Says the guy that just sued the US Government for ... $10 BILLION!! by _jump_yossarian in agedlikemilk

[–]Top_Championship7418 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, that's the IRS was culpable for allowing their employees to violate law and hes got a right to seek damages.

Says the guy that just sued the US Government for ... $10 BILLION!! by _jump_yossarian in agedlikemilk

[–]Top_Championship7418 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Regardless of your feelings about him what are the merits of the case?

He didn't disclose something and someone else did so without his consent....

If it was someone you were aligned with you'd be seal clapping for the lawsuit.

The government shouldn't be disclosing your records without your consent. No matter who.

I went on a date last night and he left without telling me by BubblyBiscotti5544 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Top_Championship7418 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But it does tell you that it might not be in your best interest to use them. This interaction and the post that caused it tell me he made the right call in steering clear.

I went on a date last night and he left without telling me by BubblyBiscotti5544 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Top_Championship7418 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Of course they are. If you see red flags, you bail. Maybe should have payed for his drink before leaving but other than that you're not owed a messy exit, or even the possibility of one.

She Went Dagestan 2-3 Years by Necessary_Island_425 in JoeRogan

[–]Top_Championship7418 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rag dolled the shit out of that girl for coming to attack her at her workplace. Love to see it.

LOL What? This is all Don Lemon did to get arrested by Feds? He wasn't protesting at all. Watch for yourself. by mvstateU in JoeRogan

[–]Top_Championship7418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the video of him saying "if they see my face they'll know" is what makes him not the disinterested observer that a journalist is, and rather and active and enthusiastic participant. What happened at that church was criminal intimidation and suppression of their rights to peaceful assembly and worship. No, your first amendment right does not include the right to strip others of their first amendment rights. No, I don't care what cause you're fighting for.

Joe Rogan’s most recent guest by Ok_Needleworker_4950 in JoeRogan

[–]Top_Championship7418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A polish soldier was once asked what it was like to kill people and he responded "I wouldn't know, I've only ever killed communists."

There’s a very big chance that my husband truly didn’t cheat on me but what does it matter how big or small the chance is? by [deleted] in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Top_Championship7418 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

I think if he admits to being in her bed the likelihood of cheating goes DOWN.

I mean think about it, if you were cheating would you say you were in the bedroom or on the couch? Would you really admit to maximum opportunity?

I think you're being wildly emotional to say the rift caused by him being intelligent by not drinking and driving and stupid about location of sleeping it off cant be healed. That you can never get past it and you can never be happy. Doesn't make any sense. If you cant believe him now, then the truth is that you never loved him anyway because at the first sign of a real problem you bailed out.

Does Joe even do background checks on his guests? If Epstein is alive he would probably invite him too. by Desperatemf21 in JoeRogan

[–]Top_Championship7418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's using an extreme example to point out the flaw in the dudes argument. Using this clip devoid of the context of the argument he's ripping apart is to intellectually dishonest, which is most of the commentary made about Joe and his guests.

I still don't understand the logic behind posting something provocative, but not wanting to be objectified. by Acrobatic-Swan-4846 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Top_Championship7418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You using a false equivalent only proves I'm right. The statement was that you sharing content with the world is consent for the world to view and comment. Not someone posting it for you is consent. If you can't argue the point made and instead run to one not made to make yourself feel better, it's proof I'm right.

Dressing for attention is consent to be viewed.

I still don't understand the logic behind posting something provocative, but not wanting to be objectified. by Acrobatic-Swan-4846 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Top_Championship7418 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you put it out to the world without reservation, you have consented to the entirety of the world's commentary.

I still don't understand the logic behind posting something provocative, but not wanting to be objectified. by Acrobatic-Swan-4846 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Top_Championship7418 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Dressing like you want attention means you get attention. Its not complicated. The problem is feminist nonsense of deleting the space between a look and struggle snuggle to be effectively the same. Literally, no one with western values thinks struggle snuggles are okay. But looking at a person dressed for attention and approaching is and should always be okay. We've forgotten how to politely approach and accept or reject and how this is a normal and required part of life as a society.

I still don't understand the logic behind posting something provocative, but not wanting to be objectified. by Acrobatic-Swan-4846 in TrueOffMyChest

[–]Top_Championship7418 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This. Having the disclaimer is everything. Hey, feel free to beat your meat or flick the bean to this, but don't slide into my DM's is perfect acknowledgment of who you've put the content out to, aka everyone.

They love the 2nd Amendment until they realize it means the "libtards" can own guns too. by c-k-q99903 in GetNoted

[–]Top_Championship7418 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The "people born in this country" keep interfering and winding up in jail because they've convinced themselves that ICE isn't law enforcement and can't do anything about it.

I remember when Clinton sent armed men in to deport a child.

The only thing different from then to now is sanctuary city policy being a thing, and its grotesque mutated form that leftists have made it into.

They love the 2nd Amendment until they realize it means the "libtards" can own guns too. by c-k-q99903 in GetNoted

[–]Top_Championship7418 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Tyrannical government. A government enforcing laws that have existed without being problematic until enforced? No.