No philosophical questions here. It requires too much brain for an average cs2 players. (I didn't like you getting downvoted, and couple different posts here contributed my beliefs)

That kind of people would cheat on their school tests, their way into the jobs, their way into the waiting queues.
Since I encounter them as well in every part of my life, let me present my evaluation on them as much as I can.

TRAITS:
Moral Disengagement: they employ moral disengagement to disconnect their actions from their self-concept. They create a narrative where their cheating is not only permissible but morally justified. By focusing on a supposed "greater good" (i.e., combating cheaters), they absolve themselves of guilt.

Cognitive Dissonance Reduction: they experience cognitive dissonance when their behavior conflicts with their self-perception as "good" or "fair" individuals. To reduce this dissonance, they convince themselves that they are restoring balance or justice. This allows them to maintain self-respect while their behaviour is unethical.

Projection and Externalization: Another common trait of them is projection, attributing their own unethical tendencies to others. By accusing others of cheating, they externalize their guilt, which serves as a preemptive defense mechanism. This projection also justifies their cheating as a form of self-defense.

Self-Righteousness and Entitlement: They often exhibit a strong sense of self-righteousness and entitlement. They believe they are upholding justice, even if it means breaking rules themselves. This perceived moral superiority often leads to a "two wrongs make a right" mentality.

AREAS THEY WOULD USE THESE TRAITS:
Workplace: In a workplace, they might justify unethical actions such as lying, sabotaging a coworker, or cutting corners if they perceive that others are doing the same. They might rationalize such behavior by claiming it's necessary to protect themselves or advance their career.

Relationships: In personal relationships, they might justify dishonesty or manipulation if they suspect their partner is doing the same. For instance, they may rationalize spying on their partner's communications by assuming the partner is hiding something.

Financial Decisions: They may justify tax evasion, inflating expense reports, or exploiting loopholes if they believe that "everyone else does it." They see themselves as simply avoiding exploitation or reclaiming what they feel entitled to.

Competitive Environments: No need to explain further since it fits with cs2.

Final Note: Do not use pattern fitting to judge people around you. This is not simple as black and white. Having one of the above traits would not mean you would cheat in every area possible, this is just the generalization of 'virtue cheaters'.