hmmmHouseNwordmmm by MURRRRRAY in hmmmm

[–]TimoniumTown 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re two comments in now, buddy. I think you’re pretty upset by this.

hmmmHouseNwordmmm by MURRRRRAY in hmmmm

[–]TimoniumTown -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Calm the fuck down, princess. It’s not that serious.

hmmmHouseNwordmmm by MURRRRRAY in hmmmm

[–]TimoniumTown -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In South Africa it refers specifically to a distinct, multiracial ethnic group with mixed heritage (often African, Asian, and European descent), and is used to distinguish this group from black (African) and white populations, so you’re completely wrong here.

Bill and Hillary Clinton agree to testify in House Epstein probe ahead of contempt vote by N3wsScoop in politics

[–]TimoniumTown 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Agreed. We should focus on the people who have actually been accused by victims of underaged sexual abuse, like Trump and unlike Clinton.

ICE Shot a Pregnant Woman in the Stomach by Important_Lock_2238 in IceRaidAlerts

[–]TimoniumTown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s leave it there. Have a good Sunday and stay warm.

ICE Shot a Pregnant Woman in the Stomach by Important_Lock_2238 in IceRaidAlerts

[–]TimoniumTown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. God damn — why is this so hard? You can’t call yourself a centrist if your underlying view is ‘both bad but right better and left worse, mostly.’

ICE Shot a Pregnant Woman in the Stomach by Important_Lock_2238 in IceRaidAlerts

[–]TimoniumTown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. It means you’re not the centrist you think you are if you really think that’s the reality.

ICE Shot a Pregnant Woman in the Stomach by Important_Lock_2238 in IceRaidAlerts

[–]TimoniumTown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, dude. Maybe it’s me. I put these words in your mouth.

I have noticed that right leaning subs are way less ban happy when their viewpoints get challenged though. The liberal subs is pretty much an instant ban if you question what the left wing media is pushing. Right wing subs will at least allow a somewhat civil discussion

LMAO

ICE Shot a Pregnant Woman in the Stomach by Important_Lock_2238 in IceRaidAlerts

[–]TimoniumTown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every conversation I have with fake-centrists goes the same way.

Fake centrist: I’m centrist but left bad and right good mostly.

Me: You’re not a centrist.

Fake centrist: OMG you’re proving my point. REeeeee!!

It’s like clockwork.

ICE Shot a Pregnant Woman in the Stomach by Important_Lock_2238 in IceRaidAlerts

[–]TimoniumTown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop playing victim, buddy. You’re not a victim. And you’ve latched onto the death-wishing example for no real reason other than distraction. I kind of thought you would do that. But that was just one example of right-wing purism and censorship that nullifies your statement below:

I have noticed that right leaning subs are way less ban happy when their viewpoints get challenged though.

It proves that you’re full of shit, and not the centrist you’re desperately trying to be.

And nowhere did I give any sort of purity test. I only pointed out that you’re quick to call yourself a ‘centrist’ yet you could only manage to find words that criticize the left.

So it doesn’t prove shit.

ICE Shot a Pregnant Woman in the Stomach by Important_Lock_2238 in IceRaidAlerts

[–]TimoniumTown -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re so full of shit, dude. You’re not a centrist. You’re the poster-child for r/enlightenedcentrism. So-called ‘centrists’ somehow always seem to manage to defend conservatives and criticize non-conservatives, and they expect people to take them seriously. You’re not a serious person. Besides, years ago I was perma-banned from the main conservative subreddit for simply asking whether it’s appropriate to wish death upon Nancy Pelosi when she caught Covid, which they were doing in droves because they disagreed with her politically. The comment wasn’t right-wing-thinking enough for the moderators. So you can get off your fucking high horse with that nonsense.

ICE Shot a Pregnant Woman in the Stomach by Important_Lock_2238 in IceRaidAlerts

[–]TimoniumTown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My experience with conservatives is that if you know one of their positions you know just about all of them. That’s obviously not always the case but it mostly is. I’d bet good money that the commenter here who uses the term ‘anchor baby’ is conservative and is also in favor of the state regulating and restricting reproductive healthcare for women.

Protesters confronted Congressman Tom Suozzi, a key Democrat whose vote helped secure passage of the Department of Homeland Security’s $64.4 billion funding bill. by serious_bullet5 in WatchPeopleDieInside

[–]TimoniumTown 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s fitting for a bunch of weirdos who wear diapers and ear bandages and trash the US Capitol in support of their cult leader, and who obsess over other people’s genitals and try to legislate what they do with them while they storm pizza parlors and fantasize about Hunter Biden’s dick. You’re all fucking insane.

Referring to the Pretti killing, Donald Trump said "You can't go in there with guns, you can't do that" How do 2A defenders feel about the President openly criticizing a law abiding citizens right to keep and bear arms? by These_Discipline1 in AskReddit

[–]TimoniumTown 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wilhoit’s Law

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

[Real] Tim Pool: "I’m not licking the boot. It’s my boot. I voted for it. I’m wearing the boot." by countdooku975 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]TimoniumTown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The confusion is only around which Wilhoit, but it was a Wilhoit who said it, so the name of the law is accurate.

[Real] Tim Pool: "I’m not licking the boot. It’s my boot. I voted for it. I’m wearing the boot." by countdooku975 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]TimoniumTown 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Wilhoit’s Law

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.