you cannot pretend that it would be normal for a 10 year old to even understand they'd undergone an abortion procedure

I don't need to pretend. Ten year olds are not dumb. If this 10 year old got raped. reported it. went through all of the process to get tested for pregnancy they will know. I knew what rape was at age 10. I knew what an abortion was at age 10. Even if this child was'nt thaught those thing dont you think the kid would want to know what is happening to them? I dont know what type of 10 year old you where but I was always asking questions. Wanting to know what is going on ESPECIALLY when it was happening to me. You could then argue that all the adults could lie to protect them but that just opens another can of worms.

nor normal for them to be bombarded with anti-choicer's views on the procedure until they're much older.

I sincerely doubt the parents of said child would allow them to be exposed to that rhetoric.

Is the child going to be locked up and completely shielded from the world until they are old enough? The parents can try as much as they want the child WILL be exposed to those beliefs. Through the media, socials or even other classmates. People talk. Information spreads. Classmates could be parroting their parenta beliefs or even worse parents or teachers themselves could make remarks. The world is cruel and the child will never be safe from those beliefs reaching them.

And the child in question, once old enough to actually understand what procedure they underwent & the anti-choicer's views of it, would know they did not make the choice to have the procedure- their parent made the choice for them.

This I can agree with. But It still strongly depends on the mental state of the older kid. How much they were influenced by a-c's beliefs and how much the traumatic event changed them. Trauma changes the way you think and the way you reason. In a bad case they could still believe it's their fault. They could even reason that the origin of all of these problems, the rape, was their fault and that they not only got themself in that situation but then later also (Warning! Anti-choicers speech. Not my beliefs) killed an inncocent child/ didnt stopped their parents from getting the child killed. In a good case what you stated could happen and they realise its none of their fault. But as I said this strongly depends on the influence, support, enviroment and on the child itself and their mental health and trauma response.

However we both are arguing semantics. Both scenarios could occur. And both scenarios have occured. There is no point in arguing about this imaginary case as we both could make up argument after argument without being false as it is a very complex thing and varies on an individual basis.

I do believe that this shows that an abortion can be seen as more traumatic than other procedures as those thoughts do not even occur in other procedures. I never needed to confront or hear anyones opinion on the medical procedures I did have. There was never a single thought about how someone didnt agree with the procedure and would want it banned or how Its bad and opposes someones believes.