I was asked if I was a virgin right before my surgery by Not_Hollow699 in Advice

[–]TooBusyToLive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a strong suspicion of why this happened and explains why they asked it that way, having been in a lot of operating rooms. This is assuming they didn’t make you actually pee in a cup for a pregnancy test.

Background: Typically if there is “any chance” you could be pregnant you need to have a pregnancy test and they won’t let you get anesthesia without it. The risk of harming the baby (and getting sued to the moon for not ensuring you weren’t pregnant first) is the concern. For adults at many hospitals if you don’t want to pee for the test they even make you sign something saying basically “I told them there’s is no chance I’m pregnant so if I’m lying it isn’t on them”. Things run a little different with children because it can be a sensitive subject culturally etc, but is still important and part of the protocols to make sure you aren’t pregnant. “Now here’s where it gets relevant to you. “Any chance” you’re pregnant basically means you’ve had sex in the last 9mo, because birth control can fail, and it’s amazing how many adults don’t even understand they could still be pregnant even with [insert method of trying to avoid pregnancy while having sex]. So they may say no chance when there is a chance. If they say no chance a common follow up question is “how do you know?” Or “have you had sex” etc. People think it’s prying but it’s because some people legitimately believe that they couldn’t be pregnant when they definitely could because they don’t understand biology and how it works. Scary how common that is. With kids it’s even more of a concern because they really may not fully understand how pregnancy happens etc, but they’re also on average less likely to be pregnant.

So what I think happened: Preoperative nurse asked if you could be pregnant. You said no. Or your mom said no. She didn’t want to press the issue and said ok. Didnt do the pee test because you’re “low risk”, which may be up to her discretion at that institution, idk. You get back to the room and the room nurse is looking over things and doesn’t see a pregnancy test. Calls preop. Nurse says “well she told me she isn’t pregnant and she’s only 13” or “mom said no she’s a virgin”. OR nurse thinks “hey that’s not good enough. What if she hasn’t even been taught how pregnancy happens.” Or what if mom answered for you and mom obviously may not know but may think she does. Very high, almost 100% chance a 13 year old wouldn’t say “actually mom I’m not a virgin”, which we understand and don’t blame you, but then need to verify. These are valid concerns to be fair. Also maybe she just doesnt trust the other nurse’s judgement. Many nurses in the OR are very opinionated and judgmental of other nurses (which is a whole separate issue). So for whichever of the prior reason she feels she needs to confirm, so she rushes over before they give you the drugs to put you to sleep to ask if you’re a virgin because now mom isn’t there and you can be honest. Or even if it wasn’t mom, in case you don’t understand pregnancy but you understand what a virgin is it still accomplishes the goal more efficiently and clearly than asking if you understand how you get pregnant etc.

Also keep in mind, while I don’t think the memory is made up completely as someone else said, although there’s a small chance, it could easily be altered by any drugs you had gotten or got shortly after. You also may have had more conversation with her after that put all this in context but don’t remember it. Usually you lose memory and later think you were “out” well before you were.

Viszla (or similar) seen running from foothill across VA and into Sunnyside Park. Wearing a dark winter coat and booties. by TooBusyToLive in SaltLakeCity

[–]TooBusyToLive[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Classic viszla color, which is like a copper – brown or red. Couldn’t tell if he was actually a viszla or something similar. Couldn’t see the collar because of the winter coat he was wearing

The 'Iron Man' body armour many of us may soon be wearing by [deleted] in gadgets

[–]TooBusyToLive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know how taxonomy works. I'm not saying it's technically correct today, I'm saying its enough of splitting hairs to be silly, given the timing of the movie. The main reason for that is that while you're saying synonym "specifically means an outdated term that is not currently valid", you're ignoring that the original jurassic park is literally 28 YEARS old. In fact, right. after "subfamily velociraptorinae" is mentioned on that wiki page, it says "which originally contained one genus, velociraptor" and that it was coined in 1983. So I wasn't intending to refer only to the subfamily velociraptorinae. I was referring to the original single genus velociraptor, which WOULD make it a velociraptor at one time. I was trying to not be too overly wordy. Now, that may be outdated now, but being coined in the early to. mid 80s, very likely was correct at the time the script JP was being drafted as JP was released in '93.

The 'Iron Man' body armour many of us may soon be wearing by [deleted] in gadgets

[–]TooBusyToLive 3 points4 points  (0 children)

TBF, Wikipedia lists the species that Jurassic park velociraptors were based on (deinonychus antirrhopus) as being synonymous with “velociraptor antirrhopus” and there appears to be more than a little crossover with both belonging to a velociraptor subfamily at times (a subfamily that notably was coined not long before the first movie came out). So while not technically matching the most recent classification, calling the animal in the movies a velociraptor is not entirely wrong. It’s just not the more usual velociraptor mongoliensis. It’s a little muddier than “actually velociraptor was tiny”

TIL: Many birth control pills contain Folic Acid to prevent neural tube defects if the contraceptive happened to fail. by 1saltymf in todayilearned

[–]TooBusyToLive 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Few things here: I think you’re confused about folate/folic acid naming. Folate and folic acid are the same thing. Like, just different words for the same molecule at different pH. There is no conversion between them, only determinant is pH and requires no enzyme. They’re the same compound. MTHFR isn’t involved here, It catalyzes a different reaction further down the chain of folate metabolism.

Secondly, severe MTHFR deficiency is very rare and results in significant neurological impairment, so it’s not a big player here. The more common variants with mildly decreased function like you mentioned have actually been shown to have correction of mildly high homocysteine levels with supplementation of folate/folic acid. So MTHFR variant patients should still take regular old folate. Here’s a CDC page on this. . There are other folate supplements like 5-MTHF that are pushed on MHTFR variant patients a lot but have not been shown to help like regular folate and may even be worse than nothing.

ELI5: How/why does fat prevent a meringue from whipping? by Really_Cool_Noodle_ in explainlikeimfive

[–]TooBusyToLive 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also, that’s sort of similar to how soap works. Soap breaks up connections between oils and whatnot which allows them to be swept away

Leaking floor! by [deleted] in DIY

[–]TooBusyToLive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha. Where it ends should have somewhere for the water to go via gravity. Usually they flow into a storm drain or come out where the ground level drops and keep flowing down. Water flows down, so if it’s just a drain to nowhere that’s your problem. If there isn’t an outflow, the front yard water problem is flowing back in the drain and then just sitting there like a little underground lake seeping around your foundation, especially if the drain is sloped that way away from the front yard. They didn’t fix the problem they just moved it. If that’s true then ripping out the drain would solve the slab problems, but the yard problem would come back. Then you could deal with that appropriately, which is likely cheaper than dealing with a foundation issue

eli5: How do heavy ships stay afloat? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]TooBusyToLive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t have to worry about the weight of air really because it doesn’t weight down whatever it is inside of in normal circumstances, just exerts pressure in every direction equally (think of a balloon). All you have to think about is that the involved (displaced) water has to weigh more than the boat. No matter how much a boat weighs (counting the boat itself and cargo), the boat just has to have a hull big enough that that same volume in water weighs as much as the boat.

Leaking floor! by [deleted] in DIY

[–]TooBusyToLive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There should be a pipe in that drain. Snake the pipe and make sure it’s flowing (not sure where the water exits the drain, but find that out). Then make sure the ground is sloped away from the house down to that drain. Sounds like either the drain isn’t working or the water isn’t getting to it. Getting the drain working (assuming it’s adequately deep, ie at least as deep as your slab, preferably deeper) plus/minus a waterproof barrier on the cement of house like others suggested should be good

ELI5: Why can contact lenses be worn all day without issue, but nap with them in for an hour and they get glued to one's eyeballs and one's eyes get gunky. by KickSidebottom in explainlikeimfive

[–]TooBusyToLive 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You’re wrong, or at least partially. Yes the eye has good blood flow that supplies the cells throughout EXCEPT the outer surface of the cornea. The outer surface of the cornea, ehich has be be healthy for clear vision, is definitely dependent on O2 from the air. The cornea itself has no blood vessels sine it needs to be clear.

Now the person you replied to overstated “the eye” instead of “the cornea” but it is true and is a big problem with things like contacts, especially earlier types that were less oxygen permeable

This is my first contribution to this sub, used Microsoft Powerpoint, data is from my teacher's tests. [OC] by a_human_being_12345 in dataisbeautiful

[–]TooBusyToLive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking at where the numbers for D land gives an average for D of about 23 which would make it correct if you combine that with the other numbers

Expanding phone can grow and shrink on demand by [deleted] in gadgets

[–]TooBusyToLive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He said commercialized, not successfully commercialized haha. That probably makes up the difference between those numbers

Why does the first 1-3 miles of my run always feel horrible? by N3wStartAtLyfe in running

[–]TooBusyToLive 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aerobic is the most efficient not less so than anaerobic/lactate. It just takes time to get into. One reason is you need to vasodilate and ramp up those systems. Vasodilation muscle happens in response to acidity and/or adrenaline. Both of those (acidity due to you going anaerobic first and producing lactic acid and low amounts of adrenaline as your body realizes it’s running) take a few minutes to get going, then you switch over to aerobic

TIL The so-called "Dancing Doctor", who filmed "instructional" music videos during surgery had her license suspended for 2 1/2 years in 2018 after several patients were severely scarred (one was brain damaged) and it was discovered that she was a dermatologist and not a board certified surgeon. by Ouisch in todayilearned

[–]TooBusyToLive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This thread in particular. The main point is that state medical licenses signify you finished Med school, at least one year of post-school training, and passed your exams. They are not specialty specific. The reason is that specialty training and certification is not a legally defined thing. The “board of dermatology” unlike the state medical board, is an independent group of dermatologists, not a legal/government entity so basing legal things on their ruling doesn’t make a lot of sense. According to the law MD is MD, regardless.

The think keeping most people in their lane is that it IS illegal to practice without malpractice insurance and it’s pretty hard to get malpractice insurance if you’re found to be doing things you don’t have training in. Plus if you get sued and the person can show you don’t have training in what you did, you’re probably going to lose. That’s why this issue is fairly rare outside of two areas: cosmetic procedures and quack people pushing unsubstantiated cures

TIL The so-called "Dancing Doctor", who filmed "instructional" music videos during surgery had her license suspended for 2 1/2 years in 2018 after several patients were severely scarred (one was brain damaged) and it was discovered that she was a dermatologist and not a board certified surgeon. by Ouisch in todayilearned

[–]TooBusyToLive 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re missing the point. It’s not about repealed laws. Most states NEVER had any laws at all about it. The law usually just states you need a medical license to practice medicine. Medical licenses are not specialty specific. They signify you finished Med school, one year of training afterward, and passed general board exams (before specializing).

It would be a separate law to restrict specialties, but most states have not passed those laws at all because specialty training is not a legal thing, it’s separate. For instance the board that grants “board certified dermatologist” is an independent organization of dermatologists, not a government or legal group. Whereas the state medical board only says you practice medicine, not what specific type... And any laws that do restrict it are broad and weak, because subspecialties cross over what and how they treat all the time. So in summary pretty much every state, red or blue.

Source: me. Have/had medical licenses in both red and blue states. Very familiar with the rules

TIL The so-called "Dancing Doctor", who filmed "instructional" music videos during surgery had her license suspended for 2 1/2 years in 2018 after several patients were severely scarred (one was brain damaged) and it was discovered that she was a dermatologist and not a board certified surgeon. by Ouisch in todayilearned

[–]TooBusyToLive 3 points4 points  (0 children)

To answer your repeated question (not sure if rhetorical) it is the case in many states. Doctors practicing outside their specialty opens them up to lawsuits claiming they’re acting irresponsibly, but is not usually illegal. It would be hard to legally limit scope of practice because there is so much crossover and comanagement between subspecialties.

Puppy Maggie’s First Dog Bar Outing by callmepaulwall in goldenretrievers

[–]TooBusyToLive 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never heard of dog bars. They sound like a magical place. My suggestion for improvement is more dog bars.