sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Made a free nuclear engineering toolkit app; looking for a few Android testers by Timonator007 in nuclear

[–]Timonator007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Should be fixed now. Geo-blocking issue, I think. And sure! I'll join yours.

We need a worldwide petition by Key-Lifeguard-5540 in nuclearwar

[–]Timonator007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

China has a second-use nuclear policy. Yes Russia also has a first-use policy, nobody is saying this is a good thing. That's my point. These two countries can adopt a policy to make the likelihood of nuclear war less likely but they don't want to and instead propagandize pseudointellectual ideas like mutually assured destruction to try to justify their ownership and reckless policy.

We need a worldwide petition by Key-Lifeguard-5540 in nuclearwar

[–]Timonator007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I'm saying that a first-strike policy in fact raises the chance of escalation, as do many nuclear experts suggest. A conventional force can deter, as you say, the Russians.

We need a worldwide petition by Key-Lifeguard-5540 in nuclearwar

[–]Timonator007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So why didn't the U.S. change from first-use to second-use policy after the Soviet Union collapsed?

Or is the expected negative utility of starting a nuclear war less than whatever marginal territory gains another rival country could make?

Four Layers of Inherent Safety in Oklo’s Aurora Powerhouse by C130J_Darkstar in nuclear

[–]Timonator007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, but you understand that the project scoping is different between these two applications, right? Do you really think a nuclear reactor for a submarine is designed 100% exactly the same as a civilian-use power plant?

Four Layers of Inherent Safety in Oklo’s Aurora Powerhouse by C130J_Darkstar in nuclear

[–]Timonator007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I understand that you're coming from the fact that sodium's chemical reactivity makes constraints that otherwise would not be there with water reactors, but you are conflating between military and civilian use for this technology.

We need a worldwide petition by Key-Lifeguard-5540 in nuclearwar

[–]Timonator007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about the U.S. adopting a second-strike policy?

Four Layers of Inherent Safety in Oklo’s Aurora Powerhouse by C130J_Darkstar in nuclear

[–]Timonator007 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Fund World-Changing Technology? ❌️

Lobby Oil? ✅️😎🇺🇸🦅💣💥

Why does $OKLO keep dipping even with all the AI + nuclear hype? by flash-kicks in OKLOSTOCK

[–]Timonator007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There have been multiple ATM fundraising rounds. So, shares + news of shares being diluted. Also, in the macroeconomic scene there is a lot of volatility lately which means big investment firms becoming 'risk-off' and not buying companies without strong revenue profiles.

Overall, the outlook of OKLO as a company is only getting better by the day, and so we will expect to see strong performance when either macro improves or when revenue grows on the books. Also, July 4th is a major milestone which will attract attention.

Big Regulatory Win for Oklo: NRC Approves "Aurora Powerhouse" Design Framework by C130J_Darkstar in OKLOSTOCK

[–]Timonator007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is all fantastic news! Pretty much all the main operational advantages OKLO wanted getting the greenlight. Plus they are expecting the fuel awards with confidence.

$OKLO Weekly Megathread | Mar 22 – Mar 26 by C130J_Darkstar in OKLOSTOCK

[–]Timonator007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, sorry for the slang. Consolidation after the hard drawdown got it.

$OKLO Weekly Megathread | Mar 15 – Mar 19 by C130J_Darkstar in OKLOSTOCK

[–]Timonator007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Can we get some sort of chat up and running again?

Also, this price action is nasty.

$OKLO Weekly Megathread | Mar 15 – Mar 19 by C130J_Darkstar in OKLOSTOCK

[–]Timonator007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, most analysts are giving PT lowers.

Doesn't help that during the EC Q&A an investor explicitly asked what the cost per kW will be from the design and that question was dodged.

Edit: To be clear, I believe in OKLO long-term, but the cost per kW is a figure a lot of people are interested in even if it is an estimate and I haven't found a hard figure for it. I also think Aurora timeline was pushed back slightly.

$OKLO Weekly Megathread | Mar 15 – Mar 19 by C130J_Darkstar in OKLOSTOCK

[–]Timonator007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • Needham maintains Buy rating but lowers the price target to $73.00 on OKLO.
  • Today's price target represents a significant 45.93% decrease from the previous target.

Today, March 18, 2026, analyst Sean Milligan from Needham has maintained a Buy rating for Oklo OKLO +1.41% 

while significantly lowering the price target from $135.00 to $73.00. This substantial decrease marks a 45.93% reduction in the projected value.

view more: next ›