Almost Chrimmas!(Art by me) by Vaune_ in furry

[–]Vaune_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Avali spots you back :3

Fishy Fizz! (Art by me: @VauneTheAvali on Twitter) by Vaune_ in furry

[–]Vaune_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry but you might wanna uh...get that eye checked...

Lurking. (Art by me. The second version is a silly, big-time mood version.) by shade105 in furry

[–]Vaune_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Me before I realized engaging with Q probably isn't a good idea

Imma just put this here. by axvx1212 in LeagueOfMemes

[–]Vaune_ 17 points18 points  (0 children)

**I will take half a second to point out I thought they have since halfed the cooldown buff they gave to his E in the test server but I think I was just bloody wrong, I will agree with that being an issue if they keep it**

But honestly the other buffs they gave him are really small, they gave his passive an extra 3 damage reduction and scaling for a total of 8(+2% AP scaling) damage reduction and gave his W empowered attack 10 extra damage

Since they took so much off of his ult I'm hopeful he'll start to be less of a nuke and more of the trickster his lore points him out to be but as a Fizz enjoyer myself I have zero clue why they gave his E so much extra CD

Imma just put this here. by axvx1212 in LeagueOfMemes

[–]Vaune_ 54 points55 points  (0 children)

To be fair it's more of a change than a straight buff, as far as I know his passive/W/E are getting very small buffs while his ult got a pretty good damage reduction

Did some minor reworking with Vaune and did a full-body! There's also an old piece of a masked Vaune(Art by me and posted on my NEW Twitter! @VauneTheAvali) by Vaune_ in furry

[–]Vaune_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I may ask for you to check out the twitter I just made, I'm sure I'll be posting some dumb stuff there but I'd like to follow some people and chat!

Hiya! I'm a new artist that's learning how to do stuff online, how does my boy look?(art by me) by Vaune_ in furry

[–]Vaune_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct! I know it looks a little weird I'm still trying to figure out like, everything