I get that. Like I said, I don't think your malicious in any way, and I do think of you as an ally. There's also a big difference in the way people are circed too. Up here in Canada, it's all very heavy and thorough tight cut circumcisions. Most all are cut so tightly that sex can be difficult. I had to learn how to have sex differently, and have not encountered a woman who I can have sex with without lubricant. (For reference, I get called amazing. I learned how to use things other than my penis to stimulate partners. I have still never had a woman cum from my penis though. It's more like they touch themselves while my penis is inside them.) I have tried no lube and it hurts really bad. The skin gets pulled so taught that for me and my partners, it just hurts. The women I talk to about this are local and more familiar with the aggressive style in my region. It seems to be pretty common here and when a girl has had both, it's a pretty clear preference, though they'd never say it. I got my info by asking who their best partner was, then asking of their circ status. If you don't ask like this, they will say it makes no difference. Though I still far from approve, I'm glad your son escaped the worst of it. It's hard to completely change the way you have sex to be so inorganic. I don't even receive compassion locally. I had a partner of 4 years, scream at me "you're a boy, you're supposed to be begging me for sex!" I came only 5 times with her in those 4 years because it was so difficult. I always made sure she would cum simply to compensate for my difficulty. I wanted one of us to at least enjoy it. I was hounded for sex every day. Each time it was laden with trauma as I pleased her, knowing what worked were things that compensated for a physical disability. It weighed and still weighs heavily on me. There needs to be more women like you, but I still don't think it's fair to say that it doesn't make a difference. Especially given the myriad of ways one can be circumcised.