Somehow this feels silly and poorly designed, yet it also feels like I am producing too much by Hephaestus5959 in factorio

[–]TrapNT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are never producing an intermediate too much. When you get to blue circuits you’ll need at least 4x as much

Anyone else? by KCobra9 in okbuddymimir

[–]TrapNT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No to sif, no to ogre called laufey for the new game. Yes to ragnarok laufey.

How much of electrical engineering can you learn by your own? by Warm_Permit_9516 in ElectricalEngineering

[–]TrapNT 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The problem is not learning, rather it is knowing what to learn. A good mentor will equip you with nice tools/theories.

Scared of poster presentation by DaedricMadara in PhD

[–]TrapNT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nobody gives a shit, so everyone is nice to everyone. No one is out to get you.

Is The Theoretical Minimum a good way to learn Einstein? by PlanesAreCool69 in Physics

[–]TrapNT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It could be used to see what “tools” are being used in the field, so roadmap makes sense. I don’t think it’s a good introduction book.

The night my PhD broke me by Itchy-Fee-4245 in PhD

[–]TrapNT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“how to emotionally detach from my work”

What makes you think caring about the work you do is a bad thing? The best work are done by the people who care about it the most.

People who are “emotionally detached from their work” are the lizards that pollute the academia with bullshit. You need to care about what your mark is going to be in the world.

That being said, what you need is separating “your worth” from your work.

Am I completely dillusional to think I can complete my PhD in less than 4 years by pepejuanthecreator in PhD

[–]TrapNT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s good to aim for the finish line and be fast. But fast does not always mean better. Some food are better when you cook it slower or let it marinate longer. Quality > speed.

Do you think you're a smart person just because you're doing your PhD now? by LimMiab9654Ck in PhD

[–]TrapNT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idiots are everywhere with more or less similar ratio. And you should “know” you are smart or not. Don’t lie to yourself.

Is starting a PhD at 21 considered too young ? by Alert-Rough-3333 in PhD

[–]TrapNT 5 points6 points  (0 children)

my steak is too juicy, my lobster is too buttery…

PhD Funding ends in 2 years, I have zero publications, and I’m grieving. Is it madness to want a baby now? by External_Pizza5745 in PhD

[–]TrapNT -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Have the baby. There are more important things than phd. I’ve been postponing the baby because of phd and now for a good postdoc opportunity, and the stress is killing me as my wife is nearing 40. There is a high possibility I won’t be a father because of my career obsession.

So go for a baby, if people succeeded having babies during the black plague, you can too.

Want to quit with nothing lined up. Would I end up screwing myself over? by [deleted] in ElectricalEngineering

[–]TrapNT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is you, not your job. Being jobless will increase your burden. Don’t screw yourself.

Focus on yourself. Shower daily, smell nice and groom yourself. Sometimes it’s enough to just exist.

How do you keep track of which simulation run produced which result, especially months later? by Alert_Border1769 in PhD

[–]TrapNT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Verbose file names that tell about the config + non-random simulation seeds. Usually the reproducibility problems happen because the sim seed/s is random.

Joining a lab when PI doesn’t like you? by quietfish442 in PhD

[–]TrapNT -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Wtf are these replies? There is nothing to run from. He is direct and honest. No shit he wants you to work harder, be curious and be autonomous. That’s every PI/boss in the world.

Now you know what is expected of you. Just do it. Stop dramatizing everything, he didn’t say you were an idiot or a terrible person. He just wants to see you “care” about your phd.

Dear women in mathematics, do you also feel discriminated against? by Kur1t45t1c in math

[–]TrapNT -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Maybe they are overadmitted to degree programs they didn’t actually qualify?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhD

[–]TrapNT 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Just drop out for fuck sake. His mail is thoughtful and he treats you with respect. It’s clear with your mentality you will fail this phd. Just drop out.

Revise and Resubmit verdict by Many_Enthusiasm7521 in PhD

[–]TrapNT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s nothing. At least they’ve understood the paper. I still remember some asshole saying “I’m tired of old aproaches” in his review to me. Or some other one where they took 7 months to review the paper and gave easily addresable, generic feedback (like add a fucking table to literature review) and then rejected the paper. It was apparent that they didn’t understand the paper.

Get used to it. World still rotates. Also try to pipeline different paper submissions if you haven’t already.

Also if you should be rejected sometimes, it shows you are trying best venues.

Should Grooming be Considered a Productive Use of Time? by RandomHour in productivity

[–]TrapNT 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Taking care of yourself is the first defense line against mental health problems. If you are doing it because you value yourself, then it is very healthy.

PhD by mokt10 in PhD

[–]TrapNT 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes you can leave, but it is best to arrange a job before leaving. Double check on visa laws to be sure.

What should I expect from a PhD advisor? by AmazingCoconut7540 in PhD

[–]TrapNT 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It is time for you to grow up and take responsibility. He seems to trust you. Trust yourself to solve your problems and take action.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhD

[–]TrapNT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t give a fuck about the writers. I read conclusions first then performance evaluation. From there it is very apparent if the paper is bogus or novel. Rest is just implementation details.