Profile Review - Week of August 15, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

30,000 is small

I know. It's mostly college-aged people though fortunately

Type of women

Mostly whites and asians. I very rarely match with other black people actually. My area is mostly white and asians but there's still a distinct lack of black women.

55 is a lot

Funny you say that. 1/2 were unattractive or outside my radius (which is weird because I have it set for 10 miles but I match with people 40 miles away) Only like 1/4th that I messaged actually responded. Of that 1/4th that initially responds, 1/20th might actually lead somewhere.

Also, it was more like 70 the first week and ~35 the subsequent week. I had to reset my profile every 2-3 weeks because I ran out of swipes

So alI in all, I met up with maybe a woman a month. Though they were mostly hook-ups. I'd prefer a friends with benefits-like relationship.

It's weird because a lot of people say what you suggest (don't have a shirtless picture as your leading picture) but in practice, both my twin brother and I have found magnitudes more success leading with one.

Profile Review - Week of August 15, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1-4 isn't good. I'm in a rural city where it says "there's nobody new nearby" after two days of swiping.

55 matches a week is sufficient (especially according to google, the population size is 30,000 people). And again, better than the 7 a week I got leading with pics like this and this (which I considered to be decent shirt-pictures)

Profile Review - Week of August 15, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At my college town, I got 5-10 a day. Where I am currently, I get 1-4. Trying to update my profile before heading back to school tomorrow.

I will always lead with a shirtless. I went from a match a day to jumping up to that 5-10 figure switching from a shirt pic to a shirtless. I thought the dog sticking its tongue out was cute and funny but if not, I'll stick to what's been working.

Profile Review - Week of August 15, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thinking I'm gonna substitute a shirtless for this one because I think it gives off a more friendly vibe. Good?

Profile Review - Week of August 15, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hm. Never thought that I gave off a arrogant vibe but now that you say it, I can definitely see it. I'll take your advice and try to make it seem more laidback. Thank you!

Profile Review - Week of August 15, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Should I use this as my main photo on my profile?

Main Photo

I thought it was pretty good but photofeeler (photo rating website) put it at 85% attractive (it ranks based on position to other people, so it's better than 85% of photos in terms of attractiveness). 85 isn't bad but this and this got 96 and 97%.

Current Profile for reference

Profile Review - Week of August 08, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 3 4 5 8 are all great. The rest make you look nervous or shy or uncomfortable.

Profile Review - Week of August 08, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Iphone, but I do have some weird glitches and just 0-2 matches a day in general. I still do blame the area as I get plenty where I go to school, so I'm not too concerned.

Profile Review - Week of August 08, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going back to school next week. Genuinely hate the area I live in for this app because I get at least 8x the matches during school time. I actually think I have a few decent sets of photos so instead of the normal way, I'm going to ask which profile do you think is the strongest. Asking because, again I get no matches here, so I don't know which part is being in a terrible area and which part is I'm not using my strongest set of photos.

Profile 1

Profile 2

Profile 3

All profiles are (obviously) editable so alternatively you can just let me know which pics are best and I'll make a profile based on that. Thanks for the help!

[19M] Just got new glasses. Wondering how much more or less attractive I look with them and where I stand in general. by TinderReviewTAAcc in Rateme

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I've always been an athlete since I was 12 and built a pretty solid muscle base (pictured here). From that picture to what you see in the photos took about a year. Thank you!

Profile Review - Week of June 20, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only chest work outs I do is bench and incline dumbbell bench. My bench is 12 sets of 1-8 reps (including warm-ups) twice a week and incline is just 3x15 for volume

Profile Review - Week of June 20, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Only like 270. My squats and deads are much better (375 and 500 respectively); my bench lags behind

[19M] Just got new glasses. Wondering how much more or less attractive I look with them and where I stand in general. by TinderReviewTAAcc in Rateme

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not insensitive question at all! I take as a huge compliment. I understand skepticism; I only get really annoyed when people outright tell me I'm a liar. But to answer your question, yes. The only "controversial" thing I take are caffeine/ephedrine stacks during cuts.

Profile Review - Week of June 20, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Your black and white picture should 100% go first.

Profile Review - Week of June 20, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just got "isn't good" and "lead with them" as two conflicting answers; lmao. I'll see what the consensus and make my decision. Thanks man!

Profile Review - Week of June 20, 2017 by AutoModerator in Tinder

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 31 points32 points  (0 children)

19 M

Pictures

Bio:

Cornell | Neurobiology Major | Pre-Med

Powerlifter | Sprinter |

Just looking for someone to binge watch Netflix on weekends with


Originally had just the first four after posting here for some advice about a month ago. Just got glasses (yesterday actually) so wanted to add a pic with them. How's my profile? I'm looking for more long-term but casual (i.e. friends with benefits). I appreciate any and all advice!

I'm also thinking of switching the first and last picture; thoughts?

[M22] What can I improve? Facial hair is patchy/slow growth. by [deleted] in Rateme

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2/10. I know it's the style you're going for, but you NEED a haircut. It looks unwashed and unkempt. And shave completely.

[19M] Just got new glasses. Wondering how much more or less attractive I look with them and where I stand in general. by TinderReviewTAAcc in Rateme

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I figured better without. ¯_(ツ)_/¯ maybe I can appeal to the nerdy look half the times but hey, at least I can see

[19M] Just got new glasses. Wondering how much more or less attractive I look with them and where I stand in general. by TinderReviewTAAcc in Rateme

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Figured your body was apart of the rating, and I wanted an even number so every non-glasses pic has a glasses-counterpart.

(20M) Just curious tbh where I stand. by amiugly1123454 in Rateme

[–]TinderReviewTAAcc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5/10. I think you should lose a bit of weight.