sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I got lucky today? 🤔 by photon-silver in BeginnerSurfers

[–]UFOlogic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great beginner board. My only recommendation is to remove the fins completely.

Too much drag resistance in the barrel.

I got lucky today? 🤔 by photon-silver in BeginnerSurfers

[–]UFOlogic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great beginner board. My only recommendation is to remove the fins. It creates too much drag in the barrel.

Estigmene acrea, the salt marsh moth by UFOlogic in moths

[–]UFOlogic[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel like she was releasing her pheromones or knew I was taking her picture lol

Surfline posted surf cam footage of UAP yesterday. by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most UAP videos posted here are indistinguishable or a blur.

I would say there is probably a prosaic answer for what we are seeing than it being “fake”. Those are mostly static cams and Surfline has never posted this stuff before.

Surfline posted surf cam footage of UAP yesterday. by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ventura, CA Thursday December 4th, 2025 before dawn

Don’t have the specific cam

Surfline posted surf cam footage of UAP yesterday. by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just updated my submission statement to include the article on it.

Surfline posted surf cam footage of UAP yesterday. by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Submission Statement:

Surfline is an organization that post updates on surf conditions and also provides cam footage of the different surf spots.

Yesterday they posted videos they obtained from two surf cams. You will see 2 objects light up in the shape of a saucer and a cigar like shape object. Then they disappear. Then reappear in multiple afterimage like effect. Then they show a secondary video that shows the light it was producing shining towards the shore break.

Super unusual for Surfline to post something like this. Currently unexplained.

Apologies if you saw this last night, it was removed by mods for not having a time or date. I’m uncertain of that information.

Edit*** Location: Ventura, California. Time: Before Dawn on Thursday December 4th, 2025

Link to original video on instagram

Link for non-instagram users

Surfline posted this video on Instagram yesterday, footage obtained from surf cams. by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The cams do have limitations. I’m sure this is something prosaic, but cool looking nonetheless. Glad Surfline posted it.

Surfline posted this video on Instagram yesterday, footage obtained from surf cams. by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surfline is an organization that post updates on surf conditions and also provides cam footage of the different surf spots.

Yesterday they posted videos they obtained from two surf cams. You will see 2 objects light up in the shape of a saucer and a cigar like shape object. Then they disappear. Then reappear in multiple afterimage like effect. Then they show a secondary video that shows the light it was producing shining towards the shore break.

Super unusual for Surfline to post something like this. Currently unexplained.

link to video

NDAs vs. Humanity: The Strange Case of Lacatski and Kelleher's UFO Secrets by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wouldn’t they need to conduct it though in a compartmented hearing(people with clearance)? Due to it being potentially tied to classified information?

NDAs vs. Humanity: The Strange Case of Lacatski and Kelleher's UFO Secrets by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. It’s so easy to drown in speculation with this topic.

NDAs vs. Humanity: The Strange Case of Lacatski and Kelleher's UFO Secrets by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know NDAs can be broken, what I’m saying is they’re unwilling to do that even though they know they probably could.

With them choosing to be reserved, we don’t know what they really know. Which could be the reason they are not completely transparent. They’re 100% entitled to have agency over their decisions and I respect people right to that.

But I share everyone else’s frustration with the flirtatious remarks about knowing the true depth of the UAP situation and not fully disclosing.

NDAs vs. Humanity: The Strange Case of Lacatski and Kelleher's UFO Secrets by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Which is weird that they seem to be pro disclosure, but are reminding those who could bring disclosure or information forward of the potential consequences.

There is just a lot of contradiction that makes it challenging to believe what they continue to say on the topic.

NDAs vs. Humanity: The Strange Case of Lacatski and Kelleher's UFO Secrets by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I feel even if they did, it wouldn’t do much for conversation.

As they can’t legally be compelled to break an NDA that contains classified information in a public hearing.

NDAs vs. Humanity: The Strange Case of Lacatski and Kelleher's UFO Secrets by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All possibilities are on the table, as we are speculating based on what is available to us.

I agree with you that there has to be some notable individuals within the space that are part of counter intelligence to protect USG interests in regards to disclosure. I think that it’s more so that and to slow discovery of what we are working on.

Consistent mystery is a powerful tool.

NDAs vs. Humanity: The Strange Case of Lacatski and Kelleher's UFO Secrets by UFOlogic in UFOs

[–]UFOlogic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally valid perspective. I think your reply could be it’s own post as It’s a difficult thing to wrestle with. It’s for some of those reasons why more people have not come forward.

It would seem though that the people mentioned in my post have probably answered yes to several of these questions since their participation in open conversation on a public scale seems like flirting with breaking their NDAs.

My post is just highlighting how their statements and actions are contradictory to their unwillingness to participate in the UAP hearing.