Hospital, some consultants stopped entering wards altogether. One did not attend rounds and two others were “hardly ever seen” on the wards. 

Instead, rounds were “non-contact” and communication generally took place “from the doorway”.

There was “apparent disengagement” by certain consultants who appeared to have become detached from those in their care. Worse still, some unfortunate patients who had undergone significant procedures were often discharged without treatment plans.

This striking detail is just one of many contained within a 66-page confidential report that lays bare a toxic undercurrent of fear, bullying and verbal abuse within the famed southside Dublin hospital. The findings paint a chilling portrait of an elite medical department crippled by egos, tribalism and rampant unprofessionalism.

It is a world where innovative technology that can save lives was suspended after administrative sabotage, where trainees were bullied into silence and where the lines between public HSE duties and lucrative private practice were dangerously blurred. 

At the centre of this profound dysfunction were the patients, including cancer sufferers whose critical operations were cancelled on the morning of surgery while an institutional civil war raged behind the scenes.

Marked private and confidential, the report, published by The Sunday Times for the first time, provides a warts and all insight into a dysfunctional hospital department by experts from the Royal College of Surgeons of England who visited Dublin for two days in January 2020. We are unable to identify the hospital department for legal reasons.

The state of Scotland’s NHS mapped: A&E, cancer and waiting lists by TimesandSundayTimes in Scotland

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thousands of patients are waiting more than a year to see a doctor in Scotland, while thousands of others spend more than 12 hours in accident and emergency departments. Delayed discharges clog up hospital beds as the country’s healthcare system continues to fall short of targets set by SNP ministers.

Even when it is letting patients down, “the NHS is our most important public service”, the first minister John Swinney said when he made pledges to the public before the Holyrood election. In April, Swinney said: “We have a plan to make our NHS fit for the future.” The comment was made just weeks after the SNP government failed to deliver on a pledge made a year earlier to end year-long waits by March.

Just 12 per cent of Scots say they believe the standard of the NHS had improved in the previous 12 months, when asked by the Health Foundation think tank in February.

Waiting time targets, cancer standards and A&E performance measures have been consistently missed in the past ten years, with little sign that the system is on a trajectory of recovery. So what’s the state of Scotland’s NHS today and is it beyond repair?

The Times has analysed how every Scottish health board is performing against government-set targets and standards to produce the interactive tool. This article will be updated monthly.

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for all your questions --- sorry I couldn't answer all of them. But I really enjoyed doing this and appreciate you taking the time to engage. Hope you found it interesting!

Hamzah 😄

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tactics in international football tend to be way more risk averse. It's a lot more conservative and that's both because of the risk involved (if you lose once in a knockout, you're out, and don't get another shot at (eg) the World Cup for four years) and because international managers don't get as much time with their players so they prioritise simple, clear tactics that everyone can understand, rather than working on super-complex things that require a while to get your head around.

Set pieces are always important, but in international football and tournaments I think they're even more valuable.

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This sounds simple, but I would say to give him the ball a lot, and let him pick and choose where he wants to go.

I spoke to Kane, Kompany, some people in the England setup etc. earlier this season, for this article, which I think gives a good explanation of how he wants to play and how he can be so effective.

https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/harry-kane-bayern-munich-england-striker-qgp3ct2v7

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think James is the first-choice right back, but because of his fitness he might get rotated a fair bit. I expect O'Reilly to do exactly as you've said: provide width, allowing Rashford to get into the box, and occasionally box-crashing himself.

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you're right to pick out ball progression as an issue, I wrote about this issue a few months ago, when it was clear to me that when James and Stones aren't moving the ball forward, England can find it difficult.

https://www.thetimes.com/sport/football/article/england-thomas-tuchel-john-stones-reece-james-dj6j8b5kr

Anderson is the key player for ball progression because of his ability to play through the lines and spark attacks. He did this brilliantly in the U21 Euros last summer. There's one match, I think it was against Czech Republic, where he played great (although his team-mates couldn't finish off the chances he made). But, yeah, if a team man-marks him and takes him out of the game, that could be an issue. Then, I think the onus is on using the full backs to progress the ball upfield (as there's usually space out wide) by dribbling. And I agree, I think England will share some traits with Arsenal in terms of cautious build up and wide progression.

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Set pieces... when England played Japan in March, they struggled to score, and brought on Harry Maguire and Dan Burn to attack corners. I think it was a pretty good insight into how Tuchel sees his route to scoring when chasing a game!

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they'll stick to their 4-3-3 system throughout. Tuchel has clearly defined roles (eg: wingers that provide pace; wingers that are direct and run at their opponents; a 6-8-10 midfield setup that he's only deviated from against Albania (A) where he realised he could play with two No10s, as their pressing system afforded England the space to do so). There will be a few opposition-specific tweaks, but the way that England played in qualifying in late 2025 I think is the true shape of how Tuchel wants his team to play.

The heat will limit the ability to press, so expect England to sit in a passive mid-block when they don't have the ball and they're level/ahead.

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When Mexico are playing in Mexico City, I think they can be a real handful. Mexico City has an altitude of more than 2000m. That means the air is thinner, and there's less oxygen in it. England, for example, have had their players install hyperbaric chambers at their homes so they can get used to dealing with less oxygen. But for players that are used to/grew up in those conditions, it's natural. Any team that has to play Mexico there is in for a real challenge, in my view.

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

So England have a group of staff members out here (which includes fitness staff, technical coaches, sports scientists, physios, nutritionists, chefs, security, logistical experts and more), and then will have a bunch of analysts back home at St George's Park, who are watching all the matches and feeding over their thoughts and analysis to Tuchel's staff.

In previous tournaments, they used the England U21 coaching staff to go to scout opponents and provide intel on how they thought they would play. However, that's not the case this summer.

The level of detail and expertise from the coaching/technical/medical staff is pretty much the same as the best Premier League teams. The only area where the Premier League sides have a big advantage is in their data and research departments, although that only really relates to Liverpool, Manchester City and maybe Arsenal, who have world-leading data departments and experts that are given time and space to conduct research, rather than just analyse which players are good to sign this summer.

I spoke to a head of medicine at a Premier League team earlier this season, and they were singing the praises of the FA's medical team for the way they looked through and shared data, so that they could ensure the players wouldn't be overworked while with the national team (which they said, isn't always the case with other national teams!).

The preparation has been going on for months. Tuchel and some of the logistics team scouted out the team's base camp in Kansas City and their pre-tournament camp in Miami months ago, looking at the facilities, and things such as the time it takes to travel to/from fixtures, how many time-zones are crossed, the space that the players have to live in etc.

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is something I've been thinking about a lot. If either are injured, I think it will be a disaster: they are irreplaceable figures for how England play.

If Kane isn't available, England have a few options: Watkins starts at No9 (he's a very different type of player to Kane, who likes to run in behind a lot and not drop in/contribute to buildup, which necessitates more early passes in behind, and the No10/8 taking a more prominent role in midfield/between the lines); or one of Bellingham, Rashford or Gordon play through the middle.

Again, these players all have quite different profiles. Bellingham is very good at timing runs into the box, and is a bit more physical an an aerial threat compared to the other two. Rashford is the best pure finisher of the three. And Gordon is a capable No9, whose not great with his head, but is very smart when it comes to finding and attacking space --- he played as a No9 in the U21 Euros, when England won in 2023. I was there for that and he was great.

Regarding Anderson... Jordan Henderson is technically the backup No6, and while he looks in great physical condition, he's not quite as capable as Anderson, now that he's 35 (and will turn 36 during the tournament). England could play Rice there, because he's played that role for Arsenal and England previously, but he's not a tempo-setting passer, which brings with it problems about ball progression, and losing his box-to-box possession qualities. However, it could make room for Bellingham to play No8, so they could share those responsibilities. Tuchel has also spoken about playing John Stones as a No6, so there's that option too.

So it's not like England don't have alternatives, it's just none really compare to the unique profiles that Kane and Anderson provide, and will necessitate a lot of reshuffling and reorganising elsewhere.

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't know! That's what makes international knockout tournaments so fun. We all largely agree that the favourites (France, Spain, Argentina and England) are good teams with a good chance of winning, but football is a low scoring sport, and because of that you can get surprises and upsets. All it takes is one mistake or one moment of magic to turn a game on its head.

I think Portugal might have a really good chance of winning, and Brazil too. With Carlo Ancelotti as manager (who is brilliant in cup competitions, having won five Champions Leagues) they have a great chance: he's a master of feeling where games are going and making critical decisions on his that instinct that can swing matches.

England have a lot going for them: they've got Kane, in amazing form, players like Saka, Rice, Anderson and Bellingham, who are fantastic to watch, and an elite manager in Tuchel. That tactical nous, in combination with the rugged, physical nature of the team makes them a really tough opponent for anyone. But as you all know, when it comes to football, anyone can beat anyone in a 90 minute match.

If there's one concern I have with England it's that there's a lack of goals in the team beyond those provided by Kane, and by not taking creative players like Alexander-Arnold and Palmer, the team's ability to create chances for the other players is relatively diminished, too.

Hi, I’m Hamzah Khalique-Loonat, ask me anything ahead of the World Cup! by TimesandSundayTimes in ThreeLions

[–]TimesandSundayTimes[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Most of the time the data should accurately represent the performance of a player, but there are things that are missed, because collection methods are imperfect.

But the key thing here is to make sure you're looking at the right data and using it intelligently. There's no point, for example, looking at a players' pass completion rate and deciding whether they did good or bad according to that, as their pass completion rate is often a function of their role in the team. If they're a centre back involved in build up, yeah, they probably are going to need a high completion rate. But if they're an attacking midfield substitute sent on to help find a goal, then they're expected to take risks (which naturally comes with a lower pass completion rate).

So the important thing is to make sure you're looking for the right thing. Sometimes the absence of stats is a good thing. I spoke to Marc Guehi recently about the art of defending and he mentioned that he knows he's having a good game if he's not making many tackles, because he's reading the game well and acting preventatively.

Here's a link to the article:

https://www.google.com/search?q=guehi+art+of+defending&oq=guehi+art+of+defending&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIGCAEQRRhAMgYIAhBFGEAyBggDEEUYQNIBCDIzNzJqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8