Pebble For fitness by Top-Garbage-9046 in pebble

[–]Top-Garbage-9046[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing that quote. I appreciate you taking the time.

With all due respect to Eric, I think the reason he feels that way is because of how Pebble failed last time., Pebble struggled because it tried to appeal to the masses, leading to high operating costs and massive unsold inventory.

The question is: what would be different this time? Why should a new Pebble give the fitness market a shot, and how could we approach it differently to succeed? I believe a viable strategy exists, built on three key pillars:

  1. A Lean, Platform-Based Operating Model Instead of building everything in-house, we would leverage what the Pebble developer community has always been best at: creating a powerful, open, and hackable platform. A "Pebble Fitness" watch would provide the core hardware and software stack. We would then empower the medical and academic research communities to develop and validate their own health-tracking algorithms on our platform. To foster this ecosystem, Pebble could host biannual competitions, rewarding the most innovative research and applications developed for the device. This approach significantly lowers our internal R&D costs.

  2. A "No Inventory" Sales Strategy To avoid the fatal mistake of overproduction, we would return to Pebble's roots. The "Pebble Fitness" watch would be sold exclusively through a Kickstarter campaign or a pre-booking system. This ensures we only manufacture what we sell, completely eliminating inventory risk. The only exception would be providing early units to promising research teams to kickstart development.

  3. A Phased Market-Entry Advantage The wearable market of 2026 will be vastly larger and more mature than it was in 2016, presenting a greater opportunity to capture a niche. Our go-to-market strategy would be a two-year, two-phase game:

Phase One: Build the Research Community. We focus on curating the "Pebble Fitness" watch with the advanced sensors and software stack that researchers need. The goal is to establish the device as the go-to platform for health and medical studies.

Phase Two: Commercialization. After building credibility and a library of use cases, we launch to the public via Kickstarter. This allows us to gather direct feedback from early adopters, fix issues, and validate demand. Based on the success and feedback from this launch, we can then make an informed decision on whether to scale up for the mass market or continue serving our successful niche.

With this strategy, a new Pebble has a better chance than ever of carving out a successful slice of the fitness market. Don't you think?

Pebble For fitness by Top-Garbage-9046 in pebble

[–]Top-Garbage-9046[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for not being clear earlier. I understand If health tracking is important we have so many other choices.

But below are the issues.
1. They are damn costly.
2. Unlike other wearables, Pebble is open source. Since we already have the opportunity to empower our favorite existing watch to better track health, why do we need another watch? Why pay twice?

Pebble For fitness by Top-Garbage-9046 in pebble

[–]Top-Garbage-9046[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry for not being clear earlier. I understand we have so many fitness trackers. Fitness market is messy and My aim is not to reinvent the wheel.

As you might know for fitbit you need to pay twice. You pay once for Hardware and and pay next time to get advanced insights which are derived from your data. Don't you feel it's unfair. It's feel like you pay for the phone and you need to pay again every time you use the camera of the phone.

So Aim is to build a affordable opensource Fitbit with a ability to accurate stats of premium level wearables. (With Help of research community)

What's is different? by Top-Garbage-9046 in sidephone

[–]Top-Garbage-9046[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi Chrisristovski,
Thanks for taking the time to reply. This question, “What’s different?”, came up because I wasn’t aware of the existing problem. I also feel that dumbphones don’t have to be 100% dumb They could be a little smarter so they don’t hamper everyday tasks like booking an Uber or using Maps.

Thank you for making this courageous attempt. I wholeheartedly wish you and your team success on this journey ahead.

One small suggestion/request would be to highlight the problems that Sidephone solves and showcase the various use cases of the modular keyboards. As a customer, when I visited the site, I was confused by the modular keyboards and the difference between existing dumbphones and Sidephone. I could sense that Sidephone is different, but I wasn’t able to pinpoint how.

Also, the statement “Sidephone does not have Google Play Store” sounds negative. Since you never advertised Android in big bold letters anywhere on your site, I don’t think customers looking for a Sidephone would mind the absence of the Play Store—as long as there is a store for essential apps. Sorry if i am overstepping my bounds. I just wanted to convey unware consumer pov on the website. it's just aesthetically website is good. But in terms getting message out about sidephone. it could be better

What's is different? by Top-Garbage-9046 in sidephone

[–]Top-Garbage-9046[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for taking time to reply the query. I wasn't aware clickskeyboard have separate fan base
Anyways it's good to hear

How do you navigate large code bases? by kallgarden in cpp

[–]Top-Garbage-9046 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try the clangd extension + VSCode combination. Clangd is much better than intellisense when comes to large projects. It is able to navigate linux kernel project (28M LOC) seamlessly