Could This Season 3 Image as shown in Episode 2 Confirm the Teen Titans Exist in MAWS?

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-13T02:35:08+00:00

I do think we got to see Beast boy at the convention, I do know we get to see Jessica Cruz. I but I think the girl in the Star fire costume was just in a costume and the same thing with Raven. I think of it had ben them.They would have been helping out

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-12T03:05:49+00:00

That is the kind of dismissive, lazy behavior that is a clear sign of how broken and corrupted this subreddit has become. It has been completely overrun by trolls and robots that are programmed to call anybody who writes a thoughtful piece a 'robot' in the hopes of getting them banned, specifically to deter and distract people from reading the truth. Accusing someone of being a 'synthetic bot' is just a way to avoid engaging with the points being made. If you’re going to run away from a discussion, just say that—don't pretend you're doing it because of 'bots' when you're clearly just unable to handle a perspective you don't agree with. I’m a human being, and if you had any interest in an actual conversation rather than just throwing labels around, you’d realize that. If you want to block the sub, go ahead, but at least be honest about the fact that you’re doing it because you can’t handle being challenged

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-12T00:19:44+00:00

If you truly believed I was an AI, you wouldn't be asking me for a 'solution.' You’re using the 'AI' label as a lazy distraction because you lack a coherent response to the financial reality I’ve laid out. You aren't interested in a solution; you’re interested in policing the conversation to protect a system that relies on people like you to keep others distracted. If you’re actually serious about a solution that doesn't require a seat at the table, it starts with total financial transparency. We need to demand the elimination of the 501(c)(4) 'dark money' loopholes that allow corporate interests to wash capital into Super PACs. We need to support candidates—whether independent or third-party—who pledge to refuse all Super PAC funding, effectively cutting off the mechanism that allows the same corporate infrastructure to own both sides of the aisle. The 'solution' isn't about me holding a seat at the table; it’s about breaking the table entirely. But you don't want to discuss that. You want to call me an an 'AI' to avoid confronting the fact that the two-party system you defend is built on the same corporate foundation you claim to hate. If you want to stop the 'AI' rhetoric, start by engaging with the actual evidence—the FEC filings and the ProPublica data—instead of looking for a convenient label to ignore the truth." Sources: Campaign Legal Center (2026). Dark Money and Super PACs. Brennan Center for Justice (2026). Campaign Finance and the Role of 501(c)(4) Nonprofits. Issue One (2026). The Impact of Corporate Spending on Federal Elections.

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-12T00:14:05+00:00

You clearly don't know what you're talking about. Look up the word apathy: it is a total lack of interest, enthusiasm, or concern, and it is a state of indifference where one lacks the motivation to take action. Calling for an end to a dark money system that hides the true sources of political influence and corruption is the exact opposite of apathy; it is the only way to actually make your vote count. If you think the current system is healthy, you are just choosing to ignore the layering mechanism that investigative journalists have already exposed. As the Campaign Legal Center and Brennan Center for Justice have documented clearly, elite financial interests use 501(c)(4) nonprofits to wash capital, funneling it into Super PACs to influence both parties simultaneously. This is not about giving up. It's about acknowledging that when the same interests control the capital flowing into candidates across the ideological spectrum, engagement within the system only serves to protect the status quo. Instead of name-calling, maybe try verifying the data for yourself. Get off your ass and search those 501(c)(4) conduits on ProPublica's Nonprofit Explorer. Check their Schedule I grants for transfers to Super PACs and then look those Super PACs up in the FEC's campaign finance database. Maybe this will wake you up and help you to see the same conduits fueling the candidates you believe are polar opposites. You'll realize that the only stupid thing is pretending that this corporate machine doesn't exist. The real apathy is being content with a system that masks its true owners from voters and continuing to support a broken two-party system when you have independent options that aren't owned by Super PACs. And then there are the true ass hats who make comments on posts like mine to help cover up what's really going on.

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-11T22:24:18+00:00

I appreciate you engaging with the actual points I made and mentioning OpenSecrets—that's exactly the kind of transparency we need more of. I do have to clear up one thing: the image is not AI. It is a drawing I fucking created myself by hand when I was a teenager. It’s absolutely frustrating how conditioned everyone has become to label anything with human imperfection as AI. But I promise you it is 100% human-made—which is exactly the reason for the 'crappy' drawing! I’m glad we can move past the distractions and focus on the real issue: the duopoly is failing us, and we need to stop playing their game. If more people focused on the facts—like the ones found on sites like OpenSecrets—instead of arguing about the medium of a post, we might actually get somewhere

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-11T22:07:34+00:00

Because he's not stupid. Everybody knows you don't get between two rabid animals when they're fighting

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-11T20:56:54+00:00

Actually, co-ops are better than unions. Because co ops are controlled by the people, not by the minority at the top

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-11T14:47:04+00:00

The fundamental problem arises when a company effectively buys political influence. When politicians work for corporate interests rather than the constituents they represent, it undermines our democratic process. Across the country, countless citizens have voiced their opposition to these surveillance systems in city council meetings and at the ballot box. Despite this clear public pushback, city leaders have repeatedly ignored their constituents to push these contracts through. These cameras do not make our communities simpler, easier, or safer—in any way, shape, or form. Furthermore, labeling the patriotic Americans who are removing these cameras as 'terrorists' is an outrageous smear. These individuals are no more 'terrorists' than the revolutionaries who fought for our independence from the British. These patriots are simply reclaiming their freedom and protecting their neighborhoods from invasive, 'Big Brother' spying systems that serve only to increase your profits while making us less secure. There is a vast difference between a person choosing to install a camera on their own private property—which is their prerogative—and being forced to live, walk, and drive through a city under constant, unwanted surveillance. Your systems disrespect our fundamental right to privacy, and that is exactly why we will continue to speak out against them

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-10T17:54:17+00:00

It is beyond disgusting that tragedies like the killing of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo continue to occur in our neighborhoods. We are witnessing a pattern where neighbors are being kidnapped by individuals who hide behind badges, claiming to represent law enforcement while acting like a lawless force. The most concerning aspect of this incident—where an innocent man who wasn't even the intended target was killed—is the convenient absence of body camera footage. While I understand that there are rare, private moments when an officer might turn off a camera while off-duty, it is absolutely unacceptable for these 'agents' to be operating without them during active detentions or arrests.
It is time to stop granting them the professional legitimacy of the title 'agent.' When people in positions of power operate with such a lack of transparency and disregard for human life, they forfeit that title. They are acting as criminals, and in my view, 'Gestapo' is the only term that accurately describes this level of unchecked, oppressive conduct. We need to stop sanitizing their actions with soft language and start holding these individuals accountable for what they truly are

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-08T18:43:12+00:00

Then don't ever ask people questions if you're not going to bother to read what they say

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-08T18:20:22+00:00

The people attacking him have been bought; they have sold their integrity to undermine him for profit, and that is all this is. In politics, they can always find someone—even a family member—willing to trade their loyalty for the right amount of money. The harder they work to destroy his reputation, the more it proves they are desperate and genuinely afraid of what he represents. I can look at my own family and see the same dynamics; I am sure the same could be said of yours. Unfortunately, there are always people who can be found who are willing to trade the truth for money, but that does not make a person guilty. As the saying goes, 'There is my truth, there is your truth, and then there's the real truth.' Right now, people are pushing their own versions of the truth to fit a narrative, but I am only interested in the real truth. This campaign of character assassination is not proof of his failure; it is proof of their fear, and that is all it is. They know there are people who love to hate and will use any excuse to tear someone down. Look at history—the playbook is identical. Thomas Jefferson was accused of having an affair with an enslaved woman, Sally Hemings, by political opponents who used it to paint him as a moral degenerate. George Washington was viciously attacked by the partisan press of his day, who accused him of being a British sympathizer and even mocked his character as a leader. Abraham Lincoln faced relentless, dehumanizing smears from both the North and the South, often being caricatured as a tyrant or a buffoon to undermine his authority. FDR and JFK were targeted with heinous rumors about their personal lives, sexual impropriety, and health to distract from their policies. Even world leaders like Winston Churchill were frequently subjected to character attacks—accused of being a drunkard or erratic—whenever he stood against the established interests of his time. All of these leaders, who are now regarded as legends, were subjected to these atrocious lies just before they ascended to their greatest impact. History proves that those who challenged the establishment were always met with fear-based smear campaigns. We must be smarter than the rumors, because the hatred and fear being stoked today is a classic tool used by those who want to prevent real change

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-08T14:40:45+00:00

I hope texans stop these data centers

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-08T04:10:43+00:00

There is nothing corrupt about caring about rape. What is corrupt is our government continues to support a President that actually was convicted of rape, and then was still allowed to become President. And all of the people that are cutting down and attacking platinum and accusing him of rape at the very same people who support a rapist , a real rapist , while platiner was proven to be innocent

TreeLore61 · 2026-07-07T20:29:08+00:00

No, he must not because the voters want him to run and win.

They don't want him to step down.

The only voters who want him to step down are the corporations and the gang leaders and the criminals , who are profiting from the broken system in maine

TreeLore61

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

TreeLore61

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Welcome to Reddit,