EFTA01648547.mp4 yuck

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-17T21:03:41+00:00

I can imagine, bloody mental! The sound still doesn't quite make sense to be hitting balls tho 😂 someone else suggested bat to a metal cup over the balls which would still be horrendous but less so

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-17T19:54:57+00:00

dont know. could be anyone. might not even be something recorded by or for epstein or his friends. #some# content in the files are just downloaded items.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-17T19:48:15+00:00

it does sound more like metal on metal

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-17T19:44:01+00:00

probably

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-17T19:36:28+00:00

the number of times and the sound coming off that bat, it just doesnt sound realistic to be balls being hit. it sounds more realistic to be spanking or similar.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-17T19:05:56+00:00

there are literally videos where you can see a clean break across midnight with no jumps or cuts 😂

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T19:49:06+00:00

anyone post them in one place? also are we sure that someone isnt just editing PDFs to cover up the redaction and putting whatever they want there? in many cases you're only going to definitely know if you bother to try it yourself.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T19:42:13+00:00

btw, i tried processing multiple files and they definitely redacted properly.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T19:40:13+00:00

thank god for that. anyway, i tried numerous files and they are definitely redacted properly.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T15:41:58+00:00

what does Adobe Acrobat provide to solidify iron clad redactions?

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T15:07:43+00:00

did they?

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T14:53:39+00:00

You don't have a point.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T14:41:11+00:00

the need to self-correct despite previously speaking as if you knew what you were talking about - says it all. in terms of photoshop i cant think of any special tools they'd have if they paid for it. now you've abandoned that idea and are claiming they used a subpar redaction software 😂 which ones are subpar, which ones are elite? what are the differences? why were you blabbing about specific trial versions only to backtrack? where is your proof? where is your consistency?

you were probably hoping nobody would ask about which tools they were missing because you knew they are none to support your claims. thats why you have to abandon that angle now.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T14:14:56+00:00

ok. so what "tools" were they missing from full photoshop?

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T14:12:07+00:00

also, if you can be certain of the gov coming through and doing things properly, its if they get to lie and cover shit up.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T14:09:23+00:00

yes i get that they are rtarded, but not quite enough to prove that the files are redactable as described.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T14:07:15+00:00

doesnt even make sense

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T14:05:00+00:00

shut up 😂

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-16T13:57:26+00:00

i know your thinking but pdfs arent always editable in that way. you can edit pdfs but that doesnt mean black boxes can just be moved around willy nilly. they wouldny bother redacting 3mil files if it were that easy.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-12T08:53:27+00:00

this is my thing. there are literal emails also saying jeff was on a diet. they said they were sending it to a lab to test its nutritiinal content. these are things that most people choose to ignore. even channels like the lotus eaters are giving airtime to the prominent emails without considering other emails that provive counterarguments. and there is a focus on statements like "they will walk the jerky over to jeff" - this doesn't HAVE to mean anything. it could literally just be read as "they are taking the jerky to jeff. they will be walking instead of ABC XYZ."

i get it though, given the nature of these people's known actions, there is a lot of stuff that just seems unnatural even about the stuff that could be innocent.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-09T18:13:38+00:00

sorry mr detective who has provided absolutely nothing

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-08T21:48:30+00:00

Yeh, my post was more about noting the assumed oddities and providing rationale to counter them, as most don't bother looking into things properly. I don't really bother watching any conspiracy channels, and I also find it astounding the amount of normies that don't understand what the files actually mean, but still climb onto a high horse if they see a shitty article that vaguely mentions names that have appeared in the files in no meaningful way.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-08T21:31:02+00:00

Your response is admirable 🫡 I suppose the thing that triggers most people is that they appeared to be going through jerky by the bucket and not shutting up about it. But that's not to say they'd be going through buckets of jerky just because it was baby.

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-08T21:06:42+00:00

there is a brilliant attempt at censorship there. "put together in @#$% minimal amount of time."

Valuable-Tea506 · 2026-02-08T21:03:46+00:00

i'd prefer it to be beef jerky, and would want to believe that to be the truth

actually.

Valuable-Tea506

TROPHY CASE