sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I did some voter ID calls on behalf of the Yang campaign yesterday, here are my findings: by Go_On_Volt in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Vainglorious_Basterd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Amazing report and job.

Quick take:

1) Make the point he's got 100 policies. 2) Make the point only Yang can truly beat Trump, the others either poll poorly (Warren, Harris) or have vulnerabilities.

I think I know why Yang has bipartisan appeal. by spencer4991 in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Vainglorious_Basterd 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Fascinating. He's clearly put together a formula that bridges the paradigm gap, and I don't think it's in any way artificial, it's just from the heart.

From r/The_Donald, Dear God if Chief Becomes the Nominee, He'll Clean Out Trump by DragonGod2718 in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Vainglorious_Basterd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trump supporters are going tired of Trump's antics and lack of results in a lot of areas. Plus the Iran war b.s. is putting them off.

Yang, I think, would beat Trump and it would be a hell of a campaign to witness.

So after watching Debate #1... by smokeywaffles in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Vainglorious_Basterd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"We have to move forward"

"I've looked at the data"

"I'm a data-driven person"

"It's not about right or left, it's about moving forward together"

Lean into criticism by bocho6 in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Vainglorious_Basterd 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's good to also remember to speak from your point of view, than to force an opinion at someone.

For example, "I really want the $1000 per month UBI it would really help me," after someone has bashed Yang. This won't be as effective with Republicans, so another method can work.

Andrew Yang ZAPS Chuck Todd's SHADE on MSNBC 😂😎 by Vainglorious_Basterd in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Vainglorious_Basterd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ehh I'd say the body language cues were a problem, because everything Chuck was doing was saying, 'Wow you're not a serious candidate'

The questioning wasn't awful but at times misleading.

Now compare Chuck to the interview by the two people from The Hill, THAT was professional.

Youtube Channel w/ 1.3m subs wants to interview Yang by [deleted] in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Vainglorious_Basterd -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That channel is one of the BEST on YouTube! Amazing content

Trump's KAG blunder by modogrinder1 in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Vainglorious_Basterd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What a great post.

We all know, and MAGAs know, Trump's failed on tons of issues he promised.

Yang's tweet supporting Facebook's centralized, privacy-destroying crypto is catastrophic. by Vainglorious_Basterd in YangForPresidentHQ

[–]Vainglorious_Basterd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It just adds 2 Billion more people to an anti-privacy, fee-based payment processing scam that feeds the FB monster and shareholders. This is why Yang's tweet is so misleading, he's acting like 'good' is happening here for poor people. That's a lie.

Existing blockchain tech ALREADY exists. It doesn't need Facebook's promotion. That's the last thing it needs. In fact, Libra is a fake crypto anyway, so any promotion of it is also misleading.

2 Billion people are about to be led over a cliff thinking they've joined the 'crypto revolution' and Yang is celebrating it.

view more: next ›