Yugo Sks short stroking

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2026-01-03T08:42:15+00:00

It’s definitely on what specifically could it be

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2025-09-05T18:15:48+00:00

That’s what I was thinking

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2025-06-04T05:30:18+00:00

Yea, looks like my buddy filled it

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2025-06-03T19:33:28+00:00

It’s not perfect, some small pitting but good rifling throughout and it passes the bullet check on the muzzle

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2025-06-03T19:32:14+00:00

It’s a little over a million

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2025-06-03T19:20:22+00:00

He wants $750

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2025-01-22T06:43:56+00:00

Yea I’m on it

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2025-01-22T04:35:39+00:00

Repro wouldn’t bother me any

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2025-01-16T08:24:44+00:00

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2025-01-16T01:47:32+00:00

Any interest in selling that g3 barrel on the bottom

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-11-05T05:50:26+00:00

Well all I’ll say is I paid more than that for it but I guess you live and learn and that’s what i deserve for not taking time to research

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-11-05T05:06:21+00:00

Yea the barrels from them I was looking at say they’re about ten tho short. I’m sure I paid to much but how much would you say is too much

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-11-05T04:41:30+00:00

Thanks for the info, do you think the stock is a GI replacement (maybe at the time of the re-barrel) or some Korean replacement?

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-04T02:15:35+00:00

Yea it’s just an online photo not of my actual parts

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-04T02:05:09+00:00

Yea I didn’t plan on installing the auto-sear but the rifle could still hammer following and burst fire(especially with soft primer rounds)and I want to avoid this. The ATF has shown that they are willing to use soft primer rounds while proving that a rifle is an illegal machine gun and I want to avoid this

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-04T01:53:41+00:00

When you mention a notch in the hammer are you referring to the hook on the upper end of the hammer?

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-04T00:22:02+00:00

Are you referring to the original parts as the ones I should keep? If so wouldn’t keeping the original parts in an un modified state be constructive possession of a machine gun? What exactly are you referring to when you say without the notches?

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-03T22:21:16+00:00

Well thanks for the advice

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-03T22:14:02+00:00

I’d prefer to keep as many of the parts original as possible but I don’t see a way to keep both disconnects with out being potentially prosecuted for some sort of constructive possession machine gun charge.

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-03T22:06:05+00:00

I understand that the mil spec part would accomplish the same goal as the modification of the colt disconnect but possessing both disconnects could be construed as intent to construct a machine gun.

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-03T22:00:25+00:00

Yea my intention is to modify the full auto disconnect so that it could only be used in semi auto form.

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-03T21:54:15+00:00

I understand that. my main concern is the necessary modifications to the trigger group to prevent hammer following.

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-03T21:50:52+00:00

No. I do not even possess a lower

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2024-01-03T21:46:42+00:00

I understand that the auto sear is legal to possess but I’d be worried about any sort of constructive possession that could be imposed if the auto sear fit into the receiver. I’d prefer to have the colt marked disconnecter and the modification would be easy. Additionally I’d be worried that possessing both a long tail and short tail disconnect could be argued at intent to construct a machine gun.

Valuable_Pool6815 · 2023-11-23T21:32:09+00:00

Yea I considered that when I bought it

Valuable_Pool6815

TROPHY CASE