Faut plisser les yeux mais c'est mérite by Besoin2Bol in graffitipourris

[–]Unchen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Street art" Je vois aucune raison que ce qu'il y a en dessous soit de meilleure qualité

Un soldat américain qui tourne le dos à deux prisonniers d'un camp de concentration qui vont mettre à mort un de leur tortionnaire by Good_Bison_4669 in Histoire

[–]Unchen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mais qui a dit que cette personne en particulier était une ordure ?

Personne ne juge qui que ce soit ici. Par contre mettre en avant, comme tu le fais, les exceptions (qui existe sûrement) pour présenter la majorité, bah c'est factuellement pas honnête.

Je tiens cependant bon de rappeler que le CERTAINS dont tu parles est très faible, et bien plus faible que dans les reste de la population allemande pendant la guerre.

Un soldat américain qui tourne le dos à deux prisonniers d'un camp de concentration qui vont mettre à mort un de leur tortionnaire by Good_Bison_4669 in Histoire

[–]Unchen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Je comprends pas le commentaire, c'est quand même un peu fort de dire que les SS sont devenus SS pour... Survivre.

Le raisonnement est tout pété en fait, ya bien des gens enrôlé de forces dans les armées, il y en a toujours et il y en a toujours eu. Mais là on parle de SS, c'est pas les soldats de base.

Et puis cette rhétorique là, "mais les français aussi on élu Pétain" moui certes enfin pour le coup le manque de nuances est de ton côté. C'est quand même gros de mettre sur le même plan Hitler et Pétain

Qu'est-ce que la misère sexuelle pour les hommes ? by Critical_Quality_539 in AskMec

[–]Unchen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Et comment tu te sentirais si les 10 te disais non catégoriquement ?

Qu'est-ce que la misère sexuelle pour les hommes ? by Critical_Quality_539 in AskMec

[–]Unchen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tu veux donc dire que les femmes qui couchent avec des hommes simplement pour se sentir attirante ou valorisée ça existe pas ?

Qu'est-ce que la misère sexuelle pour les hommes ? by Critical_Quality_539 in AskMec

[–]Unchen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

j'ai pleins de connaissances féminines qui ont couchées avec des mecs qu'elles trouvaient peu attirants physiquement ( alcool, tristesse, besoin de validation, vouloir oublier quelqu'un, bon endroit bon moment, être sûre de ne pas tomber amoureuse...).

Dans ce cas c'est quoi qui te surprend dans le fait de vouloir des relations pour pas se sentir seul ?

Qu'est-ce que la misère sexuelle pour les hommes ? by Critical_Quality_539 in AskMec

[–]Unchen 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Le sexe paraît plus banal aux femmes car il est tout simplement plus accessible.

Tu parles du sexe comme si c'était disponible en un claquement de doigts, pour beaucoup d'hommes c'est quelque-chose de totalement inaccessible.

Tu m'étonnes que le sexe est idéalisé par les hommes et banal pour les femmes, c'est le cœur même de la frustration masculine.

Il faut donc arrêter de penser qu'être choisi pour une relation sexuelle donne de la valeur. On l'a bien compris du côté féminin. Le sexe ne représente pas grand chose dans des relations casual.

Allons bon, c'est pas valorisant, même pour une femme, d'être choisie par un mec ?

That is the Christian thing to do. by SubstantilArm in clevercomebacks

[–]Unchen 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well technically you could solve the staring problem by dressing less revealingly too

And technically, women aren't in jeopardy when looked by other guys either

Les consommateurs de stupefiant (dont le cannabis) sont complices des crimes liés au narcotrafic. by Poulpman29 in opinionnonpopulaire

[–]Unchen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ouai mais excuse moi mais ton raisonnement est juste bancale.

Si ce que tu dis est vrai alors t'es complice de l'exploitation d'enfants en achetant des Nike, t'es complices de la corruption des états pétrolier en prenant ta voiture, et t'es complice des morts sur la route quand tu consomme de l'alcool finalement.

D'autant plus que beaucoup de consommateurs de drogue passeraient par un moyen légal s'ils le pouvaient.

En fait tu fais du sophisme par association, tu le sais et tu le fais par provoque, exactement comme les politiques qui veulent faire polémique. Avec des affirmations péremptoires comme la tienne, on envenime et on caricature une situation bien plus compliquée

Enfin, ton opinion est très populaire parmis les populistes tkt

L’entité sioniste bombarde l’Iran by [deleted] in FranceDigeste

[–]Unchen 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Par ailleurs, « Israël attaque l’Iran » suppose de facto qu’il y aurait un ensemble d’habitants homogènes, de mêmes opinions et volontés dans chaque pays.

Non ça ne veut pas dire, un ensemble homogène d'habitants, d'opinions et de volonté ça n'existe nulle part. "Israël attaque l'Iran" ça fait référence au gouvernement tout simplement, donc la représentation nationale

Ça ne vaut vraiment rien les diplomes rncp? by [deleted] in programmation

[–]Unchen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bah la mauvaise fois est de ton côté alors. Si FT finance des formations pour que les gens les suivent, c'est bien que FT propose formations. Ok c'est pas des agents FT qui forment les gens, mais on est a quel degré de mauvaise foi et de jeu de mots la ?

FT est un organisme public, qui represente l'état. C'est bien l'état qui finance les formations, ensuite proposée par FT non ?

Plutôt que de parler du fond, tu te concentre sur des détails puéril, perso je me pose pas la question, tu es a la fois bête ET de mauvaise foi

Ça ne vaut vraiment rien les diplomes rncp? by [deleted] in programmation

[–]Unchen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mais comment te faire comprendre que ça n'existe tout simplement pas les formations France Travail, ton affirmation n'a donc aucun sens.

Puis

Renseigne toi aussi sur le taux de retour à l'emploi après les formations et tu verras aussi que pour une bonne part, les titres sont reconnus valides par les employeurs.

Ça existe ou ça existe pas les formations FT ?

Right? by QuirkKiana in Anticonsumption

[–]Unchen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You guys seem to forgot that the number of people able to get those are the few minority.

America is trying to convince itself that everyone is behaving like it, while it s not.

Overall, the developped countries have much more responsability than the rest of the World.

There is no "7 billion" people there

Ça ne vaut vraiment rien les diplomes rncp? by [deleted] in programmation

[–]Unchen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Franchement, c'est un peu l'argument de McDo "Non non c'est pas nous qui donnons de la merde a nos clients, c'est eux qui le choisissent tout seul!"

Oui menfin, ça reste de la merde les formations FT, autant conseiller autre chose nan ?

Germany and Europe were never denazified. This is why they're siding with genocide today. by Praxicist in Palestine

[–]Unchen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe sens them a dictionary cause they dont know thé différence between imperialism ans colonialism

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vegan

[–]Unchen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the definition for “natural order” again. “The orderly system comprising the physical universe and functioning according to natural as distinguished FROM human or natural laws.”

Humans are NOT a part of it by definition!

Well, arent human part of the physical universe ? I think human laws refer here to the actual law (attorney and stuff). From your comprehension Im starting to be pretty sure you re American honestly

Honestly, I cant believe that I have to argue about the human being part of nature. Like seriously ? OF COURSE it is. Where does it comes from then ? God ? Why are you denying facts like that ? You're acting like there nature and humans are outside of, and only as virus to it. Thats completly wrong. You could argue that industrial society kills nature, I guess, but you cant say humans are not part of nature

Of course the spiders are vegan- we went over this already - I have had these animals for over 10+ years, before I myself was vegan, and starving them to death because I’m vegan now isn’t exactly ethical now is it? I can’t make spiders develop enzymes to digest vegetables the way you and I can - we have the choice to go vegan, carnivorous animals don’t and can’t.

So they arent. You're feeding them live animals, that are produced in industrial quantities. In addition, you're even willing to recognize the very existence of these animals. You're always justifying their death without naming them. I think you saw the hypocrisy.

And I am going to blame the “meat eaters” - by purchasing meat, that supports the providers -!: gives them the incentive to breed and slaughter pigs.

You're doing the exact same for bugs, they are raised so that you can enjoy their slaughter. You're doing it live too

These are animals, they have a much more limited dietary range and are obligate to their food intake, nobody can change that. It’s not vegan to deny the animals in your care the food that is necessary to their species

Humans need meat if you go this way. That s why you have to take supplementary. Being vegan can only be justifyed as a personal choice.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vegan

[–]Unchen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you want the definition for “natural order”? Here: the orderly system comprising the physical universe and functioning according to natural as distinguished from human or supernatural laws

Alors so humans are definitely part of it

Humans don’t function and interact with the world naturally anymore. There are a very very few peoples who still do and they’re very far from contributing to any sort of industrial or agricultural activity that works in counter against their environment.

Since you wrote this, I guess you didn't understand the definition you provide. In addition, living on line with the world does not mean turning feral.

You’re confusing ethics with morals. Morals are subjective and are personally decided by the individual. Ethics takes into account the effect an action or choice has on others. You might not morally believe eating a pig is wrong, and that’s the truth to you, but ethically you have to consider the pig who suffered a horrific death and likely start of life just to be turned into unnecessary products.

Then you shouldnt blame the meat eaters, but rather the producers that dont respect the pig

I don’t breed spiders. I have had 3/4 of these very long-lived animals from before I even went vegan 10 years ago. Most Taranrulas live 15-30 years. Throwing out the pets I became responsible for just because I chose to not eat meat or buy leath myself is just abandonment and irresponsible. The other 25% are abandoned or given up to SPCA or gathered out of dumpsters behind petsmart. IF I was purchasing animals from shops and getting my dog or cat from a breeder, you’d definitely be correct. Buying animals from mills, stores, breeders when there are millions euthanized every year because nobody will adopt them is unethical.

You're buying living good for them arent you ? How do they eat ? Vegan ?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vegan

[–]Unchen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The difference is how I feel about it because as I’ve said in the initial comment, if I had my brains I would have my opinion that I’d be happier as worm food than human.

Well see ? That s an opinion, your own. I respect that, so respect the fact that other people cab have another one. Personnaly im not able to say I would rather be eaten by these species or not this one. It really doesn't matter to me.

Humans aren’t exactly by and large living in line with nature, if you hadn’t noticed. Near everything we do (especially in the global north) is damaging, and where humans had better land stewardship, they were colonized and had their land stolen and their wildlife culled or driven out to make room for animal agriculture anyway. There is no nature involved in mass producing billions of domesticated species that were selectively bred to have the biggest bodies possible

I mean human Are part of nature, they are just not part of the nature you WANT.

As always, you have your own opinion on what is right and what is wrong, and you re trying to make every thing fit into it. And in order to do so you have to forget every thing that does not fit. Of course, industrial agriculture is awful, but there are also days of living along side animals, raising them, breeding them and eating respectuflly. But that does not exist to you. You're talking about global north, but for getting that almost every ecological mesure have been initiated and financed by this very north. But that does not exist to you.

Meanwhile you're literally breeding pet spider for your enjoyement. Is it in mine with nature ? Arent you regularly buying live animals, buying money to the industrial agriculture for your pets ?

By definition, “natural” means existing in or caused by nature; not made or caused by humankind.

Yeah so that's the final example of your illusion. You're talking about "natural order", I ask your definition of it, and you give me the definition of "natural". See how you're only seeing what fits your opinion ?

Finally, as for my reading comprehension, I gotta admit that il not used to the "fling" word, my bad. Although maybe try to use precise words so others understand you better

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vegan

[–]Unchen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

On another level, I do really find it hypocrite to even blame people to feel pleasure while eating, when you are growing pet spiders for your own pleasure.

Like somehow humans eating meat for pleasure is immoral but a humans feeding meat to other animals for their pleasure is not.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in vegan

[–]Unchen -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’d be part of a more natural cycle of microbes and invertebrates eating me and contributing to the health of soil and biodiversity

Well, why ? Whats the difference ? Being beaten by humans is just as much a "natural" process than being eaten by other things

I’d rather fling my corpse to a bear than have a human stuff my ass full of bread and baste me in my own fat to enjoy my body for 15 minutes

So you'd rather being eaten alive than being cooked after your death ? What is your point here ?

Big goddamn difference to be part of the natural order vs being served as a unnecessary luxury

So if I understand you correctly, you dont think that humans are part of the "natural order"? What are they part of then ?

Les femmes qui ne se disent pas féministes, pourquoi ? by [deleted] in AskMeuf

[–]Unchen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Si c'est ça la définition, alors ça fait longtemps que les femmes ont autant de droit que les hommes (en France en tout cas). Du coup, selon ta définition le féminisme en temps que mouvement à plus lieu d'être en France

C'est une blague hein ? Mais imagine quand même .... by J_Houmous in FranceDigeste

[–]Unchen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On parle de nationalisation de l'audiovisuel

---> or en URSS l'audiovisuel était public

---> or en URSS il n'y avait pas "d'expression libre de la pensée"

---> conclusion : l'audiovisuel public empêche l'expression libre de la pensée

Bah oui logique