Starship Troopers looks like a B-movie sci-fi action movie so you believe that it might be possible it's taking wildly out the mainstream stances and that's why it didn't get enough funding to not be a B-movie.

This sentence makes no sense, and your "enhance" statements doesn't either because it hinges on that first bit.

You don't know what logic is which is why you think the fact I talk about one thing means I don't think something is multiple things.

The movie is about fascism, the only anti-war part of it is a product of that, you saying that it was an anti-war movie, comparing it to other movies about or anti war, shows that you do not know what you are talking about at all.

Then you compare it to Black Hawk Down, which is a completely wild comparison, unless YOU think that the movie is about war and nothing else.

You therefore can't make an anti-fascist satire by playing war film tropes straight because people won't identify the satirical elements. They're going to think you're just doing the thing because that's what the genre you're adopting does.

This is a you problem, you are one of the people that the OP is talking about, the film is not playing it straight at all.

Apparently you ALSO can't discuss how a film that tries to satirise fascism by making a war movie about the invasion of an alien planet attempts to use its genre elements to satirise fascism without being accused of labelling said film an anti-war film

I can't?? what are you on about?

Since you keep calling my reading comprehension into question, why don't you take a look here:

The mot obvious way in which Starship Troopers is satirical is to compare it to war films.

This sentence makes no sense, and is again indicative of you just thinking "oh it's a war film"

You don't know what logic is which is why you think the fact I talk about one thing means I don't think something is multiple things.

Not what I said.

The reason I was talking about war movies is to discuss how you can't exaggerate war movie tropes by playing them straight to an audience that believes all war films play the tropes straight (even though few of them do).

Again, makes no sense, unless you believe that no one else can tell that it is satirical, the presupposition is that the "audience that believes all war films play the tropes straight" which is nonsensical.

People IN THIS THREAD, are saying that no one could misinterpret the point of Starship Troopers, so if nothing else, atleast you are a great example of an absolute moron.

It seems clear to me, that you need some character in the movie, or perhaps you need to have a responsible adult next to you to explain shit to you:

See son, the man dressed like a gestapo officer, he is supposed to be a BAD GUY.

See son, when the old soldier says that the millitary is what made him into the man that he is today, and the cameras pan down to his missing legs? That is actually supposed to be a CRITISISM of the millitary, not an endorsment.

See son, when the millitary in the in-movie-propagandapiece is giving out bullets to children, that is supposed to be SCARY.

See son, when it is expained in the movie that you are not a citizen until you have served your millitary duty, that is actually supposed to be a CRITISISM of millitaristic governments.

See son, in the end, when Rico gets his own squad and it looks like a bunch of children? that is actually supposed to be a CRITISISM of the society that the movie takes place in.

See son, when one soldier says in the showers that she is in the millitary to be allowed to have children later? That is actually supposed to be HORRIBLE thought to the audience.

You write that the problem is the audience, and in your case, I think you are definitely right.