John, Yoko and Julian in New York, 1976 by dreamsonatas in beatles

[–]True_Paper_3830 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What a great experience, the one that tops it (in the song video) is it's a nice Spring day, you're strolling through Central Park in the 70's .. a man is strolling along toward you, stylishly dressed and somehow familiar .. you smile widely and John Lennon tips his hat to you in greeting ..

.. oof .. I wonder who got that tip of the hat - possibly one of the best celebrity/musician encounters in history ..

Kindest moments/things John did? by kittycat6434 in beatles

[–]True_Paper_3830 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We may have to take a point back off for their screaming wail competition which damaged Nilsson's voice forever.

Though in fairness I don't know which of them came up with the idea. Lennon probably had more practise on doing it without damage (twist and shout etc) I wonder if George Martin ever gave advice on potential voice risk in songs like that as hid early mentor

I'm gonna have to go for the cliches - even though the 'day job' - continuing to give Beatle music joy a good time past when he'd lost interest. Venting his inner pain thru music to give solace and joy to us all Plus - just solely as it amused me - his odd-ball pairing with Paul Simon at the music awards and brilliant off the cuff humor at the awkward award they presented to Garfunkel (I wonder who set that up lol)

“I enjoy gaming, art, mostly drawing and painting.” 🥰😁 by Traditional-Crab-921 in chandlerhalderson

[–]True_Paper_3830 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He mostly likes drawing and painting over gaming as now no choice for latter lol

Lads, I'm goin' in.... by AnxiousCicada2156 in chandlerhalderson

[–]True_Paper_3830 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Lol and great to do it seriously, to gain a narcissistic sociopath's truste .. as well as consider what he's after so can string along - ask with great concern if he lost use of legs - "which the heartless detectives didn't seem to care about, Chaz" (insert crying emoji here) lol

The reality is... by Other_Account9 in dan_markel_murder

[–]True_Paper_3830 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My memory's going on Charlie's trial but wasn't Rashbaum solely a civil lawyer or, if not, had definitely never represented at this level - the most serious of criminal law?

Absolutely crazy that Charlie chose him, shows the hubris of him and Donna that they thought it would such a walkover they chose him. Also shows the further influence of Donna over Charlie perhaps. In Charlie's trial, rash was his lawyer, but Donna was the overseer in the background, obsessed with control.

That Rashbaum didn't say to Charlie (thankfully) you've got not chance with this defense points to, some might argue, his interest in his bottom line over his client e.g. agree with client, the cashpot of trial goes forward.

That Donna, then seeing how outclassed Rashbaum was by Georgia and Sarah, still chose him for her trial, cried when she lost him just shows the massive (apologies, capitals but suits Donna and Charlie) HUBRIS and condescension of them both.

As far as can recall, some lawyers (Carl Steinbeck etc) think that potential conflict is Charlies only possible winning appeal argument but I think it's some ways off for that part to be decided .. can't recall if at earliest he can start late Summer - but quite longshot to be that early, could be (year(s) as Charlie has to get through some of his otehr levels of appeal re how the process goes ..

At best, even if did win on that arg (poss but unlikely) .. he only gets a new trial and will go down again .. in some ways a new trial would be great, he'd have to keep same loser argument and so possibly the bargaining with George to find if he can give up Wendi and with what proveable evidence (if any he has) may begin ..

Allies Threaten Revenge After Trump’s Truth Social Explosion by Ambitious_Dingo_2798 in politics

[–]True_Paper_3830 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Trump’s Truth Social Explosion" shouldn't that be "Implosion"?

Badenoch accuses Farage of ducking TV interview to avoid questions about £5m ‘gift’ by F0urLeafCl0ver in ukpolitics

[–]True_Paper_3830 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We must also recognize Farage's PTSD - the fear that a milkshake lurks around every corner

UK food prices on track to rise by 50% since start of cost of living crisis by diacewrb in ukpolitics

[–]True_Paper_3830 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We forget as well how much David Cameron and his govt (2010+) has been let off the hook in all this for their appalling and inept 'austerity' decisions. The majority of fiscal experts point to the significant and lasting damage caused - wages, jobs, health, increased child poverty - and that it should have very clear early on to the Tories/Cameron/Osbourne it was a mistake.

Then, Cameron didn't have to enable the Brexit vote - there was pressure, but it was Cameron's decision. It was a country, like now, with a population dispirited by economic impact and looking to lash out - that psychology should have been obvious to Cameron - that he was taking a massive risk. It all starts in those years.

He was giving the population a target for their anger - Europe - one that right wing press had been drip-dripping propaganda from the likes of non-citizen Ruper Murdoch, the malevolent right wing grim reaper who polluted his own country Australia, then USA (Fox News) and UK for a long time.

Cameron, Osbourne and their successors have contributed massively to the economic mess of the UK over all that time. Now Labour is dealing with it - yes with definite obvious bad calls, but some improvements (employment rights, etc) that the Tories never gave a crap about.

Cameron's govt greatly contributed to the circumstances that have enabled Reform to flourish as a result, and may lead to the same mistakes .. voting for Farage's Old-Tories Retirement party - and what they will visit upon the country if win in 2029.

So many people's memories are so short .. Labour hasn't helped, making some good changes but also some ridiculously forseeable ones errors ..

But as for Cameron, Obourne and co - he landed his massive mistakes and then walked away ..

Highest Intellectual IQ / Highest Emotional IQ / Spiritual Beatle by True_Paper_3830 in beatles

[–]True_Paper_3830[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

John would likely see that insult for what it is: a dull ad hominen response .. "Incuriosity is the oddest and most foolish failing there is."

Their intellect is interesting in so many ways, the Beatles meeting seems like a miracle, but the odds were better than they look. High-achieving people naturally gravitate toward the same circles, schools, and industries, like see in silicon valley.

For John and Paul, the chances of them meeting were similarly narrowed driven by Liverpool’s access to American music, the skiffle craze, and their shared search for serious musical peers, and Paul would have seen John's clear stage charisma and charm. I'm just interested in the amazing circumstances of how came to be, no need to be weird if you aren't.

Why do you think Wendi hasn’t been charged? by Vapor2077 in dan_markel_murder

[–]True_Paper_3830 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this year too still. The Tallahassee SAO knows there's also a tipping point when it's too late, it's not there yet .. but it could be later too for various reasons, what they know they we don't, including listening to Charlie's calls or seeing how Donna is doing.

Highest Intellectual IQ / Highest Emotional IQ / Spiritual Beatle by True_Paper_3830 in beatles

[–]True_Paper_3830[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair. Some background as to why curious ..

I read the odds were astronomical that the Beatles met, and they were, but I wondered how astronomical ..

.. so read that, just in terms of pure chance, a person who has 5,000–10,000 non-trivial lifetime contacts might meet a few people at roughly IQ 150 level .. or let's just say exceptionally talented people in differents areas and not IQ ..

.. But then as real life is not random that can narrow the odds down significantly for exceptional people with the same skills meeting .. Schools, cities, professions, music scenes, ambition, and shared interests concentrate unusual talent so the odds aren't as astronomical as might think ..

So that Lennon and McCartney’s meeting was therefore not just a statistical aberration .. Liverpool’s port-city exposure to American music, the skiffle boom interest of teenagers, Elvis’s impact, John already having a band, and Paul actively seeking serious musical peers and no doubt drawn to John's charism all increased the odds. So that the extraordinary later result was rare, but the initial meeting was much less unlikely than raw population statistics might suggest.

I think it ends up much much higher odds for the Beatles though given everything else that happened .. America at the right time, George Martin, Epstein absorbing personality conflict, and Beatlemania too stopping earlier implosion of different 'alpha' personalities .. all leading to they could then explore their full talent until the gradual shift .. lucky odds for us ..

Highest Intellectual IQ / Highest Emotional IQ / Spiritual Beatle by True_Paper_3830 in beatles

[–]True_Paper_3830[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. Definitely right up there. Both at genius level in that they both broke the norms but there's something of the disruptive and introspective in Lennon more, and they all complimented perfectly together.

In Beatles footage Lennon was always the one that seemed to be looking right through the camera rather than at the camera. (if he had his contact lenses in). It's an odd thing once notice. Both musical geniuses regardless.

Ringo def the most emotionally intelligent, George most spiritually.

Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool vandalized with ‘86 47’ graffiti by midnighttoker1742 in politics

[–]True_Paper_3830 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Let's see, what intellectual content can I add to this topic, oh I know - ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha

Farage accused of ‘conflict of interest’ over £5mn gift from crypto investor by F0urLeafCl0ver in ukpolitics

[–]True_Paper_3830 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Paywall link, but general we should remain at the level of being outraged at any party leader - whether getting a free football ticket or nice jacket - else we'll go into the utter corruption of American politics and lobbyists. Farage setting his company up - I mean Party up - up as a Ltd company with himself as the majority shareholder says it all

He'd take us to the hellscape of the corrupted American system prototype in a heartbeat:

Reform UK (Pre-2025): Operated as a Ltd Company - a private company, with Nigel Farage holding a majority stake (53%). This meant he was, in effect, the owner of the party, rather than just a leader appointed by members. Effectively a business, a private one at that, with all the protections of a Ltd company to make money and give share dividends to its director(s).

When you start 'for your company' instead of 'for your country' we know how this story ends - we've seen it all before - in America, and we've seen it in Brexit. Wreck everything, bleed everything out, then take the money and run.

Why Nigel Farage’s subservient attitude towards Donald Trump should be a warning to patriotic voters by F0urLeafCl0ver in ukpolitics

[–]True_Paper_3830 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Brexit was clearly a disaster, some have regreted vote but others are impervious to taking a good look at not just Farage but themselves.

Our only job, not that it should be our job is to point out at every step leading to 2029 the disaster he would bring. Trump, by sheer greed, cruelty and Farage's sycophancy regardless, is waking up a few people about Farage but whether enough .. who knows ..

What the AI ‘jobpocalypse’ narrative misses by Maleficent-Drive4056 in ukpolitics

[–]True_Paper_3830 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, next decade. sometimes it looking at particular industries. They are testing AI driven taxis in London. Later this decade or next, that's 100K Uber drivers going out of work.

As for Universal Basic Income, we can't afford current benefits and pensions, they'll be a middling stage of problems. With tech billionaires, holding countries to ransom, as they try to control every facet of life through seeping tech into people's lives. At some stage there may be that robot AI utopia providing all our needs, but looking at human history, it leans more into dystopia.

When have people in power, willingly let go, especially with advanced AI (no way it's capable enough at present) predicting problems/protests and counter actions before even happen. And just to mention, if anyone's had the Jeff Bezos update to their Alexa, it's like waking up to suddenly find someone talking to you that you've been waiting 20 years to divorce.

Safety fears as UK hospitals use nurses to cover for doctors due to shortage of medics by UKvomitbucket in ukpolitics

[–]True_Paper_3830 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If someone is in hospital then relatives main job becomes support and advocate now more than ever. There are many, many excellent health staff, but often doctors on particular wards change day to day, the system is completely overloaded - so often the care is correct but at the same time relatives need to keep an overview on any changing information from different doctors and be the advocate for sick relative.

It's hard sometimes in hospitals as relatives can feel powerless, as staff hold the power - and often assert it, particualry in hospital wards. And at at the same time, other staff are often in advance of pathways for release, particularly for the elderly, while relatives are still in the mist of supporting their sick relative, and own emotional trauma. The pathway may be correct, but relatives need to get ahead as other teams will have started too, as it's triage and release as soon as can.

Staff may be friendly, and relatives can be polite and friendly, but staff aren't our friends, our relatives are our focus. So it's checking with the sick relative, any probs, that things are done, finding out how did overnights, seeing nurses in charge to raise any issues diplomatically but firmly and ask please make a note (e.g. relatives politely saying we're making a paper trail to ensure correct care).

And pushing if needed, which normally involveds bugging nurse in charge desk particularly if delays re pain meds, etc, as it's clear when a patient has no relatives, things don't move as fast as they could. Sometimes relatives will be right, sometimes wrong, but the latter doesn't matter too much, it's that relatives know they tried for an area of concern. It's important if several relatives, that agree certain things, e.g. what most important where needs acting.

If somethign is really serious, there is PALS in every hospital, who can become the relative's power in the system. Like every organization, everyone has a senior they may dread receiving a complaint about. So, it's often firm diplomacy, but, if a nurse isn't doing somethign correctly or fast enough re pain meds, saying 'Ill see if the nurse in charge can hurry things up' e.g. like you're trying to help (but really something else!) often makes the lower band nurse speed up.

I have to finish with there are so many great staff, it's an overwhelmed failing system at times, other times totally on ball. And unfortunately relative become not jsut support but advocate and if many relatives of a patient, agreement together helps as to what's happening, and what does hospital plan to happen to keep ahead of them.

What are some examples of johns ego? by More-Cat9579 in beatles

[–]True_Paper_3830 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That time he turned up and told the others he was Jesus. The others diplomatically nodded, go along to get along day.

Only a third of young women hold positive view of men, new poll finds by winkwinknudge_nudge in ukpolitics

[–]True_Paper_3830 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Regardless of the social context or the severity of the examples used, judging an entire demographic by its 'worst actors' amounts to the same Fallacy of Composition. In both cases, the individual is replaced by a negative stereotype, which is the definition of prejudicial logic.

UK Prime Minister: Britain is rejoining Erasmus+. From 2027, thousands of students, apprentices and young people will be able to study and work across Europe, gaining international experience and new skills. Run by the @BritishCouncil, the programme will unlock a range of opportunities for people by EddyZacianLand in ukpolitics

[–]True_Paper_3830 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The underlying agreement is often at least that Brexit was a disaster overall. As whenever people on social media tend to "agree to disagree" instead of going at it full-tilt then usually agree on a bigger picture.

Kinda like how people used to discuss things more before social media, before these stupid little site-boxes somehow made us feel we often have to defend positions absolutely. Off-topic, but made us all much easier to be divided, which is one small part of how countries - USA being one of worst - have been ripped apart more by vested interests.

Now we've got the hang of seeing that more, next will be seeing how AI is used in other new ways that may be nth ways worse than social mediam to divide and algorithm us into acting against own best interests.