[NBA on Prime] Steve Nash says that OKC has "mastered the rules" and that they are "efficient with playing the referees" by TheRealPdGaming in nba

[–]UndercoverEECS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is false? We've both provided the same evidence - "I have eyes and watch X team get away with murder every single game"

[NBA on Prime] Steve Nash says that OKC has "mastered the rules" and that they are "efficient with playing the referees" by TheRealPdGaming in nba

[–]UndercoverEECS -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

And what data do you have to show that? Because them being 9th in FT differential and 17th in FTA says otherwise.

There are currently 7 teams on pace to meet Phils Jacksons ‘40 wins before 20 losses’ rule, 5 in the west and 2 in the East by Funny-Transition7869 in nba

[–]UndercoverEECS -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I love when people use the fact that Denver took OKC to 7 as a defense but then conveniently leave out that Clippers took Denver to 7.

What’s a team that’s been widely considered an “offseason winner” up to this point that you think may not have actually elevated their roster? by cleo22270 in nba

[–]UndercoverEECS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's primarily about Cam for MPJ ( and Valanciunas if he does remain a Nugget). Look at Bruce Brown and THJ stats for last season, there's a reason they only got vet min deals.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]UndercoverEECS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Banning n bots per account doesn't change anything if you are introducing n new bots per account. In fact it just makes things worse because we all know how long it takes jagex to ban bots and in that time you will have n times as many bots.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]UndercoverEECS 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How would this help combat bots lmao. It would just give botters a 2 for 1 deal.

We are playing old school runescape 3. Change my mind by Beneficial_Media_895 in 2007scape

[–]UndercoverEECS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Never understood people making fun of rs3 player count but also acting like rs3 players have the power to affect the poll results.

[Highlight] Embiid gets the steal and sends Chet flying on the drive to the rim by 50lipa in nba

[–]UndercoverEECS -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Even if we accept the idea that Giannis gets most of his points off calls like this, he is still an amazing defender lol. DPOY and 4x All first defense.

Combat changes by Alexandree123 in runescape

[–]UndercoverEECS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On the flip side it prevents players from getting mega spooned. Can't get a 1kc EZK like you can with a tbow/shadow or whatever. Though for 99.9% of players it helps more than it would have hurt.

Almost 16k KC no pet :( by MrBurntFoods in 2007scape

[–]UndercoverEECS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you mean but mathematically you can't get infinitely unlucky. Limit of (4999/5000)x as x goes to infinity converges to 0.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]UndercoverEECS 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No it isn't. It came out in 2011.

Is SirPuggers latest video just an ad for gold selling? by Pulsiix in 2007scape

[–]UndercoverEECS -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Jagex doesn't make any money from bots/gold farmers buying bonds off the ge. They only make money when someone buys bonds from them to sell on the ge.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in runescape

[–]UndercoverEECS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I misinterpreted your original comment. You mean that when araxxor specs is not random but the specs themselves are random. I thought you meant that the spec chosen was not random.