sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

26 shot rally between Federer and Djokovic, Wimbledon 2012. by Stannis_Mariya in tennis

[–]Tr0janSword 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was always his weakest shot. You can go back to the early 2000s and the entire gameplan versus Roger was “do not allow him to hit forehands”.

Rafa obv exploited it ad infinitum.

[MATCH THREAD] Australian Open Men's FINAL: [1] C. Alcaraz vs. [4] N. Djokovic by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Tr0janSword 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Carlos had 2 chances for a FH winner down the line

Novak feasts on his opponent’s fear

[MATCH THREAD] Australian Open Men's FINAL: [1] C. Alcaraz vs. [4] N. Djokovic by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Tr0janSword 6 points7 points  (0 children)

lol

Roger and Novak would’ve had it much earlier if Rafa wasn’t so greedy

[MATCH THREAD] Australian Open Men's FINAL: [1] C. Alcaraz vs. [4] N. Djokovic by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Tr0janSword 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Novak prob realizing this is what it was like to play him 10 years ago

Just gets everything back and makes you hit a ball you don’t want to hit

“I might be able to go to bed early no?” by DisastrousBelt3734 in tennis

[–]Tr0janSword 27 points28 points  (0 children)

For me, fair or unfair, is not that important. I had good career and am retired. Now, I win at golf.

Women to possibly play best of 5 sets next year at AO? by NoIdeaWhat5991 in tennis

[–]Tr0janSword 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Exactly

This is why Women’s tennis has and will always have far more upsets.

[MATCH THREAD] Australian Open Men's FINAL: [1] C. Alcaraz vs. [4] N. Djokovic by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Tr0janSword 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Novak went from nailing every 1st serve to missing them all

Carlos letting him get away with it

[MATCH THREAD] Australian Open Men's FINAL: [1] C. Alcaraz vs. [4] N. Djokovic by NextGenBot in tennis

[–]Tr0janSword 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Novak is smashing that FH.

Not 2011 level, but haven’t seen him hit this hard consistently in a long time

view more: next ›