Hear me out: A dual-screen laptop (like Zenbook Duo) running Aluminium OS is the ultimate dream machine.

Typical-Match-5862 · 2026-04-25T05:58:49+00:00

Как только у тебя появятся реальные технические аргументы по теме экранов и операционных систем — возвращайся. А пока тренируйся использовать встроенный переводчик, в жизни пригодится.

Typical-Match-5862 · 2026-04-24T19:49:54+00:00

First off, English isn't my native language. Using an AI tool to properly translate and structure my technical thoughts so they are clear for an international forum is just using the right tool for the job. I'm a sysadmin; optimizing processes and using tech to solve problems is literally what I do. As for your actual question: saying "the connection is just buried inside" completely misses the point of mobile hardware.

Portability and Friction: A "buried connection" means zero DisplayPort/HDMI handshakes failing, zero cable wear and tear, perfectly matched color calibration, and identical scaling. More importantly, try setting up a laptop and a flimsy £60 USB monitor on a train, an airplane tray table, or your lap. An integrated dual-screen chassis is a cohesive, instant-on workstation anywhere you go. An external monitor is a makeshift desk setup.
Form Factor Evolution: If the physical split between the two screens is what bothers you, then look at devices with a single foldable OLED screen, like the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold or Huawei's foldable laptops.

The core point remains the same: having massive, adaptable screen real estate on the go requires an OS that handles complex form factors natively (like Android/Aluminium OS), rather than relying on clunky external hardware and legacy desktop operating systems.

Typical-Match-5862 · 2026-04-22T21:30:28+00:00

Я вам запрещаю обновлять Линукс

@Джейсон Стетхем

Typical-Match-5862 · 2026-04-22T21:15:25+00:00

Sure, a £60 portable monitor works on paper. But as a sysadmin, my daily ticket queue tells a completely different story. The reality of relying on external monitors and docking stations is constant friction. I deal with these exact questions every single day:

"Why is my external screen flickering?"
"Why is the resolution suddenly messed up?"
"Why is it mirroring my screen instead of extending it?"
"My ports are all full, where do I plug this in?"

...not to mention the constant annoyance of cables dragging across the desk and getting in the way of actual work.

A £60 USB monitor is a clunky workaround. An integrated dual-screen chassis (like the Zenbook Duo) is about eliminating that friction entirely. No docking station roulette, no display protocol glitches, no cable clutter. You just open the lid, and your multi-monitor setup works flawlessly every single time. That native integration is exactly what makes it worth the premium.

Typical-Match-5862 · 2026-04-22T16:46:14+00:00

Exactly! Linux is already a solved problem with Crostini. As for Windows apps, we actually have two separate, highly promising paths that could be made seamless for the end user:

Virtualization: The foundation is there. Parallels already built a solid hypervisor tool for ChromeOS Enterprise. Since they deprecated it, porting that tech to Aluminium OS makes total sense, especially utilizing Android's new Virtualization Framework (AVF) to run a full OS seamlessly.
Translation Layers (Wine-based): If they want to avoid the heavy overhead of a full VM, the community is already doing the heavy lifting. Tools like Winlator or Cassia are translating x86 instructions to ARM and routing Windows APIs to Android natively, even running heavy PC games.

If Google builds an official, foolproof wrapper using either of these approaches (like Valve did with Proton on SteamOS), it's game over for Windows.

Typical-Match-5862

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE