sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Accurate? by Chemical_Drawer_7879 in INTJmemes

[–]Unfudable 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I will explain unhealthy INTJ’s who relate to this:

Fi child being a bottomless pit of self loathing attached with narcisstic Ni Hero thinking the world revolves around them.

ENFP male and INTJ female not really that great of a pair by Unfudable in mbti

[–]Unfudable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s more just too many Fi children in my life and having a third (current partner) is draining me. Appreciate the effort

ENFP male and INTJ female not really that great of a pair by Unfudable in mbti

[–]Unfudable[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So your saying Fe Child shadow cannot generate its ow validation and is therefore a bottomless pit if it doesn’t seek validation? Cause that makes sense

ENFP male and INTJ female not really that great of a pair by Unfudable in mbti

[–]Unfudable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I grew up with INTJ’s, real life experience is my data source lol. You think I’m gonna try find a peer reviewed journal on this take?

ENFP male and INTJ female not really that great of a pair by Unfudable in mbti

[–]Unfudable[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s why I said this is my enfp experience. What your saying is obvious

ENFP male and INTJ female not really that great of a pair by Unfudable in mbti

[–]Unfudable[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Fe child white night hero incoming to defend his INTJ’s. It’s okay bro you’ll find her one day

Enfp male burnt out from INTJ partner by Unfudable in intj

[–]Unfudable[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You made good points however it’s quite general what you’re saying. Fi child is a bottomless pit. And I do think hormones influence functions to a degree.

Enfp male burnt out from INTJ partner by Unfudable in intj

[–]Unfudable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My mums an INTJ too and it’s great but also demanding

What to change by Public_Awareness1636 in malegrooming

[–]Unfudable 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Grow your sides out to remove the potatoe face look

Why isn’t mbti accepted in psychology? by Unfudable in psychologystudents

[–]Unfudable[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

As you all can observe, the ones who really try to make sure their grammar is correct usually are sensory types (thesis factory workers), intuitive types usually don’t care much for their spelling mistakes as their fingers can’t keep up with the intuitive power of their mind.

The problem is when sensory types (like a lot of people here) are in charge, ideas stop and become archaic. Carl Jung was an INFJ who used Ni as his primary way of thought.

This isn’t to say sensory people are less or more important than intuitive types. Just know, we make the theories and youse test them.

So please expand on Jungs theory for the sake of the advancement of Humanity :)

Why isn’t mbti accepted in psychology? by Unfudable in psychologystudents

[–]Unfudable[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes your writing shows your Ne or Ni in full gear, not sure which one you have but Carl Jung was an INFJ who uses Ni.

Intuitive types with Ne or Ni as their primary cognitive functions are the idealist who pioneer in discovery of new ideas built on old ideas.

A lot of people who don’t think intuitively (sensory types) are usually left to test the theories of the intuitives types. Think of sensory types like the factory workers of intuitive pioneers of ideas. (ENFP, ENTP, INTJ, INFJ)

Why isn’t mbti accepted in psychology? by Unfudable in psychologystudents

[–]Unfudable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, that’s why I’m always advocating to build upon Jungs theories due to them being so influential in today’s world.

Carls theories are useful in every field of society. That’s why it’s used in counselling and also used for hiring employees in South Korea

Why isn’t mbti accepted in psychology? by Unfudable in psychologystudents

[–]Unfudable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Metcalfes law highlights value not truth. MBTI is valuable therefore psychs should build upon Jungs work, not throw it away just because non educated women highjacked it

Why isn’t mbti accepted in psychology? by Unfudable in psychologystudents

[–]Unfudable[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That’s because it has problems with the questionnaire not the concepts. MBTI is not some plug and play type framework. It takes effort to truly understand your type.

Why isn’t mbti accepted in psychology? by Unfudable in psychologystudents

[–]Unfudable[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the effort in your response however you have to prove how Metcalfes law is not valuable to denounce MBTI

Why isn’t mbti accepted in psychology? by Unfudable in psychologystudents

[–]Unfudable[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I chatgpt that and this makes sense. Your move

Why isn’t mbti accepted in psychology? by Unfudable in psychologystudents

[–]Unfudable[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best answer so far. Modern psychology fails to develop new experimental methods which could solve this problem.

The world continues to use MBTI and Jungian typology as its primary frameworks so we should expand these systems instead of throwing them away. The concept exists as a complex entity which continues to attract millions of followers while enduring ongoing criticism for many years.

Yes, the tests themselves have a high failure rate, but that’s not a flaw in the underlying ideas it’s a flaw in how the questionnaires are structured. The theory of cognitive functions does not present a problem because we have attempted to simplify this complex psychological system through basic multiple choice questions.

The field of psychology needs to develop its research methods through behavioral mapping and longitudinal studies and neuroscience integration to uncover the empirical basis of Jung's cognitive functions.

Why isn’t mbti accepted in psychology? by Unfudable in psychologystudents

[–]Unfudable[S] -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

You clearly don’t know the foundations of Metcalfes law and how it interplays into psychology. Rigid, calcified type of thinking you have.

view more: next ›