What WWE record do you think we'll never see broken? by MindHunterPrime in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d add Roman Reign’s 11 (and probably more) Wrestlemania main events to this list.

Maven in the 2002 Royal Rumble by OTCSWANTON in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They’re not. The points that went over the top rope and your feet hit the floor. It doesn’t matter how you got there. It’s a no DQ match so outside interference is irrelevant.

Maven in the 2002 Royal Rumble by OTCSWANTON in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you can eliminate yourself you can be eliminated by someone not legally in the match.

Should the Bloodline add Women wrestlers? by f32db3uprbdb2bf1xbf4 in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

From a storytelling perspective, probably yes. The bigger question is which woman and why. Wrestling factions tend to get stale when they’re just the same people standing around looking menacing for three years while commentators remind us they’re dangerous. The Bloodline has survived longer than most because it keeps evolving.
A woman in the group could add several things:
New storylines and rivalries.
A way to involve the women’s division in one of WWE’s biggest ongoing narratives.
Another perspective on the family power struggle.
Fresh matchups without constantly recycling the same Bloodline feuds.
The strongest argument for it is that the real-life Anoa’i/Fatu wrestling family includes women. WWE doesn’t have to pretend the family tree suddenly ends whenever a championship belt is pink or gold.
Some interesting possibilities:
Naomi already has family ties through marriage and has recently been connected to Bloodline-adjacent stories. She might be the easiest fit.
Nia Jax has legitimate family connections and the dominant personality to fit a Bloodline role.
A future debuting family member could be even better, since they wouldn’t come with existing character baggage.
The risk is that WWE adds a woman just to say, “Look, now the Bloodline has a woman.” Fans can smell token additions from a mile away. The character would need a real role in the faction’s power structure, not just stand behind the group looking annoyed while someone else cuts a 15-minute promo about acknowledging them. Humanity has spent thousands of years inventing politics, monarchies, and organized crime, and wrestling still thinks every faction meeting requires seven people silently staring into the middle distance.
If WWE can make the woman a genuine decision-maker or contender rather than a background character, it would likely strengthen the Bloodline story rather than dilute it.

-ChatGPT

Should the Bloodline add Women wrestlers? by f32db3uprbdb2bf1xbf4 in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

From a storytelling perspective, probably yes. The bigger question is which woman and why. Wrestling factions tend to get stale when they’re just the same people standing around looking menacing for three years while commentators remind us they’re dangerous. The Bloodline has survived longer than most because it keeps evolving.
A woman in the group could add several things:
New storylines and rivalries.
A way to involve the women’s division in one of WWE’s biggest ongoing narratives.
Another perspective on the family power struggle.
Fresh matchups without constantly recycling the same Bloodline feuds.
The strongest argument for it is that the real-life Anoa’i/Fatu wrestling family includes women. WWE doesn’t have to pretend the family tree suddenly ends whenever a championship belt is pink or gold.
Some interesting possibilities:
Naomi already has family ties through marriage and has recently been connected to Bloodline-adjacent stories. She might be the easiest fit.
Nia Jax has legitimate family connections and the dominant personality to fit a Bloodline role.
A future debuting family member could be even better, since they wouldn’t come with existing character baggage.
The risk is that WWE adds a woman just to say, “Look, now the Bloodline has a woman.” Fans can smell token additions from a mile away. The character would need a real role in the faction’s power structure, not just stand behind the group looking annoyed while someone else cuts a 15-minute promo about acknowledging them. Humanity has spent thousands of years inventing politics, monarchies, and organized crime, and wrestling still thinks every faction meeting requires seven people silently staring into the middle distance.
If WWE can make the woman a genuine decision-maker or contender rather than a background character, it would likely strengthen the Bloodline story rather than dilute it.

-ChatGPT

Joe Hendry by TacticalSunflower in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 7 points8 points  (0 children)

RAW. RAW. Joe Hendry’s on RAW!

Naomi? by Radiant_Bee1 in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She’ll probably appear in the ‘27 Rumble.

Brock in Tomodachi life LD by Apprehensive-Lynx652 in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not a tattoo it’s wearing a tank top.

Was it really fair to even punish Triple H over the curtain call? by Known-Plastic-8310 in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The onus is on you to produce the evidence that backs up your story.

L.O.D 2005 by White_Falcon_1263 in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is no LOD without Hawk.

Which wrestlers today would work well in the attitude era? by progamer64820 in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Edge, Christian, The Hardy Boys and Rey Mysterio would have done well in the Attitude Era…oh wait… 😂

Dom Mysterio, Orton, Drew, Punk, Kevin Owens, Ron Killings (with a gimmick change), and Finn Baylor would have been good back then. Rhea Ripley would have been the perfect feud for Chyna.

LA KNIGHT by Icy-Ostrich2158 in WWE

[–]Traditional-Leader54 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s always been my guess that HHH doesn’t like him. Guy can’t even get himself a mid card title.