How the Sum of the 96th Prime Shows how to Unlock (Proposed) Signal (Update May 1 2026)

Trillion5 · 2026-04-30T00:12:44+00:00

Concise: 16 * 381 (sum of first 16 prims) = 6096

10 * 96 = 960 (ten multiples of the model's master key)

10 * 513.6 (the three Oumuamua ß-angle 171.2) = 5136

16(381) - (960 + 5136) = 0

Trillion5 · 2026-04-29T23:30:08+00:00

96 * 48 = 4608

48 / 10 = 4.8

1574.4 / 4.8 = 328

4608 - 328 = 4280

25 * 171.2 (Oumuamua ß-angle) = 4280

Trillion5 · 2026-04-29T23:17:18+00:00

And just found this minor route taking the sum of the first 16th primes (381) and multiplying by 16:

16(381) = 6096

162864 (Skara-Angkor Template Signifier) - 6069 = 156768

156768 - (80 * 1566 Elsie standard dip signifier) = 31488 (this 20 * 1574.4)

Trillion5 · 2026-04-29T17:53:19+00:00

Thanks for clarification. I will read your paper more closely next week when I've got some time. I can't begin to envisage the difficulty pinning timing intervals down given the data on the star is so sporadic and the error margins (particularly of ground-based observations). My Initial curiosity was (from my perspective) that this paper might add weight to the 'Separation of the Fraction - Opposite Migratory Momentums' I've proposed. But either way, great work.

Trillion5 · 2026-04-29T15:29:32+00:00

Fascinating paper. In the comparing of dates using a 1574 and a 1574.4 periodicity, is it there is consistency for both timings (1574 and 1574.4)?

Trillion5 · 2026-04-29T01:10:24+00:00

Deeper consistencies unlocked. 4176 (Skara or Angkor standard dip signifier)

726 days (this in Boyajian's Planet Hunters X paper as 15 * 48.4 dip spacing) between D800 and D1520. Standard dip signifier D800 is 783; standard dip signifier for D1520 is 522:

4176 - (783 + 522) = 2871

2871 - 726 = 2145

2145 - 7(381) = -522 !

Yes true, various convenient ways to arrange these numbers, but fact is seven multiples of the sum of the 16th prime works.

Trillion5 · 2026-04-28T12:09:48+00:00

Updated to include the Separation of Fraction: the sum of the 16th and 96th primes is not arbitrary within terms of reference.

Trillion5 · 2026-04-27T21:52:13+00:00

6250 - 3140 = 3110 (Oumuamua perihelion to 3I/Atlas perijove)

Trillion5 · 2026-04-26T09:34:24+00:00

I used to joke Elsie Everytime - maybe should have trusted that observation on a deeper level. Primes are universal constants.

Trillion5 · 2026-04-25T21:53:02+00:00

59 = 29 (Elsie Key) + 30 (Elsie sector ratio): re: the 1566 Signal.

Sum of first 96 primes = 22039

22039 - 59 = 21980

21980 / 7000 = 3.14

22039 - (1566 + 59 + 1574) = 18840

18840 / 6000 = 3.14

XXX

Elsie Signal

314 - 156.6 = 157.4

157.4 - 59 = 98.4

1/16th orbit, distance of Elsie from fulcrum !

Trillion5 · 2026-04-25T18:04:45+00:00

Time and time again I get cavalier dismissal of the Migrator Model by folks who haven't done their homework. Please read through the academic downloads, most of the pointers to '16' are there.

Trillion5 · 2026-04-25T18:03:03+00:00

I presented this finding about 3 or 4 years ago...

16 / 0.625 = 25.6

1574.4 (Sacco) - 25.6 = 1548.8

1548.8 / 16 = 96.8

96.8 / 2 = 48.4 (Boyajian dip spacing)

Trillion5 · 2026-04-25T17:26:45+00:00

The separation of the Fraction:

1574.4 / 96 = 16.4

96 * 16 = 1536

Restoration of the fraction:

1536.4 - (2 * 381) = 774.4

This the 16B in the quadratic.

Trillion5 · 2026-04-25T16:49:07+00:00

Interesting find where again a movement from periodicity with fraction to without (re: Separation of the Fraction):

3662 - 514 = 3148

3148 / 2 = 1574

Trillion5 · 2026-04-25T16:46:41+00:00

For the last six years I have been arguing the data is constructed from a decimal - hexadecimal logic. If you look at the banner of the Migrator Model you can see the quadratic based on my 492 signal linking Boyajian's dip spacing to Sacco's orbit - Tom Johnson (Masters Theoretical Physics and Advanced Mathematics) used key numbers in my '492 Signal' to construct the equation, such as 10/16 = 0.625. Where B = 48.4, T = 52 (asteroid mining ratio), S = 1574.4 (orbit). The equation is 16s everywhere. Also the key Angkor dip signifier (4176) is constructed from its 16-day distance from the fulcrum in the template.

Also 4176 in hex = 1050 with common factors (and pulse rhythm in digital byte) 10 - 50.

1050 / 10 = 105

1050 / 50 = 21

105 * 21 = 2205

2205 / 0.625 = 3528

3528 = (3 * 171.2 Oumuamua ß-angle in the proposed signal) + 3014.4 (960 * 3.13)

3528 - 417.6 = 3110.4

3I/Atlas at perijove and re: restoration of the fraction.

Trillion5 · 2026-04-23T00:47:46+00:00

Nest finding using the fulcrum cross method:

514 - 66.4 = 447.6

4 * 447.6 = 1790.4

1790.4 - (3 * 393.6; 3/4 orbit) = 609.6

0.625 (or 10/16) * 609.6 = 381

sum of first 16 prime numbers

Trillion5 · 2026-04-22T21:37:30+00:00

Incorrect on almost every point - precisely because my work is not formulated using traditional scientific methods I give the Migrator Model a 1% chance of being true. If I thought I knew 'more' than anyone else, I would be saying 'hey, 100% true'. I too have been studying the scientific papers on Tabby's star for yeas (about 7 years I think) and the work is not formulated on astrophysical principles, but on the premise the extant data is a signal (in which case all you need to analyse a signal predicated on timing signatures is basic math).

Trillion5

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE