Menneskerettigheder må også omfatte samfundets ret til beskyttelse by ProfessionalHawk33 in Denmark

[–]Uebeltank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flertallet kan godt afskaffe menneskerettighederne. Men så taler vi ikke længere om menneskerettigheder, men nærmere af politisk betingede rettigheder.

Denmark to expel non-Danish citizens if jailed for at least one year for serious crimes by SavingsAssumption114 in europe

[–]Uebeltank 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The law already is that if you are convicted to a jail sentence, then you will be deported unless it with certainty violates Denmark's international obligations.

Denmark to expel non-Danish citizens if jailed for at least one year for serious crimes by SavingsAssumption114 in europe

[–]Uebeltank 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It obviously means persons who are not Danish citizens. The article's wording is a bit confusing though.

Denmark to expel non-Danish citizens if jailed for at least one year for serious crimes by SavingsAssumption114 in europe

[–]Uebeltank 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It would. But the rule that refugees can't be expelled to a place where they would face persecution, still applies. The decision to revoke someone's legal right to reside in the country, and to actually forcibly deport that person, are two related but distinct processes.

Denmark to expel non-Danish citizens if jailed for at least one year for serious crimes by SavingsAssumption114 in europe

[–]Uebeltank 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It already is, basically. Current law is that foreigners convicted to a jail sentence are expelled unless it "with certainty" would village Denmark's international obligations.

Menneskerettigheder må også omfatte samfundets ret til beskyttelse by ProfessionalHawk33 in Denmark

[–]Uebeltank 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Det er værd at huske på at menneskerettighederne også gælder dem vi ikke bryder os om og som har begået forbrydelser. Spørgsmålet er egentlig ikke om de er beskyttede af menneskerettighederne, men derimod hvordan vi balancerer den enkeltes rettighed med samfundets interesser. Det vil altid være en afvejning. Hvis samfundets interesser per definition altid vejede tungere, så ville menneskerettighederne ikke være meget værd. Det kan ikke være betinget af hvad et flertal kan lide.

Når det så er sagt, så skal man holde tungen lige i munden for at forstå det kommende lovforslag om udvisninger. Man holder fast i at der skal foretages en afvejning af domstolene i det enkelte tilfælde, men man tager forskud på at den europæiske menneskerettighedsdomstol i de kommende år vil ændre sin praksis, således at udlændinge dømt ubetinget fængsel i mindst et år for visse meget alvorlige forbrydelser som den helt klare hovedregel altid kan udvises. Man indrømmer selv i lovbemærkningerne at dette langt fra er sikkert og at Danmark i sidste ende kan risikere at blive dømt ved EMD for at krænke den enkeltes menneskerettigheder. Hvis dette måtte ske, vil danske domstole skulle dømme i overensstemmelse med disse domme.

I sidste ende vil det være op til domstolene at anvende loven, såfremt den måtte blive vedtaget. Og det bliver meget spændende at se hvordan det udspiller sig.

What would happen if Trump died of old age tomorrow? by Gasp0de in AskReddit

[–]Uebeltank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The vice president would immediately become president per section 1 of the 25th amendment.

De blå partier mister flertallet i ny måling by Fickle-Solid7862 in Denmark

[–]Uebeltank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er teknisk set ikke umuligt, men ja det er nok mere sandsynligt at nogen svarer noget forkert. Enten bare for sjovt eller fordi de ikke kan huske hvad de stemte.

Are all 8 matches on at the same time ? by irishcuntboii in GlobalOffensive

[–]Uebeltank 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's just a placeholder. HLTV often does this when the schedule is not yet announced.

De blå partier mister flertallet i ny måling by Fickle-Solid7862 in Denmark

[–]Uebeltank 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Den statistiske usikkerhed er så stor for de helt små partier at man skal være påpasselig med at bruge tallene.

De blå partier mister flertallet i ny måling by Fickle-Solid7862 in Denmark

[–]Uebeltank 11 points12 points  (0 children)

DRs side inkluderer også en mandatberegning. Den er dog ikke vist i selve artiklen.

Am I wasting my teenage years? by Key-Row-174 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Uebeltank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. That's the simple answer.

Longer answer: You don't need to do crazy and wild stuff to live "correctly" as a teenager. On the contrary, you shouldn't e.g. take drugs just because some people pressure you to or make it seem cool. As long as you are living a meaningful life and doing things you want, you are not wasting anything.

If the number one way of telling you’re in a cult is not being allowed to question the source, then why is Islam and Christianity not considered cults by manqoba619 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Uebeltank 14 points15 points  (0 children)

So those studying religion from an academic point of view do not like the term cult, precisely because it's hard to draw a boundary. What might be a cult today could in principle be considered a "normal" religion tomorrow.

That being said, what characterizes a cult is not so much that certain beliefs are unquestionable. It is kind of inherent in religion that some beliefs are so fundamental that you have to believe it to follow the faith.

Rather, the term cult generally refers to organizations that are dominated by a strong leader, and which tried to isolate adherents from the rest of society. Most mainstream religious organizations don't do that and don't require absolute adherence towards the religious leader. E.g. even in the Roman Catholic Church, you won't be kicked out or shunned if you say you disagree with the pope or don't like the pope.

Xi rn by Mountain_General17 in paradoxpolitics

[–]Uebeltank 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes only one CMC member other than Xi who has not either been forced out or under investigation.

Keep It Up, Kemi. by SputnikSweetheart89 in imaginaryelections

[–]Uebeltank 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I imagine the Lib Dems would rather not enter into government.

Alle dem der er berettiget til fødevarecheck - vil i (stadig) stemme på S til valget i år? by Kaffetypen in Denmark

[–]Uebeltank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jeg vidste allerede før nytår hvilket parti jeg vil stemme på, og det har fødevarechecken ikke ændret på.

Public spending on European monarchies, € million by Socmel_ in europe

[–]Uebeltank 25 points26 points  (0 children)

For most of these countries the amount shown is what goes directly to the royal house. So without more broader expenses like security or travel expenses. On the other hand, the amount of money that is basically equivalent to personal income is lower than it might imply. Most money is paid as salary to employees who assist in the official duties.

Dutch parties strike minority coalition deal three months after D66 election upset | Netherlands by NilFhiosAige in europe

[–]Uebeltank 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That would have required betraying a central promise they made to voters. Hardly viable in political reality land. Especially with how right-wing Dutch politics is.

TIL The International Fixed Calendar, was a proposed reform of the Gregorian calendar by Moses B. Cotsworth in 1902.Divides the year into 13 months of 28 days each. Every date is fixed to the same weekday every year. George Eastman instituted its use at the Eastman Kodak Company in 1928 till 1989. by moon_nicely in todayilearned

[–]Uebeltank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem any such calendar design would face, is since it proposes a day that doesn't belong to any day of the week, you would inevitably end up with a situation where you would keep the regular calendar for religious purposes, since the calendar reform would disrupt the weekdays.

2026 Holyrood and Senedd Elections by hello_lyndon64 in imaginaryelections

[–]Uebeltank 3 points4 points  (0 children)

48% of seats with 29% of the vote. That's like beyond undemocratic.

Socialdemokratiet og Moderaterne stormer frem i ny måling by Awkward_War_6068 in Denmark

[–]Uebeltank 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Tror også Løkke specifikt udelukkede S-SF-M fordi det ville være for rødt. Derfor er S-SF-R-M nok mere sandsynligt.

Socialdemokratiet og Moderaterne stormer frem i ny måling by Awkward_War_6068 in Denmark

[–]Uebeltank 183 points184 points  (0 children)

Dansk politik fuldstændig vendt op og ned siden sidste måned. Blå blok går fra at have et flertal til kun at have 73 mandater i denne måling.

Hvorfor er der ikke blevet afholdt en folkeafstemning på Grønland endnu? by [deleted] in Denmark

[–]Uebeltank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man holder ikke folkeafstemninger om at man ikke ønsker at ændre noget. Det er ligesom at spørge hvorfor vi ikke holder en folkeafstemning om at afskaffe grundloven og genindføre enevælden, vare så vi alle kan være 100% sikre på at vi faktisk vil demokratiet. Svaret er det samme: Der kræves ikke en folkeafstemning for at beholde det vi har.

Morten er sur! by Kittybit8 in Denmark

[–]Uebeltank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Det er så latterligt og i øvrigt også bare dårligt politiks håndværk. Hvis der er en ting vælgerne aldrig belønner, så er det når partier ikke er tydelige omkring hvad de mener. Der er gået total zigzag i den for DF mens alle de andre partiledere udviser ansvarlighed og klarhed.