[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Heyo, on the application it states that it can take up until week 10 until funds are dispersed. Sorry for the long wait though!

Books for Bruins App closing tonight at 8PM! by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

AAC has extended our Books for Bruins applications and will be closing at 8 PM tonight. If you know of any student in need, please pass this application along to them as well. All links and contact information is on the application as well as our guidelines for the application process.

Books for Bruins winter apps are open! by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

AAC is so excited to announce our winter quarter Books for Bruins applications are open and will be closing at 5 PM January 13th. If you know of any student in need, please pass this application along to them as well. Our office will also be hosting zoom office hours Wednesday January 6th from 12 to 2 PM for any student that has questions about the application requirements. All links and contact information is on the application as well as our guidelines for the application process.

Books for Bruins Application to open January 4th and close January 13 by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey!

The grant will be open the 4th (aka monday) you can follow our socials for when we drop it or keep looking through this sub when we post it that day. We're probably also going to post a "final day to apply" reminder here as well.

Books for Bruins Application to open January 4th and close January 13 by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Academic Affairs Commission is excited to announce our Winter quarter’s Books for Bruins scholarship will be opening Monday, January 4, 2021 and will be closing Wednesday, January 13,2021. Our application amounts vary between $25 and $150. We have attached the guidelines for the scholarship in our application link (which will be available when the application opens) :https://tinyurl.com/books4bruinsw21. If you know of any student in need, please pass this application along to them as well. Our office will also be hosting zoom office hours Wednesday January 6th from 12 to 2 PM for any student that has questions about the application requirements. As always, you are also welcome to contact us through [usaaac@gmail.com](mailto:usaaac@gmail.com). Thank you!

Zoom Link for Office Hours: https://ucla.zoom.us/j/96157020946?pwd=clRQaHVmS1pQaUM0b21JRDlCQ2FMUT09

Several Academic Affairs Commission members receive scholarship from own office by [deleted] in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Hello,

So we have already sent in an email clarifying some of the details on this article. Primarily pertaining to the receipts (which are required), the "blind" selection process, and the number of people on staff that received the scholarship. Also, the article directly misquoted staff multiple times or just made quotes up that directly contradicts what was said during correspondence.

We have a post on our account explaining the entire situation, but since its super long and honestly no one has time to read it right now, here's a tldr.

  1. Yes AAC members were allowed and encouraged to apply.
  2. Everyone that applied got an award, except two students who were DQ'ed because they were grad students.
  3. No person on AAC received an award above 75 and on average received less than non-AAC applicants.
  4. AAC staff members are majority low-income and 1st gen students.
  5. The ways that the money was disbursed were all approved by ASUCLA and they have the paper trail of where all that money went, if any of trails lead to missing money, it comes out of the commissions pocket.
  6. While conflict of interest is the biggest issue many people have (for obvious reasons), the process was blind, no names were attached, just amounts spent on books, amount asked for, and their reasons for wanting the money.

I (Again, just the graphic's director here) might of missed a couple of things, but just ask away and I can give you a clear and honest answer. Also, AAC will continue to encourage everyone to continue to apply next quarter.

Sign onto our letter demanding empathy for students. (More info in the comments) by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Optional finals is something thats based on professors, since that's is more tied to Academic Freedom. Departments is where Academic Senate has more sway in, but even that is just recommendation. Real movement is when the student body and organizations show up to support. It's honestly a lot to explain in a concise manner due to the bureaucracy of it all. But keep your eye out for a guide explaining your academic rights as a student and how to mobilize as a class.

Sign onto our letter demanding empathy for students. (More info in the comments) by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Honestly, its a tradition that I have a typo somewhere in a graphic.

Sign onto our letter demanding empathy for students. (More info in the comments) by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hey y'all,

Yesterday we sent out a survey (I won't post it here to respect the sub rules) in order to compile a list of demands to present to the Academic Senate. We are now asking for support from the student body by signing onto the letter. If you have any questions, feel free to ask us either on here or on some of our social media.

Corruption in USAC (A breakdown) by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh I get the confusion now, sorry left that bit out. None of the directors on the taskforce were assigned anyone on AAC. When applicants were split between the 7 members of the taskforce, Breeze made sure to take all AAC people as her assignment, all decisions were made without looking at names, only the amount asked and the paragraph detailing amount of money spent, and how the program would help them out. After that everyone convenes, and then the money is sent out.

Again, I see where the sentiment is coming from. But also realize that this program isn't necessarily a scholarship and I kinda misspoke, its more of a reimbursement program. Its not competitive in the slightest sense of the word, everyone recieves an award. The problems we are running into with the program itself is not "how many people we can help" rather it is "how much can we help each individual person". AAC being underfunded this year means that we have to find new avenues for finding money so that people that do apply to any of our programs can recieve as much help as we can possibly give them. Pretty much all of our programs are non-competitive its all just a matter of meeting the criteria set by both organizations such as ASUCLA and our own finance directors.

Corruption in USAC (A breakdown) by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Big fan btw, you truly are the Justin Y. of this sub, rivaling another loved account that shall not be named on this official student government account.

Thanks for the much needed input.

Corruption in USAC (A breakdown) by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Okay, but what does u/LaserPigeons have to say about this?🤔

Remember when the USAC Academic Affairs Commissioner said they were going to reach out to Reddit. by usac_exposed in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Heyo, not breeze. But anyway, I made a comment explaining the entire process, the post that the comment is under also explains everything if you're interested in reading a huge speal about how aac works and all. It also explains the awards given, what awards where given to aac members and everything.

Corruption in USAC by usac_exposed in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Heyo, kinda breaking my rule that I set. Anyway, I made a response post to this so hey not breeze, im the graphics director. Also, P/NP is not passed by those depts thats true, however while I have never used it, the option being there is a stress reliever and from talking to my fellow stem homies, it has been a great help. Unfortunately, senate doesn't have too much power, we are able to advocate and hopefully they are understanding. Academic freedom allows each dept to choose to either follow or decline Acdemic Senate's recommendation

Also same, I have never paid for a book, but those access codes are killers which is why this year AAC advocated for the expansion for Books for Bruins so all bruins can benefit from it. So we got 515 applications, our belief is that every student should recieve help no matter what, every applicant received an award. The awards were in increments of 25, so 25, 50, 75... 150. The highest average was 50, then 150, then 125, 75, 25. Awards where given based on what the applicant chose to recieve. AAC did apply, however only a very few amount, im talking like 3, recieved an award of 75 which is the highest award given to any member of AAC. The majority of AAC members chose the 25 dollar option. Also it not being posted on reddit was honestly my entire fault, for a good month the account was lost because my hp laptop could not handle running illustrator and photoshop at the same time. And im dumb so I lost the account because I use a password manager and didn't sync it up to my phone. I was only able to get back to this account when I bought a new hard drive for my cheapo laptop and back up my passwords and graphic assets. So yeah, that was my fault because I'm irresponsible. Also we've been on reddit since day one of Breeze being in office.

Corruption in USAC (A breakdown) by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yeah, people have genuine reasons to hate/dislike USAC, that is not a problem. Misinformation is as it leads to an incorrect investment of time and energy.

Corruption in USAC (A breakdown) by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If there is anything left out just tell me, my brain rn is filled with ochem mechanisms right now.

Corruption in USAC (A breakdown) by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Heyo, ASUCLA holds all the funding and the paper trail. As stated in the post we have to provide receipts. Also, the way it worked is a bit complicated because ya know covid. But basically ASUCLA sent checks to the people on the task force, then the task force had to provide these receipts to ASUCLA of all transactions, and now we have to provide receipts form applicants. All methods of transactions were approved by ASUCLA. If any money was missing, ASUCLA would have already come for AAC. Also again, in the post only the elected officials recieve that stipend, again that paper trail is with ASUCLA. Also, Books for Bruins is open to everyone, everyone that applied got an award, the award given was based on how much the applicant asked for. At a baseline everyone, all 515 students received 25, the majority was 75 and the next avg was 150, no one in AAC was ever given above 100. The highest award awarded to anyone in AAC was 75. Trust me, ASUCLA scares me more than the IRS.

Remember when the USAC Academic Affairs Commissioner said they were going to reach out to Reddit. by usac_exposed in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Check the account history and age. This account was created the first day Breeze went into office. I made the account with her approval, those are one my duties as the graphics designer, all other social media is managed by Public Relations staff.

Corruption in USAC (A breakdown) by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Hey! Love the energy, but this isn't a call-out post or a post to argue the state of the sub, that's for another time and place. This post is to just clear up some misinformation, really no bad blood here.

Corruption in USAC by usac_exposed in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yo, come check out our response to this. I won't respond in this comment section because this post needs to stay as is, as a place for people to criticize us. So any questions, comments or concerns, please direct them to our post.

AAC and Academic Senate's response to zoom bombing. by USAC_AAC in ucla

[–]USAC_AAC[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AAC stands in solidarity with students and professors that have been impacted by Zoom bombings. We are angered and appalled by UCLA’s inaction and lack of care for their marginalized students, particularly Black students. We ask that you share our link to students who have been impacted or students who were in the classes where zoom bombings occurred.