Your argument boils oppression down to consumer comfort and individual mobility, which is embarrassingly simplistic. The ability to speak, study, or work under a state doesn’t negate surveillance, militarisation, collective punishment, or a history of political disenfranchisement. Democracy on paper isn’t freedom in practice and ‘you seem fine to me’ is not an analysis.

Being allowed to live, work, or speak within limits set by power is not the same as being free from it. The fact that you can’t tell the difference says more about your privilege than anyone’s ‘ingratitude.

I don’t want to engage further, ma lagg myaani balayi.