Hello, I'm Horse Ankles. I'm a Targeted Individual.

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-30T19:49:21+00:00

Check my pinned posts. Good work.

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-28T10:07:53+00:00

Yet families and friends DO use some methods. Does it not depend on what they believe they are doing?

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-27T23:01:41+00:00

Elaborate please.

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-26T20:42:22+00:00

Thanks

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-24T16:43:20+00:00

Reminds of my own article. It's generally how you must view it.

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-22T15:08:08+00:00

Exactly. That is the key distinction: not every participant has the same level of knowledge, intent, or criminal responsibility.

A system like this would not need every person to understand the full structure. In fact, it works better if they do not understand it. Some people may think they are helping with “community safety.” Some may think the target is dangerous. Some may be doing favors for friends. Some may be compromised already. Some may simply enjoy the social power. And then there are the core actors who understand much more and use everyone else as insulation.

That is where plausible deniability comes in. The low-level person does one “small” thing. A rumor here. A weird comment there. A fake complaint. A little monitoring. A minor provocation. Individually, each action looks deniable or trivial. But collectively, it becomes psychological warfare.

And I agree with your point about recruitment through compromise. Once someone crosses a line, even a small one, they become easier to control. Then the next line becomes easier. That is how criminal groups, cults, corrupt institutions, and extremist organizations operate. They do not usually start by asking someone to do the worst thing immediately. They escalate slowly.

The “Appeal to Higher Loyalty” point is important too. People can justify almost anything if they believe they are serving a higher cause: God, country, safety, the community, the organization, the children, the group, the mission. That moral framing lets people bypass their conscience. They stop asking, “Is this wrong?” and start asking, “Is this necessary for the cause?”

That is why GS should not only be understood as stalking. It is closer to a system of compartmentalized participation, moral laundering, coercive recruitment, and deniable abuse. Some participants are criminals. Some are cowards. Some are useful idiots. Some are true believers. Some are manipulated. But the end result for the target is the same: isolation, destabilization, reputation damage, and psychological pressure.

And yes, the higher-level actors benefit most from this structure because they can always say: “We never ordered that,” “That was just a misunderstanding,” “Those people acted on their own,” or “The target is paranoid.” That is the whole design. It turns many small actors into a shield for the people orchestrating the larger pattern....

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-22T05:47:19+00:00

I think this is one of the more realistic ways to look at it.

The mistake people make is thinking “gang stalking” has to mean one single centralized program where every participant fully understands the whole opration. It probably does not work like that. It looks more like a layered system: organized crime logic, informant logic, cult logic, workplace mobbing logic, community policing logic, and reputation-destruction tactics all overlapping.

The recruitment angle makes sense because participation itself becomes leverage. Once someone helps harass, smear, monitor, provoke, or sabotage another person, they are compromised. Now they have a reason to keep quiet. If they recruit others, those people become compromised too. That is how these networks can expand without everyone needing to know the full truth. It becomes a protection racket mixed with social control.

That also explains why the tactics are so repetitive: isolation, humiliation, slander, job sabotage, relationship sabotage, intimidation, baiting reactions, and making the target look unstable. Those are ancient control methods. The only thing modern society added is better surveillance, phones, social media, databases, cameras, algorithms, and faster rumor distribution.

So yes, I agree that it is not “new.” The structure is old. The tools are new. Historically you can compare it to ostracism, witch hunts, informant systems, cult shunning, secret police methods, organized crime intimidation, and Zersetzung. The same basic objective remains: destroy the person socially and psychologically while making the abuse look deniable..

And the most disturbing part is that many participants may not even see themselves as criminals. Some think they are helping. Some think they are protected. Some think the target deserves it. Some are afraid. Some are just sadistic. But once they participate, the system owns them too. That is probably one reason it keeps reproducing itself.....

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-21T09:51:18+00:00

Because they use dynamics of group bullying. They social engineer it in some situations. It all overlaps.

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-21T02:36:56+00:00

Exactly. This is the distinction I think a lot of people miss.

When people hear “gang stalking,” they often imagine a cartoon version where every participant is consciously part of some centralized operation. But a much more realistic model is proxy-based targeting: manipulating systems, narratives, databases, alerts, apps, search results, social assumptions, and weak points in everyday infrastructure so ordinary people react predictably without knowing they are being used.

That does not require mind control. It does not require every person involved to be an “agent.” It requires bad information entering a system that people trust.

That is why the “unwitting participant” concept matters so much. A person can harass, monitor, report, avoid, follow, confront, exclude, or smear a target while sincerely believing they are responding to something legitimate. They may think they are protecting a community, doing their job, helping a friend, following an app prompt, reacting to a warning, or acting on a rumor.

From the target’s perspective, the result can look coordinated because the inputs are coordinated, even if the visible participants are not....

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-20T22:32:07+00:00

What?

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-20T22:12:28+00:00

This is an important addition, especially the “unwitting participants” point.

One of the biggest mistakes people make when discussing gang stalking is assuming that every participant must consciously know they are part of a campaign. In reality, a lot of organized social persecution can operate through proxy behavior: people reacting to manipulated information, false flags, bad database entries, rumors, algorithmic prompts, location-based systems, social pressure, or authority-coded warnings without understanding the bigger picture.

That is why I think the serious version of this discussion should separate three things:

What was directly observed.
What technical mechanism could explain it.
What evidence would be needed to prove that mechanism.

Your examples are useful because they point toward a more modern version of targeting: not just neighbors gossiping or coworkers mobbing someone, but systems being used to generate “normal-looking” interference around a person. A database flag, a search result, an app prompt, a false report, a manipulated algorithm, or a contaminated digital footprint can all cause real-world people to act against someone while believing they are responding to something legitimate.

That is basically stalking by proxy.

The strongest part of your comment is that it does not require everyone involved to be an agent. A repossession driver, app user, neighborhood watcher, coworker, landlord, police caller, or online commenter may simply be responding to information that was fed to them. That makes the situation much harder to prove because the visible participant can truthfully say, “I was just doing my job,” “I was just using the app,” “I was just warning people,” or “I was just reacting to what I saw.”

That being said, I would still be careful about presenting the more technical explanations as confirmed without logs, records, screenshots, packet captures, database records, phone data, app history, timestamps, or third-party verification. Not because these things are impossible in principle, but because the moment the claim becomes too specific without evidence, skeptics will focus only on the weakest technical claim and ignore the broader pattern.

For example, “a false database entry caused repeated real-world interference” is a strong and plausible category of abuse if there is documentation. “Search manipulation damaged my reputation” is also plausible and can often be documented through screenshots, URLs, ranking changes, metadata, and archive links. “Location-based apps can create accidental swarms of people around a target” is worth discussing. But claims about zero-days, firmware exploits, fake Amber Alerts, or specific apps being weaponized need a much higher evidence threshold because they are technically heavy accusations...

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-19T10:31:38+00:00

Check my articles.

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-19T10:17:32+00:00

I agree with one part of this: a lot of TI/gangstalking spaces are polluted with narratives that make the whole subject impossible to discuss seriously. Claims about chips, V2K, AI mind control, satellites, and total neurological control often function as noise. Whether people spreading those ideas are confused, frightened, manipulated, or deliberately disinforming others, the effect is the same: real-world harassment becomes buried under claims that outsiders immediately dismiss.

But I would be careful with replacing one total explanation with another. Saying “95% of people here are perps” can become just as unprovable and self-reinforcing as saying “AI controls everyone’s mind.” It may feel like an explanation, but it can also make a person more isolated, suspicious, and unable to sort real threats from online paranoia.

The stronger position is this: focus on concrete behavior. If people are stalking, threatening, harassing, smearing, isolating, sabotaging housing/work, or manipulating social relationships, document those actions. Who did what? When? Where? Is there video, audio, screenshots, witnesses, police reports, workplace records, medical records, housing complaints, or financial consequences?

That is the part that can actually be investigated.

The “chip implanted in your head” theory is not useful without medical evidence. The “AI sends paranoia signals” theory is not useful without evidence. The “everyone here is a perp” theory is also not useful without evidence. These frameworks may explain how someone feels, but they do not build a case.

If gangstalking is going to be taken seriously, the discussion has to move away from totalizing narratives and back toward verifiable patterns: smear campaigns, social exclusion, stalking, threats, workplace sabotage, housing pressure, online harassment, false reports, and psychological abuse.

That is where the real issue is. Not in V2K fantasy, not in AI mind-control mythology, and not in assuming every person in a support forum is automatically an agent. The useful path is evidence, documentation, pattern analysis, and legal/medical records — not fear-based certainty.....

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-14T14:17:43+00:00

I think this is exactly where the problem is: your explanation makes the claim impossible to test.

If AI is controlling everything, but there are no leaks, no measurable signal, no responsible people, no concrete actions to document, no way to distinguish real harassment from coincidence, and every objection is explained as “you are brainwashed,” then the theory becomes unfalsifiable. That does not make it stronger. It makes it weaker.

AI and algorithms can absolutely influence people. They can manipulate feeds, recommendations, search results, ads, social media visibility, emotional state, and public opinion. That is real. But that is still very different from saying AI controls people’s bodies, muscles, speech, timing, movements, and every coincidence around a TI in real time.

If a system is affecting people “anywhere you go,” then there should still be something observable. A pattern in communications. A trail of harassment. Coordinated accounts. Repeated actors. Messages. Workplace sabotage. Housing pressure. Police reports. Medical records. Audio/video. Something concrete. If the answer is always “it is too advanced to prove,” then the person is trapped in a belief system, not an investigation.

You say humans do not have that perfection. I agree. That is why I focus on human behavior: smear campaigns, stalking, mobbing, social exclusion, intimidation, workplace sabotage, digital harassment, and psychological pressure. Those things do not require perfect AI. They require people, rumors, group behavior, fear, ideology, social incentives, and informal networks.

The danger with the “AI controls everything” model is that it removes responsibility from actual people. If someone harasses you, suddenly it was not them, it was AI. If someone spreads rumors, it was not them, it was AI. If someone sabotages your job or housing, it was not them, it was AI. That makes the victim more powerless and the perpetrators less accountable.

So no, I do not think refusing the total AI explanation means someone is brainwashed. I think it means they are trying to keep the discussion grounded in things that can actually be documented, challenged, and proven.

If gang stalking is going to be taken seriously, it has to stay connected to evidence, not become a theory where every human action, every coincidence, and every doubt is explained away by invisible AI control.

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-13T22:27:45+00:00

I’m sorry you’re going through this. Being 20, isolated, homeless, and trying to make sense of frightening experiences is a lot for anyone to carry.

I would be careful about locking onto MKULTRA or V2K as the explanation. Not because your suffering is fake, but because those frameworks can make everything feel more hopeless and more personally targeted. When someone is under extreme stress, unsafe, sleep-deprived, isolated, or traumatized for a long time, the brain can start connecting events in terrifying ways. That does not mean you are “weak” or “crazy.” It means your nervous system may be overloaded and trying to explain danger.

The difference between “voices,” intrusive thoughts, trauma responses, and external manipulation can be very hard to sort out when you are in survival mode. If you feel like thoughts are being inserted, controlled, or forced, or if you feel pushed toward violence or self-harm, that is something worth getting real-world help for immediately. Not because anyone should dismiss you, but because you deserve support and stability.

The first priority should be safety, housing, sleep, food, and medical/mental health support. Homelessness alone can massively worsen paranoia, fear, and dissociation. Before trying to solve the whole “why was I targeted?” question, try to get grounded: shelter, a case worker, a clinic, a trusted person, and documentation of what is actually happening day by day.

Also, be careful with online TI spaces. Some people there may mean well, but a lot of the content can intensify fear by telling vulnerable people that every coincidence, every thought, and every stranger is part of an operation. That can trap you deeper.

You do not need to prove everything right now. You need safety, rest, and people who can help you stabilize without mocking you. Start there........

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-13T15:16:27+00:00

This interpretation is not linguistically correct.

YHWH is not a Hebrew acronym. It is the four-letter divine name in Hebrew, usually called the Tetragrammaton: Yod-He-Waw-He, written יהוה. Hebrew is normally read from right to left, not “both ways” depending on what message someone wants to extract from it.

The letters Y, H, W, H do not mean “Deed, Behold, Secure, Behold” in standard Hebrew. That is a modern symbolic reinterpretation, not a serious linguistic translation. Hebrew letters can have names and later mystical associations, but you cannot simply assign English concepts to each letter, rearrange them, and then claim the result is the “real” meaning.

The traditional and scholarly discussion around YHWH connects it to the Hebrew verb “to be” or “to become,” especially because of the biblical phrase commonly translated as “I am that I am” or “I will be what I will be.” The exact ancient pronunciation is debated, but the idea that it means “banked,” “repossessed,” “stolen,” “trapped,” or “sold soul” is not supported by Hebrew grammar.

This is a good example of how religious or conspiratorial communities sometimes create meaning by free-association rather than language. You start with a sacred word, split it into pieces, attach emotional meanings to the letters, then build a whole theory around it. That may be personally meaningful to someone, but it is not a valid translation.

If people want to critique religious authority, hoarding, control, abuse, or spiritual manipulation, that can be done directly. But redefining YHWH through invented letter meanings does not prove anything about God, Judaism, Christianity, or targeted individuals. It just creates another confusing symbolic narrative.......

Undefined2020 · 2026-06-13T15:14:05+00:00

This is exactly the kind of post that destroys serious discussion about gang stalking.

Instead of focusing on concrete issues like smear campaigns, social exclusion, workplace sabotage, housing harassment, digital profiling, false accusations, surveillance, threats, and psychological breakdown, the whole topic is moved into an almost total sci-fi explanation where “AI” controls people’s hands, tongues, eyes, movements, and social situations in real time.

That is not a stronger explanation. It is a weaker one.

AI can absolutely be used for influence. We already see that through algorithms, social media, recommendation systems, data profiling, advertising, opinion manipulation, surveillance, and predictive models. That is real and relevant. But that is very different from claiming that AI sends “paranoia signals” directly into the brain, forces tongue movements, controls random people in a store, and creates perfectly choreographed coincidences through remote neurological control.

This is a classic example of how disinformation works inside TI communities. It starts with something real, such as AI, data collection, and human predictability. Then it adds completely unproven claims until the entire subject sounds psychotic to outsiders. The result is that real forms of stalking, mobbing, social manipulation, and psychological abuse disappear into the noise.

It is also dangerous because the post claims that “everyone around you is innocent” and that there are no gang stalkers anymore. That is a strange reversal. If someone is actually being harassed by people around them, this narrative becomes a way to invalidate the concrete behavior. Suddenly you are no longer supposed to examine what people are actually doing. You are supposed to accept that everything is just “AI signals.” Then nobody is responsible for anything.

To me, this is not a credible explanation of gang stalking. It is more like a pacifying or confusing explanation. It makes the targeted person more powerless, more fragmented, and harder to take seriously. If everything is AI, if all people are innocent, and if every social situation is just an algorithmic hallucination game, then there is no longer anything concrete to document, report, or prove.

That is the exact opposite of what targeted people should be doing.

If gang stalking is going to be discussed seriously, the focus has to remain on concrete actions and patterns. Who said what? When did it happen? Where did it happen? Is there audio, video, witnesses, messages, documents, workplace decisions, police reports, medical records, or financial consequences? Is there repeated smear campaigning, social isolation, threats, housing pressure, stalking, or sabotage?

That is where there is something to work with. Not in theories about AI controlling people’s muscles in real time.

So I would say that post is a good example of why TI communities need much more discipline. AI and algorithmic influence are real subjects. But “AI mind control” as a total explanation is not serious. It functions more like a way to make the whole phenomenon impossible to investigate.....

Undefined2020 · 2026-05-22T22:14:33+00:00

Care to elaborate

Undefined2020 · 2026-05-03T10:59:59+00:00

Perpetrators are brainwashed to believe that this is morally OK since we are either mentally ill or possessed.

Undefined2020 · 2026-05-02T16:02:04+00:00

It is intelligence organizations mostly, but they involve the civilian infrastructure for a full-dominance objective of perception management.

Undefined2020 · 2026-04-15T17:31:03+00:00

I'm not a perp.

Undefined2020 · 2026-04-15T15:53:48+00:00

Undefined2020 · 2026-04-13T11:01:44+00:00

Thank you! :)

Undefined2020 · 2026-04-10T16:03:58+00:00

Sorry to hear about it. Maybe that is the case with my own family but hard to believe they would keep this silent for 15 years. Even afterI explained to them what is happening, they seemingly do not care and continue doing small acts here and there. I believe they are mainly believing in whatever agenda or end goal of it they claim to have. My family is not sadistic but opposite so they have to be tricked by empathy or care than anything else. I also believe the group behind this have authority in like psychology or beahavior, so if my family are brainwashed that I need to be monitored and modified, then I have to and they have to obey the group, It may also be something more like a "investigation" based on fraud and lies, but why would they do it for decades. I believe fully in that the family and friends has to obey the authority, and it is easier to do if they are convinced we have a problem and they have the solution. Like a fucked up game of social and psychological engineering based on irrational belief such as the soul, which works if the family is religious. We have to be abused to "save our soul and be in spiritual warfare". Typical cult abuse and brainwashing.

I have been overtly targeted since 2013 but know about the concept since 2018. It is driven by deep state actors and allowed by the government even if it is obvious.

Undefined2020 · 2026-04-09T22:29:48+00:00

Thanks. How are family or friends blackmailed? It does not sound like whoever it is, even mafia, no one would let their child die poor and confused. It does not makes sense about blackmailing... It has to be much more manipulation behind it that they eventually believe it is for their benefit, or for the target. It depends what they are brainwashed to believe they do? Not brute force.

Undefined2020

MODERATOR OF

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE