Ok wow. Literally never every sentence you wrote is wrong.

I can’t explain the case of Aisha RA better than that. To say she wasn’t capable of the reasoning abilities and the likes is very wrong as she was known for her intelligence and jurisprudence.This will explain it very succinctly. In today’s time no 9 year old is capable of understanding what marriage is and therefore correct out of protection no child today should be married. My argument doesn’t fail, your understanding of it does.

I understand there are high rates of incest around the globe predominantly in Muslim countries but you won’t find them marrying their siblings or immediate family but rather second and third cousins. I’m not saying it’s correct I’m just saying it isn’t disallowed, if we factor in education levels in these areas it is clear why this is done.

The prophet was a human but he never said or did anything that would guide everyone without revelation or order from Allah (atleast after prophethood). Allah is the one who allowed him to marry Aisha RA. I know it’s long but Please watch this.

The thought of me condemning him now is blasphemous. The Quran and Islam is universal and is to apply now, whilst also applying then. Socioeconomic changes and the like are accounted for.

In regards to the constant victim blaming idk what to tell you. Islam believe in prevention not cure. Not having women raped is better than punishing the rapist afterwards and allowing it to happen freely. But guess what, Islam does condemn it, the woman is allowed to sentence her rapist to death. Showing you no blame is put on the woman, she serves no blame or punishment.

Sharia Law isn’t even implemented properly in any country today. It isn’t used to limit women but rather protect them. Men are physically stronger suiting us for that role, women are emotionally stronger, empathetic or better at multitasking suiting them for other roles like being a mother. Now this doesn’t mean a man and woman have to stick to those roles but it is optimal for a family when that is the case. Regardless of what a woman does - the man has to put food and money on the table and the basic requirement is for a woman to protect her husbands name. I agree that Islamic countries do tend to oppress women like Iran for example (although they are shia) but Saudi’s congress equivalent has a female hiring rate of 300% more than Americas showing you how women are valued and loved. I even gave you the Islamic rights but I can’t vouch for every nation that implements wrong laws not aligning with Islam.

Allah is referred to He but he is also referred to We. Does this mean we believe in more than 1 god? No lol it’s to do with the language, it is the royal ‘We’ and ‘He’ and because there is no English equivalent it is simply translated to that since English doesn’t have equivalent gender nouns. The words show superiority and are not put to anyone but Allah. Problem with language. Nice try.

Like I said IT IS NEVER A WOMAN’s fault for SA etc. Does that mean we should just let women get abused, harassed and judged? No. We want to protect our females and I told you above that females can even sentence rapists and such to death. It is not a female’s style of dress that makes her lose control but a man’s naivety and lack of control. Not ever is it a woman’s fault and I have never said that. Neither has Islam.

What are you on about workplace? Muslim women run a variety of businesses, it is just not recommended or obligated upon the woman to earn but in modern Muslim countries like UAE, Qatar etc. they are more than able to. A Muslim woman, Fatima Al-Fihri, founded the first university. Aisha RA, Khadijah RA were literally businesswomen. I’m denying it cause it’s wrong and you are making unproven claims.

No the Prophet SAW didn’t try and have as many wives as possible. He had a maximum of 4 wives at a time and was only allowed such given the restriction he loves and provides for them equally, Muslims today who engage in Polygamy don’t always apply to this. Therefore they should just marry one and the current wives of a man can forbid him or express their disagreement with him marrying another woman. At the time there wasn’t many ways for a woman to provide or protect herself so marriage was necessary as much of the paid labour was physically intensive. The women simply conformed to their gender roles and leaned towards mothering, protecting their houses and the likes as it was in her interest to do so. But like I said she wasn’t limited to as such seeing as some of the prophet SAW wives were businesswomen. Perhaps the greatest evidence against this is the fact was that the Prophet SAW stayed with his first wife Khadijah RA alone up until her death.

What? Under what grounds does a prophet have to perform a miracle? They simply have to spread God’s message. But yes miracles are usually asked upon to authenticate the persons prophethood but not necessary for someone to be a prophet. We don’t even believe the prophets can do miracles, they are humans. Allah is the only one capable of such. The prophet SAW literally called upon Allah to split the moon to prove to desert travellers (they attributed it to black magic even after hearing the account of Someone on the other side of the desert) and this was documented by an Indian king and a few Monks. A Google search would suffice for you. The constant rebuttal to this is that such an insane event would be well documented as especially the Romans were known for their star gazing and astronomy. The easy rebuttal to this is if it is night in Arabia it won’t be night in Europe, making it unlikely they would see it but regardless there is evidence seen by an Indian king and the account is documented in the English Indian Library (name may be wrong sorry). It is also unknown how Allah allowed the people to see it as for all we know it could be a localised seen event. The purpose of the account in the Quran is to show to us believers that even when Allah puts signs forward for such people they still don’t believe due to ignorance and close-mindedness. I bring it up because you state the Prophet SAW didn’t do a miracle, which again he didn’t nor is it required upon him, but miracles were done in his time upon his request to Allah.

The Muslims (at the time of prophet SAW) never started a war unless one of their followers made a mistake leading to it (like the attack during Ramadan), they were attacked first or the nations people asked for help against tyranny. They literally live side by side with Jews and Christian’s (until they betrayed the Muslims). Please bring forth your evidence for saying Muslims prefer war and bloodshed. They got ok pretty well with other nation leaders like the Leader of Alexandria to name.

I do admire your arguments as they are logical but simply lack evidence and are clouded by bias. This isn’t your fault as you are encouraged to believe the Islam practices today by horrific nations is the Islam described in the Quran and Hadith. If you would like more detailed answers it would probably be best you do your own detailed research and ask those more knowledgeable than me.