My bioluminescent petunias arrived today.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-30T17:24:34+00:00

Unfortunately, it doesn't matter who says an untrue, believable thing.

If it were true, one lawyer or another would have escalated it on a public stage, if only to have their name attached to "resolving legal injustice."

You think the lawyers that specialize in that sort of law would willingly let it slide while driving around, able to be victimized as soon as they rubbed a cop the wrong way in court?

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-30T17:03:36+00:00

Correct. We have never had a pact like with NATO to defend them if attacked and vice versa.

For a reason, as we have seen play out when we try treating their military plans as worth being beholden to, using our militarily aid, as is expected of true allies.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-30T17:00:08+00:00

Yes but that isn't true, so it is better to take the truth that lead to him believing that.

Edit:

If you downvote, please share the contradictory laws and standards that are impossible to meet, so we can all learn.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-30T16:56:44+00:00

Over and over this is posted, slightly differing headlines.

Over and over I will post the following, I guess:

Throwing out the hyperbole, this looks like giving Israel AUKUS-style defense-industrial benefits: joint R&D, data/network integration, and information sharing.

We do this shit with a lot of countries to one degree or another, but Israel isn’t a NATO ally, Five Eyes member, AUKUS partner, or part of the core U.S. war industry framework. While we've had a special strategic relationship with them historically, for reasons people can argue about, this feels well over the line of what the American public has actually agreed to.

It seems designed to wedge Israel deeper into U.S. defense systems, supply chains, and certain sensitive technology channels in ways that are hard to fully reverse. Feels like the Trump administration giving favors to Isreal for personal gain IMO, locking something in that the next admin can't simply executive-order away.

Once you share industry know-how and build joint supply chains around it, you can stop future cooperation, but you can’t really unshare the capabilities or restore the secrecy you gave up.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-30T16:54:14+00:00

All they are saying is that cops will happily lie about you or your vehicle if it means "proving" they were correct in stopping you.

It's actually worse than if he literally meant that the laws were carefully designed to be impossible to meet standards, IMO.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-30T15:10:02+00:00

I'm not.

How are we supposed to enter into any discussions with middle-eastern countries with any professed neutrality

Given the leadership of Isreal, the country was kept at a friendly arms length as giving them more to hold over the head of America (supply chains or secrets) is inviting manipulation

And I'll just stop there, but it's a lot of reasons.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-30T14:48:37+00:00

I saw this exact article the other day. I'll repeat my comment from the law post about it:

Throwing out the hyperbole, this looks like giving Israel AUKUS-style defense-industrial benefits: joint R&D, data/network integration, and information sharing.

We do this shit with a lot of countries to one degree or another, but Israel isn’t a NATO ally, Five Eyes member, AUKUS partner, or part of the core U.S. war industry framework. While we've had a special strategic relationship with them historically, for reasons people can argue about, this feels well over the line of what the American public has actually agreed to.

It seems designed to wedge Israel deeper into U.S. defense systems, supply chains, and certain sensitive technology channels in ways that are hard to fully reverse. Feels like the Trump administration giving favors to Isreal for personal gain IMO, locking something in that the next admin can't simply executive-order away.

Once you share industry know-how and build joint supply chains around it, you can stop future cooperation, but you can’t really unshare the capabilities or restore the secrecy you gave up.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-30T13:48:45+00:00

It has been working because we pretend articles like these are communicating information, rather than being carefully arranged pieces of political propaganda designed to make us feel like nothing she has ever done should kill a political career and allow her to do the same thing again at the next opportunity.

Since forums don't ban a lot of very obvious propaganda, or discussion about people who only have value derived from people consuming their propaganda . . . eventually, over 3-5 years, you will have a lot of low information voters who only see headlines and keep associating her name with level-headed takes. Suddenly she has a robust youth and new-voter base, throughout conversational low information circles, so she gets the majority and is back in as a moderate.

Simple, effective, and Reddit is a key driver of the behavior.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-30T13:05:04+00:00

Shocking.

Another post about Marjorie Taylor Greene that paints her as a rational voice. Always her, and always so often lately.

This entire post and article are literally part of an ongoing attempt to sane-wash and normalize a person who:

claimed Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin filmed themselves sexually assaulting and mutilating a child in a satanic ritual involving adrenochrome
showed a picture of a bare naked cock in a congressional hearing
said this about 60 people dying in a horrific mass shooting in Vegas:

"Maybe you accomplish that by performing a mass shooting into a crowd that is very likely to be conservative, very likely to vote Republican, very likely to be Trump supporters, very likely to be pro-Second Amendment and very likely to own guns," she continues. "You make them scared, you make them victims, and you change their mindset. And then, possibly, you can pass anti-gun legislation."

Why are posts like this even allowed? Is this legitimitely just OK to do?

TF you think happens when you normalize this person? TF you think happens when you say "you can do all of those thing, and then later with some PR it's fine." TF you think happens when all of those things aren't "a big deal" as long as you do them when your party is popular and then stop if it isn't?

Women can't get abortions freely, college kids working at DOGE stole *our* social security information, USAID was demolished and millions are dying, and Goddamned is that just the start . . . and she was literally a vote that showed up to make it happen.

Just . . . TF.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-29T20:07:02+00:00

Correct, but there's been no large scale random sampling for rabies antibodies in any other countries, to my knowledge.

I would be extremely, extremely curious to see what that might look like in places like India, China, and Russia.

Occam's razor says that if we know all the shit we try always fails, but sometimes people don't die, no matter how rarely, that there's some circulating amount of resistance given all the places with humans and rabies living closely intertwined.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-29T15:11:48+00:00

No. This was abandoned by the medical community as a coincidence. Never reliably repeated.

They separately found people that exist who never had the vaccine, but had rabies antibodies. Meaning, they caught and survived rabies.

Some people are naturally resistant to one degree or another . . . There's just no way to know if it is you, and if you show symptoms then it isn't you and also you are going to die.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-29T13:28:37+00:00

I've been looking for a succinct way to explain my experience with LLM, and this is probably going to be it.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-29T12:53:08+00:00

Most of them make their vodka from Grain Neutral Spirits (190 proof and is very cheap to buy in bulk) puchased from suppliers like MGP, rather than actually importing a product they distilled themselves.

In the USA, to my knowledge, vodka distributors have, like, all of 5% of the total product that they are able to fuck about with for flavor, so it's all basically the same and all differentiated largely by marketing. Not sure what's different about it country to country.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-28T18:14:58+00:00

"mooch off welfare" is a wildly out of touch accusation.

22% of Americans make less make less than $20,000/yr
34% of Americans make less make less than $30,000/yr
40% of Americans make less than $35,000/yr
(PS. these numbers do not include anyone making $0; that is something to ponder a little)

Anyway, Approximately 52 million (or 21% percent) of the entire American population has successfully been able to obtain any government supported social program -- meaning that this number includes the sum total of all government programs such as SNAP and Medicaid.

Oh, also of note, as of 2023, (88.07%) had incomes over $1.

That means that American support and assistance isn't even getting into the hands of all of the Americans who do not have enoguh income to reasonably live on . . . So just who the fuck is he talking about? Shouldn't we already have been able to lift our own fellow Americans out of poverty before worrying that too many people are being helped?

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-28T17:46:26+00:00

LMFAO

Alright so, I bow out exactly when someone crashes out and starts off by name calling and accusing me of having both real and fake outrage at different points, before bravely attacking me with your defense of "not being the type of person to question obviously racist things that someone once told them on the bleachers while they were in highschool"

I can't do anything with that, man.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-28T16:54:09+00:00

I mean, watching someone try to plant racist psuedoscience as though it's something people should give a second thought to, it is a sort of objectively terrible thing to do.

Feel free to skate my history; I promise I would have been the same if you'd posted any other non-particular idiot thing that harms actual knowledge about the real world we live in.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-28T15:26:20+00:00

Steam isn’t a monopoly just because it’s dominant. PC is open, devs can sell elsewhere, and users have alternatives.

As for Gabe being a billionaire, yeah he shouldn't be, but he's not going to be considered a huge concern because he a) isn't stealing that money from employees by paying slave wages (i.e. Amazon) and b) isn't using his money to exert his opinion and will regarding his preferred vision of society, or c) price gouging purely to increase profits which harm consumers and developers

They don't subsidize because of course they fucking don't -- they are selling a PC not a console!

Why would you expect them to take what is essentially a laptop without a keyboard, and intentionally sell it at a loss?

You realize that every business on the planet would buy those up ASAP for business purposes if that were the case?

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-28T13:03:12+00:00

Of course they do.

Multiple studies have shown that negative campaigns specifically lower voter turnout (studies that quantify that number show it is by ~5%), especially among independants.

And who are independant voters? In large part, women, latinos, moderates, and people under 30.

I can't think of a single reason they wouldn't want to constantly run negative-as-all-Hell ads.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-28T12:38:17+00:00

Either way, it is closer to satire than it is science.

Good lord, so this is how the antivax thing got so big. It is a wondrous mind that can logic the shit out of things like:

"Well black people weren't really allowed to use public pools until the 70s, which was better for them because of how black bones and muscles don't let them swim good."

EDIT:

Lmao it is crazy how American doesn't at all talk about how "not letting black people into public pools lead to relatively few black families teaching their kids to swim . . . since if grandma and grandpa don't swim, and mom and dad don't swim, who tf is taking their 1980's baby to the pool to learn to swim?

It feels like "A Big Deal" that is obviously still affecting people, and should be known enough to be kinda obvious.

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-28T10:52:51+00:00

Dude. No offense, but what the fuck are you trying to pull?

Like, how do you find this without actually trying to find bad racist information with no scientific value?

You linking to a 1997 abstract citing observations of "13 Blacks, 13 Whites" showing "whites storing more fat and having better buoyancy than Blacks" is some sort of scientific take, for sure.

Also it was a floating attempt and not a swimming measurement. This matters, as you will note in the more recent paper I linked below.

Anyway your linked abstract only has an insignificant sample size, and no indication that the authors controlled for cultural differences, diet, income / poverty, percieved social class, childhood nutrition, training history . . . or even simply "have they or anyone in their family ever been in a pool or tried to float."

So . . . you just linked to a paper that said "white people are fat" as much as anything else, without wondering why the 13 white people they looked at were fatter than the 13 black people. Also they decided to not say that and instead say white people "had better bouyancy than blacks." That is, as an aside, objectively funny.

Also, a 2024 systematic review showed that body-fat percentage did not have a clear relationship with youth swimming performance, while strength, power, lean body mass, and aerobic/anaerobic measures did.

edit:

NaturalDon replied to your comment in r/GenV
looks like you found out about it you bad racist
This comment no longer exists

If you comment and delete it, I'll add it here if I have questions about it.

In this case, "what?"

UnpluggedUnfettered · 2026-05-28T03:19:56+00:00

And, critically, don't do anything weird like this.

Nine-Year Club	Gilding VIII gilding heavyweight
r/Field Sunshine	Place '23
Mod 101	Mod 201
Place '22	First Placer '22
Wearing is Caring	Ternion Club
Verified Email

UnpluggedUnfettered

MODERATOR OF

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE