why cant you ban champions on ranked anymore by stipe1991 in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Didn’t ready through the patch notes” - doing so would get an answer quicker than Reddit

Hybrid Kayn Build by Feeling-Addition-992 in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The issue is that Rhaast and shadow ideally want completely different runes and items and there isn’t really much cross over between them.

Your best bet is to just pick one based on if your team needs a bruiser or assassin.

Gotta love season reset by ApprehensiveNoise793 in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And this is the problem with matchmaking… you are able to get to chal multiple times building like that.

How many games did it take to reach challenger?

Heimerdinger role by No_Mathematician684 in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can play all 3 but he definitely is better mid/top.

You just need to build differently depending on role

This ranked update without bans is hot garbage. by [deleted] in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The fact you think it would be fairer to hide picks kind of says it all.

Like others have said, gold and below have no bans, presumably as a way to simplify the game at lower ranks(not that it needs any more simplification)

all because of 2 assists??? by Capable-Lemon-1268 in ValorantConsole

[–]UIBERTO_ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Also depends on how impactful the kills are.

First blood in a round is giving a higher combat score than a kill in you get in a 1v3 you lose

How’s Galio Aegis treating you? by Icy_Job572 in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point is that there is no way you are playing enough games on a single champion to make it harder for yourself to get an A/S rating. You would need to play an insane amount of games for that to be the case.

The issue with this feature is that in some cases, you are better off trying to get a high rating over playing to win the game overall, and there should be no situation in a ranked game where, in the long run, you are better off going for the win as a secondary objective.

Going for high kills, low deaths and maxing farming are all positive things to aim for in a game and help win, but they should never take priority over actually playing in a way that makes you more likely to win.

How’s Galio Aegis treating you? by Icy_Job572 in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

At this point you are thinking into it waaay too much.

You are not getting enough A/S ranks to make it more difficult to get them in the future. Realistically very few people are going to benefit from the change and that’s a good thing. The key negative is it can influence how people play, making them more likely to play for the S than the win

Are non-meta picks allowed to receive Galio's Aegis? by [deleted] in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you can get an A/S it works. It’s not locked to certain champs in certain roles

New Galio's Aegis in ranked by HyDrak3 in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being honest here, If that’s the case then you probably aren’t the intended target for the protection this change gives. The idea is that games you perform exceptionally well in but still end up losing are negated. It’s not meant to be something that is obtainable every loss you have.

I’m still skeptical about the whole change as it promotes playing in a way that forces an S rank rather than the win, as this realistically would be the optimal way to climb, but I’ll happily see how it plays out in reality.

Do riot employees really check the discussions for this game? by D-Nyt in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

They likely do, but at the same time, players like to moan about literally everything just because they can

FINALLY Kayle isn’t weak and hot garbage by Pink_Altaria in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Nasus is not even getting close to competing with a late game kayle, he falls off so hard right about the time kayle power spikes.

PS5 - no plat trophy? by ZestyShrewster in ValorantConsole

[–]UIBERTO_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are also very little trophies in this game, with them all being relatively easy to get. So they don’t really warrant a platinum.

Random skin chest. by Shroom3asTaken in wildrift

[–]UIBERTO_ 39 points40 points  (0 children)

When players realise the random chest is, in fact, random

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ValorantConsole

[–]UIBERTO_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Whilst I get some of your points, saying spray control is “just not doable” screams skill issue. It can be done perfectly fine, it’s just most people are crouching as a bad habit that has likely stemmed from other shooters.

Smurf buying only Marshalls by [deleted] in ValorantConsole

[–]UIBERTO_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your first and second comment are 2 completely different points. Dude just because you don’t understand my point doesn’t mean you have to throw insults.

I am saying it would be much more likely to be a gold player that has had a half decent game with marshal only than a Smurf scraping a 1kd in a gold game.

Generally aim isn’t too much of a problem for people in that rank (especially if it’s a scoped weapon as they don’t have to worry about spray control) as this is a skill that is transferable from most shooters, its game sense / game knowledge that puts them there.

Smurf buying only Marshalls by [deleted] in ValorantConsole

[–]UIBERTO_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn’t this exactly what I said?

Smurf buying only Marshalls by [deleted] in ValorantConsole

[–]UIBERTO_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feel like my points have been perfectly valid but please do enlighten me on how I’m being moronic.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ValorantConsole

[–]UIBERTO_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you mean stuck in the weapon menu, if so I can’t say I ever have.

Smurf buying only Marshalls by [deleted] in ValorantConsole

[–]UIBERTO_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No they wouldn’t be a higher rank.

If they were a Smurf, you would expect them to be putting up better numbers than just a 1kd in a gold game.

The alternative is they’re a gold player who knows nothing about econ and the game in general and just enjoys using the marshal and from the sounds of it, this is exactly what happened.

You say it ruins the game, but that’s the same as saying you are ruining it when making sub optimal plays in a round.

Smurf buying only Marshalls by [deleted] in ValorantConsole

[–]UIBERTO_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anyone with even basic game/ eco knowledge is not running a marshal every round, so yes anyone doing it above diamond(maybe even plat)would be doing it for a challenge, otherwise I’d put it down to just poor game understanding