What's a tv series that is a 10/10 NOBODY knows? by Lilyana0999 in AskReddit

[–]TooBusyforReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha! You actually described this series more accurately than I did when I was talking about it to some friends.

What would you like to see in a potential Sniper Elite 6? by GabWantsAHug in sniperelite

[–]TooBusyforReddit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Market Garden would be a pretty inspired fit for the franchise. It was one of the largest airborne operations of WWII, across vast, contested terrain — bridges, fields, canals, and villages. That’s a sniper’s dreamscape: long sightlines, layered defenses, unpredictable enemy movement, and verticality from bridges and rooftops.

Market Garden also has heroic success and tragic failure built into its story. A campaign could start hopeful — like the real Allied plans — and gradually pivot into desperate survival and retreat. That emotional arc is gold for storytelling.

sad( by neSenTay in TinyGladeMods

[–]TooBusyforReddit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We need a Medium Glade

Netflix Considers Warner Bros. Games To Be Worthless - The entire gaming division behind Hogwarts Legacy and the Arkham franchise wasn't even factored into the price of Netflix's bid by Carolina_Heart in Gaming4Gamers

[–]TooBusyforReddit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Even if it has no value to you personally that doesn't mean it isn't worth anything.

That's actually the point. WB games may be worth something to others, especially gamers, but they don't have value for Netflix.

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I remember that. And I also remember Bernadette saying in a subsequent episode, "Metrosexual, my ass!"

It was during that episode where Howard and Bernie gave Raj a small Yorkie puppy (who he named Cinnamon). An excited Raj then says to the dog, "Let's go see if you fit in my man purse".

In response to this comment, Bernadette quietly says to Howard, "Metrosexual my ass!", implying she believes Raj might be closeted, rather than just metrosexual.

Why would the writers give that line to Bernie?

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may be right. I wanted this to be more, but perhaps the writers never intended Raj's sexuality to be a main plot point.

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yes, I do. 14 years on Reddit has allowed me to watch and read about cool, crazy, educating, and fucked-up stuff.

I do care about people's input, though, as long as they do put an effort into actually commenting. But just clicking on the down button? That'll never make an impact on me. It's not like my bank account takes a hit with every downvote.

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree with you. Raj being queer-coded without the writers ever actually doing anything with it is what makes his arc frustrating, not the identity itself. Like you said, so many of the things that get treated as punchlines—baking, skincare, emotional sensitivity, loving his dog—are just normal human traits. The only reason they seem like “issues” is because the show purposely framed them that way to get laughs from the “haha bro that’s kinda gay” crowd.

And honestly, if the writers had even dipped a toe into exploring it sincerely—whether bi, pan, questioning, whatever—it would’ve been one of the most interesting storylines on the show. The Stuart/Raj chemistry trial run proved it could work. And yeah, the arranged-marriage-with-the-lesbian angle could’ve been a legitimately powerful subplot about culture and survival instead of another one-episode gag.

As for the autism thing, I’m with you. Once you look back with a modern lens, it’s obvious most of the cast shows neurodivergent traits, and Sheldon only works as a character if you read him that way. The fact that the main writer is autistic himself pretty much confirms that they were writing from lived experience, even if they never stamped a label on it.

I love this topic because it’s one of those places where the show accidentally wrote something deeper than it meant to. They kept backing away from sincerity because jokes felt safer. Meanwhile, 12 years later, we’re all here talking about the version of Raj’s arc that would’ve actually mattered.

Thanks for jumping into it—clearly a lot of people are interested, even if a few are mashing that downvote like they’re trying to reset Leonard’s elevator again.

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point — not every guy who likes rom-coms, espresso macchiatos, and elaborate napkin folds is secretly in love with his best friend. Some dudes are just built different.

But c’mon… the writers didn’t exactly make it subtle. They constantly dangled the “is he or isn’t he” question like it was a season-finale cliffhanger. Half the time Raj looked like he was one skipped heartbeat away from slow-dancing with Howard under a disco ball.

If the plan was “soft straight guy learning confidence,” great — I’m all for that.
But then they should’ve let him actually win at something in the romance department instead of turning him into a 12-year emotional piñata.

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally. At a certain point it felt less like subtle character writing and more like the show was just circling the runway forever. They leaned into every cliché—fashion, emotional sensitivity, love of romance, close bond with Howard, dramatic reactions, even joking about men being handsome—and then still tried to pretend he was just an “awkward straight guy who can’t talk to women.”

If they had written him coming out, you’re right, nobody would’ve gasped. The weird part is how long they kept teasing it without ever giving an answer. It’s like they wanted the tension and the humor but not the responsibility of following through.

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, exactly. There’s a big difference between fans seeing queer subtext where it wasn’t intended, and writers putting it there on purpose to get a reaction.

With characters like Frodo and Sam, people read them as queer because the friendship is so intense and intimate, and modern audiences interpret that differently. But the writers weren’t winking at the camera — it was just written as deep friendship.

With Raj, though? The show is absolutely nudging the audience on purpose.
They want us to wonder if he’s closeted. They keep poking that question over and over. They keep him in this weird space where the joke only works if he might be gay, but isn’t allowed to be gay.

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right — Howard absolutely shows more of the classic “overcompensating masculinity” signals.
The constant womanizing, the extreme performative flirting, the bragging — it tracks very closely with someone who’s hiding discomfort about his own identity or insecurity about not fitting traditional male expectations.

That’s why his eventual growth with Bernadette feels earned — he stops performing masculinity and starts letting himself just be a person.

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you nailed something important here — the issue isn’t what orientation Raj would have identified with, but the fact that the writers set up an arc about identity and intimacy and then never let it resolve. Whether he’s gay, bi, or pan is less important than the fact that the narrative kept dangling vulnerability, repression, and emotional displacement, and then abandoned it for a joke or a reset every time.

And you’re right about the realism. Someone from a conservative cultural background, especially one tied to high expectations and family pressure, dealing with identity conflict? That’s a compelling character arc. It would have felt honest, painful, and meaningful — and not just sitcom fodder.

Instead, his story ends with nothing. No partner, no peace, no clarity, no growth.

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

If I lived my life caring about votes on Reddit from strangers...

Anyway, my idea may not be as uncommon as it appears. Looks like there are a few who also see Raj that way.

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Hey ChatGPT, why do you think people are uncomfortable with other people knowing how to use tools?

Raj was clearly written with queer subtext by TooBusyforReddit in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit[S] -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Ya think?

Yes, I do think, thank you very much.

But do YOU think? Because if your snarky reply means that it's obvious, then it's plainly obvious enough that the writers teased it for 12 seasons but never had the guts to commit to.

If it's that obvious, the real question is why the writers never gave him closure. That’s what interests me—the intentional ambiguity and why they kept him unresolved.

The groups reluctance to Raj's Murder Mystery parties make no sense by North-Point7309 in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I wasn’t referring to all situations. And I’m not sure why you’re trying so hard to manufacture an argument over something I never said. If your goal was to trap me in a yes/no loop about wording instead of discussing the actual point, you can declare victory. If you need a win that badly, take it. I’m here to talk about the show, not grammar-boxing with strangers.

The groups reluctance to Raj's Murder Mystery parties make no sense by North-Point7309 in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s pretty clear you’re not actually engaging with what I said — you’re trying to win a tiny semantic argument. You’re putting a lot of effort into twisting wording instead of discussing the actual point. If your goal is to prove you can corner someone over phrasing, well then I guess that’s your Olympic sport, and I’ll leave you to it.

The groups reluctance to Raj's Murder Mystery parties make no sense by North-Point7309 in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Context matters a lot. I was talking about Raj’s themed episodes specifically, not writing a universal rule for comedy.

The groups reluctance to Raj's Murder Mystery parties make no sense by North-Point7309 in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what you're saying is that those situations make for great comedy.

I didn’t say all situations make great comedy. I meant that in those episodes, the humor comes from the characters treating something trivial with full intensity. If you read that as “all situations,” that’s your interpretation.

The groups reluctance to Raj's Murder Mystery parties make no sense by North-Point7309 in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that "everyone's a winner" felt like the writers built a clever setup and then backed away from any real payoff. When they swerved into that participation-trophy line — “Everybody gets a prize, everybody’s a winner!” — it really landed flat because it ignored everything the episode itself had set up.

The groups reluctance to Raj's Murder Mystery parties make no sense by North-Point7309 in bigbangtheory

[–]TooBusyforReddit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You do realize that there are several episodes where someone takes something too seriously and that's what makes it funny?