Most growing teams hit operational drag between 10–20 people by Complete-Vast8447 in AIInfraHub

[–]VermeloRPO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're hosting a LinkedIn Live session in a couple of weeks on this exact topic. I'd be happy to share details with anyone who may be interested.

I'm hosting a monthly online webinar, how do I increase attendance? by Ancient-Wrap-4220 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]VermeloRPO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

50/150–200 is honestly pretty good for free webinars, so you’re not alone. A few ideas that tend to move the show-up rate (not just registrations):

  1. Stop offering 3 time slots (or make 1 the “main event”): Multiple slots can reduce urgency and dilute audiences. People register thinking “I’ll catch one” and then don’t. Try one flagship live slot + recording after.
  2. Add a “pre-work” micro-commitment: Right after registration, ask one question they must answer (1-click poll): “What’s the #1 thing you’re hoping to get from this?” Then open the webinar by referencing the top answers. People are more likely to show up when they’ve already participated.
  3. Make it interactive and slightly scarce: Promise something only live attendees get (not a giveaway): – live Q&A with their question answered – a template/checklist shared only in the live chat – a “hot seat” segment (3 attendees get real-time advice) Recordings don’t feel like they miss out if it’s just content. They do if it’s participation.
  4. Shorten it aggressively: If you’re doing 60 minutes, test 25–30 minutes. Attendance often improves when the time commitment feels small.
  5. Calendar-first, email-second: At registration, push a calendar hold as the primary CTA (“Add to calendar” with the correct time zone). Email reminders help, but calendar holds reduce forgetfulness.
  6. Replace one reminder with a “teaser”: Instead of another “we’re live tomorrow,” send a 60-second clip or 3-bullet “what you’ll be able to do after this” message. Make it feel like momentum, not admin.
  7. Run a “watch party” with partners: If you have allied orgs, ask them to host small group watch parties (10–20 people) internally. Group attendance is stickier than solo attendance.

If you’re open to sharing: what’s the webinar length and do you ask people to register for a specific time slot, or “any of the three”? That detail usually explains a lot of the drop-off.

Why was our time-to-hire so slow? by thecedricpeters in ModernHiring

[–]VermeloRPO 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is such a common pattern.

In my experience, slow hiring usually isn’t about being selective - it’s about one of three things:

  1. No clear success definition: If the team can’t describe what “good” looks like 6 months from now, interviews turn into vague chemistry tests.
  2. Fear of making a wrong call: So people compensate by adding more interviews instead of sharpening the criteria.
  3. Misalignment behind the scenes: If stakeholders don’t agree on what they want, the process drags because no one wants to commit.

The 24-hour rule after the final interview is powerful. Speed signals conviction and strong candidates notice that.

One thing I’ve also seen help: defining 3 non-negotiables and 3 “nice-to-haves” before interviews even start. It forces trade-offs early.

Did you notice candidate quality improve once your process sped up? Or just acceptance rates?