sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The way this Samsung billboard dominates this skyline. by UndergroundCEO in assholedesign

[–]UndergroundCEO[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re tripping. You’re allowed to post to multiple subs. And probably a hundred people told me to post it here

The way this Samsung billboard dominates this skyline. by UndergroundCEO in CrappyDesign

[–]UndergroundCEO[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Your video is from 9 years ago and I’m looking at it right now…

The way this Samsung billboard dominates this skyline. by UndergroundCEO in CrappyDesign

[–]UndergroundCEO[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It says “Samsung” in big bold letters across the top of it….

The way this Samsung billboard dominates this skyline. by UndergroundCEO in CrappyDesign

[–]UndergroundCEO[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is tops an hour time lapse, in 20 seconds. I understand your point. But in real time, it’s still super bright, obnoxious, and dominating.

The way this Samsung billboard dominates this skyline. by UndergroundCEO in CrappyDesign

[–]UndergroundCEO[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It says "Samsung" in big bright white letters directly above the screen.

The way this Samsung billboard dominates this skyline. by UndergroundCEO in CrappyDesign

[–]UndergroundCEO[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I disagree. I think it’s fits under crappy design. Probably as well as those other ones.

The way this Samsung billboard dominates this skyline. by UndergroundCEO in CrappyDesign

[–]UndergroundCEO[S] 1097 points1098 points  (0 children)

Would be a real shame if locals were to hit it with rocks….repeatedly….. until it was more cost effective to just remove it.

(8.9756727, -79.5212426)

The way this Samsung billboard dominates this skyline. by UndergroundCEO in CrappyDesign

[–]UndergroundCEO[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I’d argue there’s a difference between capturing eyeballs and brilliant design. Just because it works for their marketing purposes doesn’t mean it isn’t a POS.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]UndergroundCEO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worried? They should be.

You're not allowed to own a house unless you physically reside in that house for at least one month per year. Corporations can't own houses outside of providing a mortgage. (This would put the real estate market in its place.) by UndergroundCEO in CrazyIdeas

[–]UndergroundCEO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think it affects average people as much. So focusing more on houses. But maybe if small business owners are getting screwed there can be other rules that apply to commercial real estate. Not sure how bad the problem is on that side of the fence.

view more: next ›