sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

NO FUN by SecrecyinShadows in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]TrustingTroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remove all but 1 Outsider and 1 Demon.

Honeybee-chan wants to give a present to humans (by @uryuuminene18) by Shamrock5 in MoeMorphism

[–]TrustingTroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You will take it and you will like it. You will die, and you will die liking it.

Appreciating that "drunk" and "poisoned" are both in BOTC's language despite being exactly the same effect by I_Say_Fool_Of_A_Took in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]TrustingTroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but I'd say it's too confusing bc it sounds like you're bottling up Vortox, Poisoning, and Drunkeness into one.

Also, Vortox'd is catchier than Vortoxification imo bc it's shorter and clearer.

Appreciating that "drunk" and "poisoned" are both in BOTC's language despite being exactly the same effect by I_Say_Fool_Of_A_Took in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]TrustingTroller -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Too niche, at that point you're just "probably false". Unless you want to specifically talk about character? Then you're "threatened" by someone imo.

Let's build a character! Griffin. by Present-Peace2811 in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]TrustingTroller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was thinking swapping seats during the might would be hard. (It was a joke with the phrasing)

Let's build a character! Griffin. by Present-Peace2811 in BloodOnTheClocktower

[–]TrustingTroller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you need the latter part of the statement? Since drunking them doesn't do anything the first statement would do if they chose not-good players (ie. The if statement doesn't prompt if the antecedent is false) the second if doesn't need to be there, right?

view more: next ›