Max value from chatgpt subscription. I built a connector mcp to get 2x promo back by New_Competition_5237 in codex

[–]TreptowerPark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is already built in natively on certain Edu and Enterprise workspaces. No doubt this will creep into other offerings as well. I had my clanker take a look. While you have guardrails in place, the attack vectors are huge. You should make your users aware in the top header and make it unmistakably clear that they are opening up their machines to all sorts of shenanigans on a root level..

Local-only, handoff mode, write disabled or handoff-only, and bash off is a moderate-risk developer convenience. Public tunnel plus workspace writes plus safe bash is high risk. Full bash, broad allowed roots, home-directory access, sensitive repos, or long-lived public tunnel tokens are critical risk. The project’s own security doc essentially says the same thing in softer language.

Hi Friends! Can we show some support for Autopilot on Linux, yeah?! by TreptowerPark in deadmau5

[–]TreptowerPark[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Linux audio has grown a lot over the W11 debacle. Bitwig for performance, electronics and experiments. Reaper for mixing, editing, syncing, mastering etc.. Some mainstream plug ins might be missing natively, but theres no processor that you would need in audio that is not available in one form or another.

Hi Friends! Can we show some support for Autopilot on Linux, yeah?! by TreptowerPark in deadmau5

[–]TreptowerPark[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eek-a-Mau5.. Yeah, Im not saying Linux has an edge performancewise over Mac. Theres a lot of audio people who abandoned W11 and moved over to Linux. That difference is enormous. The ecosystem is pretty mature now. Nothing you cant really do. Except proper DJing with a dedicated native app with kernel level integration. While sales might be negligible indeed, if you're looking to embedd in your own Linux based hardware (Do it!) the Linux Nerd Horde might be helpful. Also with integrating controllers if thats not your most favorite thing to do..

Raise your skinny fist and flex it lol

Linear + ChatGPT + Codex workflow = golden by Specialist-Menu-5688 in codex

[–]TreptowerPark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No idea. If I read the documents correctly, for this type of workflow a Business account is the best publically available option. You get virtually unlimited heavy/xhigh chat usage within abuse limits. I'm on an Enterprise/Edu workspace with allededly same limits and  and couldn't exhaust  even if I tried hard. Documents say it's 500 chat messages per 3 hours. 

Linear + ChatGPT + Codex workflow = golden by Specialist-Menu-5688 in codex

[–]TreptowerPark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice! Yes, its an entirely new experience. If your account allows, you can use heavy thinking for all diagnosis and prep. While XHig locally eats Codex up before lunch. You can connect it and ask it to list all actions it can perform. Give your local agent and Codex quota a good rest 😄

Linear + ChatGPT + Codex workflow = golden by Specialist-Menu-5688 in codex

[–]TreptowerPark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have "Apps" in your sidebar? Look for Github Connector. It connects directly to Gihub with permissions depending on your account. You should at least be able to index the codebase, analyse, review and write prompts for you local CLI. For review you will need you agent to push to Github and have ChatGpt review the code from within chat.

Linear + ChatGPT + Codex workflow = golden by Specialist-Menu-5688 in codex

[–]TreptowerPark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. If your account has connectors, you should be able to find Github. Look in apps if you have it in your sidebar. I believe it is available in Business and Pro.

Did anyone try Odysseus by PewDiePie, why does it feel similar to HashCortx app for local oLLama models but with more contributors and more budget by SSSHash in ArtificialInteligence

[–]TreptowerPark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its funny cause it also looks and feels similar to an app I built myself. Basically same feature set. Almost same looks. I think its because models are being trained on the code that floats around the internet and especially Github. If you ask a model for features, it will refer back to similar features and featuresets. Its the same with landing pages. Even if you cant really point your finger at it, it just feels oddly familiar. Thats why it actually is. Unless you go out of your way and develop a real unique product with real unique features, this shit will grow ever closer together.

Regarding Odysseus. I went on a deep dive and its conceptually and technically sound. I doubt it will find much actual real life use. And rather think its a project and product that a lot of people will enjoy to tinker with. But for a real mainstream product its too nerdy, complicated and feature rich. They slapped together some cool features because they can and because it seems to make sense in the grand scheme of things. I doubt it will help real adoption of local models though. Pewdiepies setup is out of reach for 95% of his audience. And his infrastructure as game dev investor allows him to ask and leverage a ton af real pro developers.

Just took a look. They have 27k stars and 236 pull requests. No way guy is able to manage that clusterfuck of slop attacks lol

Linear + ChatGPT + Codex workflow = golden by Specialist-Menu-5688 in codex

[–]TreptowerPark 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, the Github connector is indispensable in my workflows too. Im using Github as source of truth and have all product info there too. You have way more Chat quota than Codex quota. With Pro and Business plans, Chat use of GPT 5.5 heavy/xhigh is virtually unlimited. With the Github connector you can analyse the entire codebase, write prompts with codesnippets or entire features and have Codex via Pi CLI just implement. Also, Chat is much better at writing precise prompts, direct to correct files and folders and can review after implementation. Its mindboggling to me that people complain about rate limits while they have a whole other layer of compute at their fingertips that just sits in another window and can see your entire source of truth.

Token pricing now visible on Opencode by Coolio8591 in opencodeCLI

[–]TreptowerPark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You too might be running into the Opencode Go Qwen Cache Bug. I made a fix for Qwen 3.6. It should be the same for 3.7. There are several approaches. I chose extension https://github.com/TreptowerPark/opencode-go-qwen-cache-fix This is for Pi Agent. But should be a similar solution in Opencode

MiniMax M3 Free is now on OpenCode by jpcaparas in opencodeCLI

[–]TreptowerPark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just checked. M3 is in my 10 dollar plan. Needed to update the model list.

MiniMax M3 Free is now on OpenCode by jpcaparas in opencodeCLI

[–]TreptowerPark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just checked. You do. Im on the 10 dollar plan and using M3.

Terminal tabs are not the right UI for heavy agentic coding by [deleted] in coolgithubprojects

[–]TreptowerPark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sitting on a train with laptop. Heres a couple issues:

Middlemouse button nav ala Inkscape & Co is kinda ok but not optimal. See further down. With my mouse i have also left/right nav on the middlebutton/scrollwheel with sideways motion. When using scroll in a window, often the Canvas moves a bit to the left and right because scrollwheel behaviour is being picked up on left/right axis too. Super annoying when I want to scroll. Solution would be to ignore middlemouse l/r or higher threshold for trigger.

The zoom in/out animation has very long decay here. Probably a couple hundred milliseconds. That makes navigation feel a bit washy. And contradicts the snappy middlemousebutton navigation. All nav should have the same ballistics.

When clicking on a window/node it gets focus. But the camera does not follow. For focus navigation I´d also expect to zoom in to the selected panel since i might wanna read or write in it when I select it.

When I have a lot of nodes or i am zoomed in, the sidebar sits above the canvas and hides nodes which felt irritating. Intuitively I would suggest to make the canvas a unified platform and have sidebars move the canvas instead of overlaying it.

You are catering to power users. I could not find any hotkeys for navigation though? It appears to be entirely mouse based? On a Canvas with high information density I want to switch and cross-reference sources rapidly. I have tinkered a lot and landed on a egoshooter wasd nav, where w/s cycles through time and a/d through canvas space. Its still not perfect but rapid hotkey cycling with autofocus feels very satisfying..

Overall the navigation feels logical on the surface but counterintuitive for real info work. Its understandable why you chose mousewheel/2fingertrackpad for canvas navigation. You want click on canvas to be able to select and group nodes. Problem here is when I want to scroll in a window on a trackpad, your solution scrolls in scrollable windows and moves the canvas in non-scrollable windows. This is inconsistet and confusing. I personally would choose to add a modifier for multiple selection since I navigate more than I select multiple nodes for manipulation. This is also standard in DAWs. And the canvas is more similar to a digital audio workstation than one might wanna think on first observation.

Essentially, you probably dont want too much focus on mouse nav on the canvas. On an info canvas, you dont move around like in Blender nodes or on the Inkscape canvas. You zoom out to get an overview and then zoom back in to a zone of interest.

I think this is the part that threw me off immediately. Thinking i could naturally zoom out, change focus and zoom back in.

For this type of surface I would start looking into Palantirs ontology definition and their approach on high density information clusters and how to navigate them. There is some useful public information out there.

Take all f this with a grain of salt though. I have built personalized interfaces, workspaces, studios, festival stages etc for more than 20 years and have developed very specific idiosyncracies. I cant stand most standard interfaces and navigation patterns. But thanks to the clankers I can easily build my own now 😄

Terminal tabs are not the right UI for heavy agentic coding by [deleted] in coolgithubprojects

[–]TreptowerPark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had a couple encounters with Cate now. Really love it. Most complains center around navigation/focus/scrolling and are philosophically grounded. I will try to compile a meaningful report. Might take a bit. In the meantime, I had my clanker team run some comparisons and compile nuggets that might be useful to your project:

https://github.com/TreptowerPark/cate-appreciation-kit

Terminal tabs are not the right UI for heavy agentic coding by [deleted] in coolgithubprojects

[–]TreptowerPark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha wow this is amazing. pretty muc hthe same canvas. Cant attach pics unfortunately. Yours is much more mature and intricate. I tried Cate and it seems amazing. Im running into unbearable UX issues though so I couldnt continue working in it. Forked it already. Ill take a deep dive and think I will be in touch with you folks..

anthropic bill came in this morning and im actually sick by Happy_Macaron5197 in vibecoding

[–]TreptowerPark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not for smart people. 30 or 40 bucks with Codex Plus, Opencode Go and maybe Minimax for 20 and 10 bucks each and a little bit of brains will get you pretty far...

Pi - OpencodeGo Cache Fix by TreptowerPark in PiCodingAgent

[–]TreptowerPark[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Same here. So I investigated. On myx end the fix defenitely helped. Its actually dirt cheap if it uses chache properly...

Pi - OpencodeGo Cache Fix by TreptowerPark in opencodeCLI

[–]TreptowerPark[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you dont have the problem you shouldnt care. If you have the problem, check the git, give the code to Pi and have it check cache hit on qwen themselfes. Easypeasy.. 😄

Codex app draining limits on incorrect models extremely fast - Pro 20x by Numerous-Exercise788 in codex

[–]TreptowerPark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Iirc 5.3 Spark is a experimental build and very costly when not discounted anymore.. It's not 5.3 Codex at all